Build Threads The place for complete build threads of 1st Gen RX-7s.

4-Rotor FB Build (side ports!!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2012 | 02:41 PM
  #126  
cfamilyfix's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 2
From: Brooklyn NY
^^^^lol.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2012 | 09:29 PM
  #127  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
I'd love to not have to, actually.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2012 | 09:45 PM
  #128  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Setting end play...

Your usual thrust assembly has pices with various thicknesses due to the manufacturing process. It's your job to find the right combo of parts to get .002". However the usual thrust pieces end up making the stack too thick due to a minor machining error on the front slip-on journal. It's only about 1mm too long. No biggie, but when you're talking in the thousandths of an inch, it's too much.

The shaft only has .016" to .017" free end play. It used to be zero until I clearanced the front stat bearing. I can work within this narrow window, I think.

Yes, it's fully seated against the taper. I impacted it on like a 20B. So the journal realy is slightly too long. Right. I've never done this before so I'm discovering it as I go.

I asked Jantore if his 13B based 4 rotor had these problems. Nope. Hmm, gotta be a 12A issue.

A regular small thrust plate is 3.00mm usually. This is the one that rides up next to the shaft. It has a taper on one side to fit the shoulder where it expands at the stat bearing journal. This taper isn't necessary on the 4 rotor as it's a straight 90 degree there.

This means I can simply precision grind down the tapered side and not have to worry about it reducing the taper. About 2.00mm is what I'm looking for in the end.

I tested this theory with a slightly worn one. I rough ground it down to 2.04 to 1.98mm. A little too short but a step in the right direction.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 02:34 AM
  #129  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
It's sitting at .003"! Pretty good, but I could go for .002". Then again, this is a chromoly shaft and will probably act differently than a stock one as it expands while warming up. I don't want to run out of clearance at the rear stat gear if it grows quicker than the engine.

From earlier when I determined I had .016" to .017" of end play to work with, I set out to get my .002" right in the middle for safety purposes. Well, after fiddling with it for more hours than I'd like to count, I ended up at almost exactly the half way point.

At first it was pulling the shaft too far forward and butting up against the stat bearing again, so I swapped in something with much less clearance and over-tighened the front stack so I could crank the engine and "machine" the softer stat gear and bearing material using the much harder shaft like a lathe.

It worked! After I got done and swapped the regular thrust stuff back in, I was able to measure .008" between the big thrust plate and the flat area of the stat gear where the thrust plate bolts to. I didn't have this kind of clearance before.

I popped the stat gear out and looked at it. Sure enough, the harder shaft had smoothed down any high spots in the stat gear bevel, leaving some metal bits behind. The shaft had a little clean spot in the oil where it had rubbed hard against the stat gear, but no other markings of any kind. Interesting (to me at least).

So I went ahead and put the whole thrust assembly back together and checked end play. It didn't seem to have any anymore so I swapped in a slightly thinner small thrust washer (the one that rides against the front counterweight). That gave me the .003" I mentioned earlier. Good enough for tonight.

I'd like some opinions on what end play to use on a 4 rotor. Thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 12:47 PM
  #130  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
My first instinct would be to use double the stock clearance, assuming that twice the rotating length would result in twice the thermal expansion... but I don't know the difference in thermal coefficients involved.

Slightly too much would probably be better than slightly too little. The only build error I've ever made was cutting end play too fine; engine died of overheat in less than 10k miles
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 12:52 PM
  #131  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by DivinDriver
My first instinct would be to use double the stock clearance, assuming that twice the rotating length would result in twice the thermal expansion... but I don't know the difference in thermal coefficients involved.

Slightly too much would probably be better than slightly too little. The only build error I've ever made was cutting end play too fine; engine died of overheat in less than 10k miles
i agree, i'd rather be on the big side of the clearance...
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 03:05 PM
  #132  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Awesome, then .003" it is!
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 03:08 PM
  #133  
bikeboy23332's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: kentucky
i love this build, mainly because it looks like a normal person could piece this thing together after buying a kit. it would be so awesome seeing a old school fb on some nice old equips with that engine under the hood ! color scheme is awesome btw digging it.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 07:49 PM
  #134  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
I'm waiting to see how Jeff shoehorns this sucker into an FB frame... split & angled front radiators & a dry sump oil system, maybe?
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2012 | 09:51 PM
  #135  
ArmyOfOne's Avatar
Bridge Port Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 3
From: Alzey, Germany
Jeff! Awesome work man. Can't wait to get back to see this in person.

I think the mounting thing would be the easiest part. If you cut the crossmember and add bent mild steel bars going from side to side it will be perfect. Thats how vanishing point racecars does it. They still say the setups are street legal too.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 09:01 PM
  #136  
zaridar's Avatar
35r 13b first gen
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Richland Center WI
when you thinking this thing will be running? im excited to see it!! thats an understatement!
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 12:57 AM
  #137  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
I have to take a break from the 4 rotor to "pay the bills" but now I can get a hardened oil pump. I also found a really nice front cover in the pile today. It has an older OMP with the adjustable stop. This is perfect for getting some pre-load on the OMP output; to "jack it open" so to speak. This lets me use a stock rod.

I'm thinking about clocking the OMP lever a little further open as another option. Or shorten the lever so it opens more per throttle open angle than stock.

Thoughts?

Remember it has to feed two engines worth of apex seals now. Premix will probably always be necesseary, but on those occasions when the mixture isn't quite right, the OMP has to take up the slack.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 01:02 AM
  #138  
cfamilyfix's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 2
From: Brooklyn NY
That makes sense Jeff...premix + OMP all the way. Why take the chance? People will be so enchanted by the sound of the engine, they will never notice the plumes of smoke out back...lol
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 09:53 AM
  #139  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
Originally Posted by Jeff20B
Remember it has to feed two engines worth of apex seals now. Premix will probably always be necesseary, but on those occasions when the mixture isn't quite right, the OMP has to take up the slack.
Yeah, an easy mistake is to think that since the OMP feeds into the carb, it's doing volumetric mixing of oil with fuel - - but it's not. The OMP's output is driven by an RPM signal, not by total fuel volume.

At a given RPM with double the number of firing chambers, fuel consumption of your beast will be roughly double what the OMP was calibrated for by the factory.

Premix, being volumetric based on ratio of oil to fuel, is the safe solution.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 09:10 PM
  #140  
zaridar's Avatar
35r 13b first gen
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Richland Center WI
wire it all the way open haha i did this on my 12a streetport sidedraft... it smoked so badly... i think i had to fill up the oil everytime i got gas... never had to change it though... just the filter... everyone thought my car was about to blow up... worked great.... i know you probably want something more precise that this though...
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2012 | 12:55 PM
  #141  
ArmyOfOne's Avatar
Bridge Port Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 3
From: Alzey, Germany
I have mine pegged open on the semi p-port. No issues. I would use the second gen N/A OMP. That way you have 4 outlets that you could plumb straight to the intake manifold. right before the pump.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 12:07 AM
  #142  
zaridar's Avatar
35r 13b first gen
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Richland Center WI
Originally Posted by ArmyOfOne
I have mine pegged open on the semi p-port. No issues. I would use the second gen N/A OMP. That way you have 4 outlets that you could plumb straight to the intake manifold. right before the pump.
Do you have the same rage on oil as gas like i did too?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 10:11 PM
  #143  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Bit of an update...

Starting to look into exhaust systems. So far I've narrowed it to two choices.

Choice 1:
something resembling the RB "streetport" exhaust where each 180 degree rotor pair is collected into a 2.5" secondary pipe, for two running side by side under the chassis as a "long secondary system"; each with its own presilencer acting like two short primary systems side by side. Then collect up over the rearend and into one big muffler in the stock rear location. I was going to test this type of setup on a regular RB streetport center section and powerpulse muffler for sound quality and noise control. If decent, it'll come out and get replaced with 2.5" components and a 2.5" or 3" main muffler.*

*main muffler size would depend on flow calculations and sound/noise considerations.

Choice 2:
collect both 180 degree rotor pairs early into dual 2.5", then travel for 6", then collect both into a single 3" as a "short primary/short secondary system" and pack the center section with mufflers. This option is lighter and may flow better because the theory is once the primaries collect into secondaries, there is nothing else to be gained flow-wise -- only losses can occour. A bit of a trade off weight-wise and flow-wise compared with the short primary/long secondary above, as I'm sure rotarygod would agree. But which is best? Perhaps the one the exhaust fabricator (myself) prefers?

Better include option 3:
long primary system with four 2" thickwall pipes, four presilencers, collect 80 to 100 inches from the engine into two sets of 2.5" collectors. Then exit through dual 2.5" mufflers. Or collect into 2.75" or 3" and then into a single 3" or 2.5" muffler, depending on noise and flow (and because 2.75" mufflers aren't common). But of course there isn't enough room for four presilencers under a 1st gen.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 12:26 AM
  #144  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
Option 4: Four 6-inch-long, 90-degree elbows pointed straight down.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2012 | 12:35 AM
  #145  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Thinking about exhaust options a bit more. I'm starting to think the long secondary system described above (choice 1) with its 2.5" presilencers is a bad idea. Why? Because once you collect the primaries, the important exhaust tuning is done. So while it can work because it's based on two regular collected headers, it just adds unnecessary weight, complexity and cost (two 2.5" presilencers aren't cheap) and adds no power advantages. So scrap option one. I'd only try it if I had an RB "streetport" center section available and wasn't gonna keep the 4 rotor in the car for very long, as the powerpulse muffler was designed for dual primaries which are loud, not dual secondaries which are quiet(er). I wanna hear the 4 rotor. Plus it's kinda restrictive.

So it looks like option 2 is the one I'll do.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2012 | 01:16 AM
  #146  
turbo_dave's Avatar
#turbodavebuilt
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 7
From: EL SERENO
Up Up, Down Down, Left Right Left Right, B A, Select Start.


Reminds me of CONTRA lol.great build by the way,I cant believe i barely found this thread.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2012 | 02:13 AM
  #147  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Ah, you got the Contra reference! I still recall reading that in Nintendo Power magazine one Sunday morning back then. I committed it to memory as I'm sure thousands of kids did.

I just think it's cool how the shaft has the same configuration.

I have a small update on the exhaust situation. Turns out the RB streetport is available so that's what I'll use.

There's something anticlimactic about this so it must be the right choice. Actually it's because the 4 rotor won't stay in the car for very long. Just long enough to test and make sure it will run. Then a 13B will go in so someone can drive it.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2012 | 11:50 PM
  #148  
zaridar's Avatar
35r 13b first gen
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Richland Center WI
Talking

Originally Posted by DivinDriver
Option 4: Four 6-inch-long, 90-degree elbows pointed straight down.
does this option include the earmuffs?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 03:00 PM
  #149  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Tiny update:
The stat gears in the end plates need to be shortened a little. This will give back the end play I'm lacking right now. Seems Jeff Bruce may have made the slip-on journals about 1mm too long, so I'll shorten the stat gears by that much. It'll gain me about 2mm of end play while not weakening the stat gears.

No telling when I'll do this, but figured I'd spread the word. I know you guys like updates in any form.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 03:06 PM
  #150  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
Originally Posted by zaridar
does this option include the earmuffs?
& it also does a great job of blowing all the leaves out of the gutters.

After setting them on fire.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM.