Progressive controllers/pulse pump dynamics
#29
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
that's another really great thing about AI.... i am obviously out of injectors without it running my turbos. w AI i don't have to go thru all the XXXX about adding more injectors. they run in a nice range now.
part of the new paradigm of AI.
hc
part of the new paradigm of AI.
hc
#30
fart on a friends head!!!
Originally Posted by howard coleman
that's another really great thing about AI.... i am obviously out of injectors without it running my turbos. w AI i don't have to go thru all the XXXX about adding more injectors. they run in a nice range now.
part of the new paradigm of AI.
hc
part of the new paradigm of AI.
hc
Last edited by rotorbrain; 02-09-07 at 09:28 AM.
#31
Cant be bothered anymore
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Norwich UK
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was gonna sit here and make a rough estimation of the amount of meth you are seeing as aposed do what the nozzel rating is but...... It will take to damn long and there are far to many factors in it for my brain to deal with atm....
I will have a look to see if i can find the shurflo flo chart for the pump you have and work out how much flow vs pressure you have. Becasue i bet the amount is far lower than you think. I'm not arguing the fact its bad..more out of interest
Scott
I will have a look to see if i can find the shurflo flo chart for the pump you have and work out how much flow vs pressure you have. Becasue i bet the amount is far lower than you think. I'm not arguing the fact its bad..more out of interest
Scott
#34
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Smoking a fat one
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Howard said in the "other thread" that he was loging flow on his AI system. The whole "DUH" coment. When we were debating lag issues.
Last edited by PimpyHand; 02-09-07 at 10:27 AM.
#36
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
rotorbrain re idc's..
i don't know as to whether there is a sweet spot/efficiency area. i do know that most people that are running 55 pound per minute turbos and have 850/1600 injectors are close to running static (wide open). that's not a good situation.
w the addition of AI you can probably knock 20% off the IDC and i know that's a good thing. beyond that i confess i don't care.
hc
i don't know as to whether there is a sweet spot/efficiency area. i do know that most people that are running 55 pound per minute turbos and have 850/1600 injectors are close to running static (wide open). that's not a good situation.
w the addition of AI you can probably knock 20% off the IDC and i know that's a good thing. beyond that i confess i don't care.
hc
#37
BDC Motorsports
Originally Posted by howard coleman
rotorbrain re idc's..
i don't know as to whether there is a sweet spot/efficiency area. i do know that most people that are running 55 pound per minute turbos and have 850/1600 injectors are close to running static (wide open). that's not a good situation.
w the addition of AI you can probably knock 20% off the IDC and i know that's a good thing. beyond that i confess i don't care.
hc
i don't know as to whether there is a sweet spot/efficiency area. i do know that most people that are running 55 pound per minute turbos and have 850/1600 injectors are close to running static (wide open). that's not a good situation.
w the addition of AI you can probably knock 20% off the IDC and i know that's a good thing. beyond that i confess i don't care.
hc
B
#38
Good videos to show the pump response to on/off pulses - led and high speed valve was used as datum.
Click here to watch fastswtiching
Click here to watch pumpjump
Click here to watch lag-20-33
Click here to watch spraypulses
Be patient - take some time to download
Click here to watch fastswtiching
Click here to watch pumpjump
Click here to watch lag-20-33
Click here to watch spraypulses
Be patient - take some time to download
#42
mmm reading this got me thinking. so i made a test rig and started flow testing my progressive controller 'from a ''leading'' brand'.
30 lbs of boost. 50ml/min
20 lbs of boost. 50ml/min
10 lbs of boost. 50ml/min
the 'CONTROLLER' if it can be called that was set at 30psi max boost with a turn on of 1psi.
pumping water. through an 'M1' jet. the pulsation and vibration was increadable. and the run on seen in richard's video was present with or without the checkvalve before the jet.
the tests were repeated three times and the results were conclusive.
NOT impressed.
so Scott's was not a one off...
Ollie.
30 lbs of boost. 50ml/min
20 lbs of boost. 50ml/min
10 lbs of boost. 50ml/min
the 'CONTROLLER' if it can be called that was set at 30psi max boost with a turn on of 1psi.
pumping water. through an 'M1' jet. the pulsation and vibration was increadable. and the run on seen in richard's video was present with or without the checkvalve before the jet.
the tests were repeated three times and the results were conclusive.
NOT impressed.
so Scott's was not a one off...
Ollie.
#45
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
the fact that this is, as scott represents, is a "full" kit makes this test IMO a reasonable test to consider.
obviously there are assumptions as settings & setup etc but it is worth analysis.
i do have one question. you are using an M1 jet? an M1 jet as i understand flows 63 cc/minute. that's almost like no jet. i run two M10s. most people run at least one M5 or 6 or 7.... Ollie please do put a jet on your test setup that flows 300 to 500 ccs and let us know what you find.
i have absolutely no problem w this process and perhaps we will learn something additional of value here.
howard coleman
obviously there are assumptions as settings & setup etc but it is worth analysis.
i do have one question. you are using an M1 jet? an M1 jet as i understand flows 63 cc/minute. that's almost like no jet. i run two M10s. most people run at least one M5 or 6 or 7.... Ollie please do put a jet on your test setup that flows 300 to 500 ccs and let us know what you find.
i have absolutely no problem w this process and perhaps we will learn something additional of value here.
howard coleman
#47
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Smoking a fat one
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by borgue
still have the test rig attached. so if anyone has anything they want me to try let me know.
will try some more jets on monday.
Ollie
will try some more jets on monday.
Ollie
First let me say thank you for your effort.
Could I ask you to move the spray nozzles a little further apart. The reason I ask this is the spray paterns are intertangled. As a result its not easy to tell the spray paterns apart. I think moving the nozzles 12in ( or so ) away from each other will add alot of definition to the spray paterns, and really show the diffrence.
#50
Cant be bothered anymore
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Norwich UK
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand why you want ollie to try differant jets BUT. The kit is suposed to flow any jet and clearly from the evedence we have seen this is not the case.
I would like to draw the attention to this thread. David clearly says the controller has the ability to trim the flow.
https://www.rx7club.com/auxiliary-injection-173/hondahaters-ai-questions-never-get-answered-591272/
This post has bought my data back into the public domain as 100 % relevant ?
Scott
I would like to draw the attention to this thread. David clearly says the controller has the ability to trim the flow.
https://www.rx7club.com/auxiliary-injection-173/hondahaters-ai-questions-never-get-answered-591272/
This post has bought my data back into the public domain as 100 % relevant ?
Scott