Alternative Fuels Discussion and Tech on using alternatives such as E85 or Hydrogen or other fuels and/or supplements to Gasoline in Rotary Engines

471rwhp/300rwtq at 13psi on E85!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 06:57 PM
  #1  
crispeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
471rwhp/300rwtq at 13psi on E85!!!!!!

Made two quick runs on the dyno today to see where I was with the E-85 tune. The AFR's were all over the place.
Going to finish with the tune up in the coming week.

Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:08 PM
  #2  
rotaryengineering's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Talking Nice numbers and they say E85 does not work

Crispeed,

How do you like tuning with E85 compared to Race Gas?
Most of the local guys I spoke to about this say E85 does not work. I really don't understand why it would not. So the "Corn Juice" does work well with Rotaries.

How about the cooling properties of E85 compared to Methanol?

Keep updating this thread I am interested in seeing how much power you can make with this stuff that is not suppose to work.

Thanks
Albert
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:11 PM
  #3  
rotary8's Avatar
eccentric shafter
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 143
Likes: 1
From: EARTH
471rwhp/300rwtq at 13psi on E85!!!!!!

crispeed which car is this that you are working on.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:13 PM
  #4  
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
Learned alot | Alot to go
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
From: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
What did you do fuel system wise? Did you have to go to all 1680's or something similar?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:16 PM
  #5  
crispeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by rotary8
crispeed which car is this that you are working on.
V8Killa!
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:17 PM
  #6  
crispeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by CrackHeadMel
What did you do fuel system wise? Did you have to go to all 1680's or something similar?
Everything is the same just added two more 1600cc injectors for a total of six now.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:25 PM
  #7  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
why is the tq so low?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:28 PM
  #8  
crispeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
why is the tq so low?
Low boost. High rpm torque peak. Tune is way off still. Who knows!
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #9  
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
Learned alot | Alot to go
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
From: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
rpm?

edit: damn i was beaten

how much advance?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:31 PM
  #10  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
interesting..

i've been interested in this E85 stuff lately, but in kentucky we have like 3 E85 pumps in the whole state and they are nowhere near where i live.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:37 PM
  #11  
rotary8's Avatar
eccentric shafter
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 143
Likes: 1
From: EARTH
471rwhp/300rwtq at 13psi on E85!!!!!!

crispeed are you running the same turbo as before or is it a different one.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #12  
crispeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by rotary8
crispeed are you running the same turbo as before or is it a different one.
Same turbo. Precision PT76 GTS.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 09:09 PM
  #13  
crispeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
why is the tq so low?
Just to add the runs were done in 3rd gear so both power and torque is going to be lower more so with a 4.30 final drive..
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #14  
btleier's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: Minot, ND
6 1680s? so you must be super low on duty cycle? I did mine with only 2) 850s and 2) 1680s. when I dynoed mine on the e85.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 09:44 PM
  #15  
crispeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by btleier
6 1680s? so you must be super low on duty cycle? I did mine with only 2) 850s and 2) 1680s. when I dynoed mine on the e85.
Well seeing that it maxed 4X1600cc originally I just added two more.
I had to lower the activation point of the staged injectors so as not to lean out on the primaries so it's taking about 30% more fuel presently.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:01 PM
  #16  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
why is the tq so low?
300 rwtq @ 13psi is low??? Last time I checked, I havent seen many pull that torque with that boost. If any at all. This engine is pulling out to 9.5k rpms, so obviously the horsepower should be much higher than the torque, unless the setup was built improperly. Which this was very well done.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #17  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
Originally Posted by crispeed
Just to add the runs were done in 3rd gear so both power and torque is going to be lower more so with a 4.30 final drive..
You dont have to say anything about the torque figures, they are MORE than good at such a psi.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #18  
Jason's Avatar
The one
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 5
From: Fort Worth, TX
I think he is questioning the torque numbers because they are low for a car making 470 RWHP.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:18 PM
  #19  
13B-RX3's Avatar
7s before paint!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
From: Philly/Texas
Congrats Chris!!! Great numbers so far!!!
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #20  
crispeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by Jason
I think he is questioning the torque numbers because they are low for a car making 470 RWHP.
Well you know how it goes.
You can basically tell the PSI by the torque made give or take depending on the rpm also.

RPM BOOST
4k 2.6psi
4.5k 5.5psi
5k 10.5psi
5.5k 12.5psi
6k 12.7psi
6.5k 13.0psi
7k 13.1psi
7.5k 13.2psi
8k 13.1psi
8.5k 13.2psi
9k 13.2psi
9.5k 13.3psi

Last edited by crispeed; Dec 20, 2007 at 11:23 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #21  
crispeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by GtoRx7
You dont have to say anything about the torque figures, they are MORE than good at such a psi.
I can only try!
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:57 PM
  #22  
crispeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by 13B-RX3
Congrats Chris!!! Great numbers so far!!!
Thanks Allen.
I'm still waiting to play 1000 questions!
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 11:14 PM
  #23  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
Originally Posted by Jason
I think he is questioning the torque numbers because they are low for a car making 470 RWHP.
Maybe low compared to a average car making 470rwhp @ 17-18psi. As most Rx-7s on this forum make peak power in the 7-7.5k range. A engine reving to over 9k, and having the breathing abilities to support such rpms, SHOULD have much higher hp than torque. Its a simple mathematical formula.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #24  
btleier's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: Minot, ND
Originally Posted by crispeed
Well seeing that it maxed 4X1600cc originally I just added two more.
I had to lower the activation point of the staged injectors so as not to lean out on the primaries so it's taking about 30% more fuel presently.
I find this interesting.... cause I did 424whp @ 18psi on e85, stock motor at a t67. and I wasn't faxed out on 2 850s and 2 1600s. what is the rest of the fuel system look like on the car?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 11:34 PM
  #25  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
If I remember correctly, He maxed out the 4 x 1600's when running over 30 PSI on C16. The car did 685rwhp at the time, and later ran with even more boost, but was not re-dynoed. Although it was muuuch faster than before.

Now the setup has added 2 additional injectors to support more fuel, using e85. This new power was only off a wastegate spring, with the boost controller off. It was a shakedown pass to see what its like on e85. So far, it looks very promising.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.