3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Y pipe with spitter mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 09:13 AM
  #1  
silverflash2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: FL
Question Y pipe with spitter mod

I'm looking into buying a y pipe and jt imports said that there's a spitter mod. Anybody suggest this!

Here's the email:

The splitter mod is a medal divider between the Y-pip to prevent air from
one turbo to be forced into
the other while boosting, to provide power and longer lasting turbos..

They run about $200 and they are all pretty much USED. New I would have to
talk to a shop and
see..

Sincerly,
Jason
JT-Imports
Yokohama, Japan
www.jt-imports.com
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 09:14 AM
  #2  
silverflash2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: FL
this is a 99 and up efini y pipe also
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 10:11 AM
  #3  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,281
Likes: 703
From: Arlington, VA
Same theory as a divided single turbo manifold.... hmmm

Only down side i could see is that each turbo would effectively have to flow through a portion of the y-pipe thats half the size of the rest of the piping... a likely bottleneck, and as i understand it (questionable indeed), airflow is much like a chain: only as good as the weakest link.

i'd be interested to see data on the mod tho....
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #4  
r0t0r-rooter's Avatar
call me Smokie Smokerson
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Here's the previous thread regarding this:
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...ighlight=ypipe

It was pretty informative until it got off-topic
I don't believe anyone posted any definitive results, though.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 02:33 PM
  #5  
laujesse's Avatar
Thrashing your Roy score!
Veteran: Air Force
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 73
From: Japan
Good stuff. Small gain but a gain none the less.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 02:40 PM
  #6  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by ptrhahn
Only down side i could see is that each turbo would effectively have to flow through a portion of the y-pipe thats half the size of the rest of the piping... a likely bottleneck.
Doesn't matter here. It's the stock y-pipe so both turbos have the same volume of pipe to blow through whether the splitter is there or not. The splitter should work exactly as claimed, how that translates to horsepower I dunno. I don't see how it could possibly hurt.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 03:35 PM
  #7  
billyrohm's Avatar
Man who sold his 7
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicville, NY
Either way the air coming from each turbo has to enter the motor at the same spot so why split them just to rejoin them?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 05:48 PM
  #8  
911GT2's Avatar
The Power of 1.3
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Shrewsbury, Massachusetts
You'd split it because pressurized air coming from the first turbo might get into the wrong side second turbo while it's try to spool up, effectively slowing it down. I don't know if this actually happens, but it's a decent theory.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 05:57 PM
  #9  
r0t0r-rooter's Avatar
call me Smokie Smokerson
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Originally posted by 911GT2
You'd split it because pressurized air coming from the first turbo might get into the wrong side second turbo while it's try to spool up, effectively slowing it down. I don't know if this actually happens, but it's a decent theory.
I thought it was to reduce turbulence when both turbos are pumping out boost.... sorta like the "tornado". The control actuator prevents air from going into 2nd turbo, I think
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 11:40 PM
  #10  
SpiritR's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: out there
IMHO is doesnt seem to restrict anything, it actually seems to increase turbulance, reduce/prevent the air from turbo one pushing into turbo two on lower boosting levels. I mean stock turbos arent T-51Rs here, they dont put out much, so it seem legite to me.

I would be interested in seeing the results though, maybe the guys in Japan (Jason or Jesse) can ask one of the shops for a dyno or some hard info.

Last edited by SpiritR; Jul 18, 2003 at 11:43 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 12:38 AM
  #11  
laujesse's Avatar
Thrashing your Roy score!
Veteran: Air Force
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 73
From: Japan
I saw it in RX-7 magazine. It helps in transition more than anything. The hp gain is small but it comes at the right time... There is no negative to doing this.

It also puts less back pressure on the turbines.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #12  
Cihuuy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Myanmar
who has actually done this? any difference in Hp? did it reduces lag (seq)?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM
yetter227
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
20
Sep 5, 2015 11:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.