3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

windtunnel

Old Sep 15, 2004 | 11:09 AM
  #1  
tedsmith26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: houston
windtunnel

does any one have and pics or videos of a stock fd3s in a windtunnal or does any one know where to find them? i have tried searching for them a few time but i have not had any luck. and i was wondering what kind mods for the body would help beside just a front lip
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 11:16 AM
  #2  
fastcarfreak's Avatar
3rd motors a charm I hope
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Central New York
sorry cant help you with wind tunnel videos, but i can tell you that the Coefficient of drag on a bone stock 3rd gen is .29
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 11:44 AM
  #3  
tedsmith26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: houston
i am looking at making my rx7 as a autocross or a highway race car and i want it to be stable at high speeds but still look stock. if any one has any ideas on how to do that it would help.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 11:47 AM
  #4  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by tedsmith26
i am looking at making my rx7 as a autocross or a highway race car and i want it to be stable at high speeds but still look stock. if any one has any ideas on how to do that it would help.
The car is actually pretty stable at high speeds in stock form (minus wind and bad roads).

The '99 Spec Rear Wing is very popular with the road racers as it's adjustable and adds downforce for high speed handling.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 12:54 PM
  #5  
macdaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Autocross (at least SCCA Solo I and similar varieties) is run "at or below highway speeds," so aerodynamics are not typically much of an issue. If you want to add enough aerodynamic elements to actually be effective at those speeds, you would be moving into the modified classes - take a look at the size of the wings on the A-Mod cars to see what I mean.

Some forum participants did provide me some aero data recently that you might want to review:
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/aero-data-fd-311143/
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 12:54 PM
  #6  
macdaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
oops - make that Solo II, not I
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 01:42 PM
  #7  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 334
From: Bend, OR
First off: adding downforce is good, but removing lift is just as good, and can usually be accomplished without adding drag.

For starters, the suspension: you should be able to adjust that already if you race competitively. Put the car as low as you can without rubbing, scraping, hitting the bumpstops or wreaking havoc on suspension geometry / alignment. The less air under the car, the better. Also, add some rake: put the front slightly lower than the rear, this will help make the car more stable at high speeds. This will affect your corner weights, so be aware of that. At all but the highest cornering speeds, your cornerweights will usually be more important; it's difficult to drive a car that has two different personalities depending on whether there's downforce or not. If you don't already know what cornerweights are, go learn about suspension, alignment and chassis setup before you do any more research into aerodynamics.

Do the sealed undertray thing, that will help reduce drag & lift from the underside of the car, which is really not too bad to start with, the underside of these cars are pretty smooth from the factory. If you're planning on moving the fuel tank, that will allow you room to make some underbody channels, which will decrease lift.

Front lip, sideskirts and a vented hood will help, again less air flowing under the car. Don't go overboard with the size of the hood vents, you don't want your hood creating tons of turbulence. For instance, I would probably not recommend the Scoot hood, those vents are a bit too extreme in size and angle of attack. Don't add any lips or skirts to the rear bumper, it will add drag: imagine a teardrop shape, or a droplet of rain. This is the ideal shape you're shooting for: the rear should not be disrupting airflow at all.

If very high speeds are your goal (120+mph), get rid of your side-view mirrors while you're at it, remove them completely and add mirrors inside the car.

As mentioned above, if you're doing this for SCCA Solo II / Autocross competition, you're wasting your time. What you need is a lightweight car with wide sticky tires, good suspension, and plenty of low and mid-range power. Autocross events rarely get you into third gear, aerodynamics are not an issue and even if they were you're doing too much turning for most aero aids to make a significant difference.

-s-
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 09:33 PM
  #8  
tedsmith26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: houston
has any one made something to cover the driveshaft channel to make it smooth under the car to help air movement and if u have has it help ?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Landon303
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
155
Jan 11, 2012 05:44 PM
FDNewbie
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
46
Dec 12, 2005 11:43 AM
eViLRotor
Canadian Forum
50
Jul 28, 2005 11:15 AM
veo614
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
27
Jul 18, 2003 02:02 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.