vmount intercooler...(pics )
#51
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ohio
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Thanks for doing that. I was afraid of that, it's quite a bit smaller than my M2 large.
reg v mount core: 15x10.5x3=472.5 cubic inches
M2 large: 17x12.55x3.5=746.7 cubic inches.
damn, that is a substantial difference
reg v mount core: 15x10.5x3=472.5 cubic inches
M2 large: 17x12.55x3.5=746.7 cubic inches.
damn, that is a substantial difference
pretty sure reg v mount is 900-920
i think its a pwr core ...can't remember now, i can look tomorrow
(think i saw a sticker left on it)
http://www.pwr-performance.com/intercooler.htm
#52
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For a comparison, the numbers I have on the Knightsport V-mount core is 15.75" X 10.25" X 2.75" or 444 cubic inches. Of coarse, the air flow might be higher than a S-mount.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fd, fd3s, ic, installation, intercooler, is300, mount, panel, piping, proper, rx7, undertray, v, vmount, youngstown