3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Ultimate Weight Saving Link

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-02, 09:18 PM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
Brentis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arrow Ultimate Weight Saving Link

This link is crazy. I rather figure out how to make more HP than figure out that the front engine eye hook w/ both bolts weighs 0.73lbs.

Nonetheless these people thought it was worthwhile to find out and much more.

http://www.purplemantis.com/Mantissa..._reduction.htm
Old 11-04-02, 09:57 PM
  #2  
1993 RX7 R1

 
Mr. Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is Gene Felber's site.
I have posted that link here on the forum whenever someone asks about stripping weight off the FD3S.
Check the current thread Dropping some weight in an RX7

BTW, there are two ways to make your car go faster
1)Make more horsepower
2)get rid of unnecessary weight

Which way do you think is better?

If you said 1)Make more HP, you are wrong.
It's always better to shed weight. Now, guess why.
Old 11-04-02, 10:20 PM
  #3  
Will u do me a kindness?

iTrader: (2)
 
the_glass_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Parlor City, NY
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Just because these cars don't way much to start, does not mean you shouldn't look for ways to shed a few pounds.
Reducing weight aids acceleration, braking, cornering, gas consumption.
The less weight the better if you ask me.
Thats why I don't have PS, A/C, etc...
Old 11-04-02, 10:24 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
Brentis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well both approaches reach their limits - it is just which one hits it first.

I also subscribe to the thought of not thinking of ways to save $$$ but ways to make more $$$

And finally I think that HP is like watts, bandwidth, real estate, $$$, and women.
Old 11-04-02, 10:27 PM
  #5  
Money Pit

iTrader: (1)
 
Flyrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wa. state
Posts: 1,129
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
[QUOTEIt's always better to shed weight. Now, guess why. [/B][/QUOTE]

Ooh, could it be because it's cheaper?
Here I go, but it seems to me I "read" somewhere that for every hundred pounds you drop you gain 1/10th in the quarter. One of the reason why the "commitee's" made Mazda add balast to make them more inline with the other cars in their class (eventually making Mazda unable to compete in their class, whole other story, but I digress). Actually, if you read Yamaguchi's book, they were on a "gram" shaving quest just to get the 3rd gen into the HP to weight ratio that was their target goal from the beginning. A little here, a little there can add up.

Regards,
Frank
Old 11-04-02, 10:34 PM
  #6  
1993 RX7 R1

 
Mr. Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too many damn 1/4 milers here.
This is the RX7FORUM, isn't it? Where are all the road racers?
Sigh...
Old 11-04-02, 10:41 PM
  #7  
Money Pit

iTrader: (1)
 
Flyrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wa. state
Posts: 1,129
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Originally posted by Mr. Stock
Too many damn 1/4 milers here.
This is the RX7FORUM, isn't it? Where are all the road racers?
Sigh...
Not sure if this reply is directed at my post, but what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
I use the quarter mile analogy that my autoshop teacher taught us to make a point, his context, not mine. I'm sure that if you shave weight and it makes you faster in the quarter it will make you faster on the track, auto-x, slalom, parking lot, driveway, whatever
The point I was trying to make is even Oprah could run a 5 second 40 if she shed like 60 pounds..... (or a 5 minute mile for you track guys

Frank
Old 11-04-02, 10:42 PM
  #8  
1993 RX7 R1

 
Mr. Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Flyrx7
Actually, if you read Yamaguchi's book, they were on a "gram" shaving quest just to get the 3rd gen into the HP to weight ratio that was their target goal from the beginning. A little here, a little there can add up.
Operation Zero.

Last edited by Mr. Stock; 11-04-02 at 10:45 PM.
Old 11-04-02, 10:48 PM
  #9  
1993 RX7 R1

 
Mr. Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Flyrx7

Not sure if this reply is directed at my post, but what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
It was directed at the goose.

Less weight=better handling. Of course, better acceleration is a given.
Old 11-05-02, 02:58 AM
  #10  
WWFSMD

 
maxcooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Reducing weight increases performance in every way (not ride, but I mean the fun kind of performance). The RX-7 would be much less interesting if it weighed 3200-3800 lbs like the other cars in its class. I like HP, too, but light weight is a very key element of the RX-7 design and making it even lighter generally makes it even better.

Reducing unsprung weight (wheels, tires, suspension) makes the suspension work better (more grip). Reducing rotating weight (wheels, tires, flywheel, driveshaft) increases dynamic drive power (RWHP on a DynoJet), especially in low gears. It also improves throttle response and makes downshifting a lot easier. Reducing the polar moment (by reducing weight or just moving it in toward the center from the ends of the car) makes the car easier to turn for faster lap times. Weight removed from anywhere improves acceleration, braking, and handling.

The Mosler MT900 has a Z-06 drivetrain but only weighs 2200 lbs. It goes 0-60 in 3.5 seconds and can get 28 MPG with the air conditioning on.

I realize this is all a bit obsessive, but reducing weight really pays off.

-Max
Old 11-05-02, 03:43 AM
  #11  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
i guess in operation zero they didnt care for doors that closed nicely
Old 11-05-02, 02:31 PM
  #12  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
So, if you really want your car to accelerate faster and handle better, get your body fat down to 8%. No sense dropping 50 lbs of car weight if you are super-sizing at Burger King.
Old 12-13-03, 10:34 AM
  #13  
Full Member

 
tubbinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Where are the road racers?" you say? I'm here :-)

I just saw the thread about the LS1 engine in the FD and was equally offended because I'm a rotor-head, but hey, to each his own :-) Besides, I pull my FD to the races with a 350-powered Suburban. Looking for a diesel-powered dually though :-) At least that way my pull vehicle will have a turbo LOL
Old 12-13-03, 12:11 PM
  #14  
Rebreaking things

 
CCarlisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Mr. Stock
Too many damn 1/4 milers here.
This is the RX7FORUM, isn't it? Where are all the road racers?
Sigh...
Here here. (or is it hear hear?.....har har :-p)

For anybody that doesn't see the benefit of weight reduction take a look at the performance numbers a Lotus Elise produces with a NA rover 4 banger.
Old 12-13-03, 01:11 PM
  #15  
Super Snuggles

 
jimlab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 10,091
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
If there are parts you can do without, why not take them off the car to improve performance? As stated previously, it's "free", assuming you're willing to live without them. It's only when you start replacing all your fasteners with Titanium that it becomes an obsessive/compulsive disorder...

I've been weighing almost everything lately. That's why I know I saved 5.6 lbs. by going with an aluminum '03 Cobra 8.8" differential, despite every internal part (differential assembly, ring and pinion, caps, bolts, inner axle stubs) being bigger, heavier, and stronger. That was a fringe benefit, however. The original goal was to gain a wide range of gear ratios at a reasonable cost while improving strength.

You don't have to be obsessive about it, but it never hurts to be aware of what you could save by dropping your A/C or P/S, for example. Gene has just compiled a list of what other people (for the most part) have observed. Some through curiosity, some through an overpowering psychosis to shave every last ounce that isn't absolutely necessary. I wouldn't know anything about that...




Last edited by jimlab; 12-13-03 at 01:13 PM.
Old 12-14-03, 03:47 PM
  #16  
Import Connoisseur

 
tt2323's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: All over the place
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
why can't i open that link?
Old 12-14-03, 03:53 PM
  #17  
Super Snuggles

 
jimlab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 10,091
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally posted by tt2323
why can't i open that link?
Try this one...
http://www.mantissaracing.com/Mantis...eight_data.htm
Old 12-15-03, 03:55 AM
  #18  
Import Connoisseur

 
tt2323's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: All over the place
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
that'll do it. thank you!
Old 12-15-03, 11:13 AM
  #19  
FD title holder since 94

iTrader: (1)
 
Tim Benton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cedartown, Ga
Posts: 4,170
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
Gene's site is down. I can't even get the one Jim posted to load either.

Tim
Old 12-15-03, 11:26 AM
  #20  
Senior Member

 
gfelber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Note- Gene's site has moved...

Originally posted by Tim Benton
Gene's site is down. I can't even get the one Jim posted to load either.

Tim
Guys,

I switched ISPs and domains for more space and better service. I've been uploading some new stuff, so the site may have been down for a bit.

Here ya go:
http://www.mantissaracing.com/Mantis.../RX-7/RX-7.htm


The link for weights is: http://www.mantissaracing.com/Mantis.../RX-7/RX-7.htm

Regards,

Gene
Old 12-15-03, 05:14 PM
  #21  
boxed in and drawn out

 
APEXL8T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bayouself
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by adam c
So, if you really want your car to accelerate faster and handle better, get your body fat down to 8%. No sense dropping 50 lbs of car weight if you are super-sizing at Burger King.
There you go! I've been road racingsince 92' and I see a lot of fat asses who do everything for a few ounces in their cars but not miss that McBreakfast or two.
Old 12-15-03, 05:30 PM
  #22  
1993 RX7 R1

 
Mr. Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by APEXL8T
There you go! I've been road racingsince 92' and I see a lot of fat asses who do everything for a few ounces in their cars but not miss that McBreakfast or two.
But I noticed that those overweight guys are pretty good racers. Maybe it is nature's way of giving the good drivers a weight penalty. Instead of a ballast for the car, they have to deal with the extra blubber
Old 10-19-04, 01:39 AM
  #23  
Will u do me a kindness?

iTrader: (2)
 
the_glass_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Parlor City, NY
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Always take a healthy poop before you get in the car!
Old 10-19-04, 03:02 AM
  #24  
Full Member

 
dices7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: arizona
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i cant get on to any of those sites. help
Old 10-19-04, 03:09 AM
  #25  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,024
Received 866 Likes on 615 Posts
Originally Posted by Flyrx7
The point I was trying to make is even Oprah could run a 5 second 40 if she shed like 60 pounds..... Frank
She'd have to shed the weight of BOTH ***-cheeks.


Quick Reply: Ultimate Weight Saving Link



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM.