3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

SMIC or H20/AI injection on stock boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 08:53 PM
  #1  
adamrs80's Avatar
Thread Starter
10-8-10
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
SMIC or H20/AI injection on stock boost?

My goal is to keep my stock engine with 40k running strong for as long as possible. It gets hot here in San Antonio and I want to keep the intake temp down. I like the cleaning aspect of the water injection and I know it will probably drop the IAT much more than even a nice sized & ducted SMIC. I don't want a problem with detonation if the boost ever gets to 11. Other than an HKS downpipe and K&N drop in filter my car is stock. I can also get a nice injection kit for $300 or so and not have to mess with remplacing the stock intercooler and spending $1000 or more. Seems like the right thing to do. Since I won't be relying on a large amount of water/alcohol I think the wiper tank. Is my thinking correct?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 09:56 PM
  #2  
Double_J's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
You can get a SMIC much cheaper if you do not buy name brand. Some say they are same others say they are not as good. It is like paying more money because your levi jeans have the red tab

If your engine is stock it is unlikely you will be running alcohol. I would imagine you would just use water, and that is pretty safe.

You might want to look at the other reliability mods first. I believe they are posted in the FAQ. Things like a better flowing rad.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 10:15 PM
  #3  
adamrs80's Avatar
Thread Starter
10-8-10
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Any reason why an SMIC would be a better move on a stock car? Looking at the coolingmist.com simple kit for $250. Much less pricey than an aquamist 1s and I think it will accomplish the same thing. I figured I would run Peak brand wiper fluid. It's about $1.50 a gallon and has some alcohol in it which I don't think can hurt.

I am one of those people who would probably buy a name brand intercooler. Reliability mods already done....
AST
HKS downpipe, wrapped.
Fan switch mod
pettit 185 deg. fan switch

Going to wait on radiator until summer.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #4  
bc_fd3s's Avatar
Canadiana... Eh?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: Canada
There is a GReddy SMIC for sale in the classifieds right now. Get on it!
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 10:22 PM
  #5  
adamrs80's Avatar
Thread Starter
10-8-10
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
That thing looks tiny and a little old.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #6  
bc_fd3s's Avatar
Canadiana... Eh?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: Canada
It's more than you need for stock engine with stock boost.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 02:58 AM
  #7  
SumTinWong's Avatar
Needs a tune
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Killeen TX
Or look up Theorie's DIY SMIC write-up. Something I was going to-do then got a good deal on an M2.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 03:02 AM
  #8  
sen2two's Avatar
Rx2 > FD
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 8
From: Florida, Orlando
water/meth injection post turbo! -or- water injection pre-turbo!

cant beat it...
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 09:35 AM
  #9  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
if you want colder intake temps, you can upgrade the intercooler (I'd keep a SMIC) but make sure you keep the stock airbox. there is a Mazda TSB that specifically warned against them all the way back in 95:



You can keep your engine bay temps down by installing an FC thermoswitch. I disagree that any kind of injection is necessary on a stock car. The main cooling problems with the stock car are the precat, the high trigger temps for the fans, the small intercooler core (stock ducting is fine) and the lack of dual oil coolers on most models.
Attached Thumbnails SMIC or H20/AI injection on stock boost?-intake_tsb.jpg  
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 10:02 AM
  #10  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by adamrs80
My goal is to keep my stock engine with 40k running strong for as long as possible. It gets hot here in San Antonio and I want to keep the intake temp down. I like the cleaning aspect of the water injection and I know it will probably drop the IAT much more than even a nice sized & ducted SMIC. I don't want a problem with detonation if the boost ever gets to 11. Other than an HKS downpipe and K&N drop in filter my car is stock. I can also get a nice injection kit for $300 or so and not have to mess with remplacing the stock intercooler and spending $1000 or more. Seems like the right thing to do. Since I won't be relying on a large amount of water/alcohol I think the wiper tank. Is my thinking correct?
IMO, it's not an either/or question. You shouldn't rely on a component like AI which can fail as your sole intake air cooling mechanism (outside of the stock IC). AI should be used (if used) in conjunction with a decent IC. I would add a decent IC before adding AI.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 10:45 AM
  #11  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,767
Likes: 796
From: Bay Area CA
Originally Posted by mahjik
imo, it's not an either/or question. You shouldn't rely on a component like ai which can fail as your sole intake air cooling mechanism (outside of the stock ic). Ai should be used (if used) in conjunction with a decent ic. I would add a decent ic before adding ai.

+1
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #12  
adamrs80's Avatar
Thread Starter
10-8-10
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by arghx
if you want colder intake temps, you can upgrade the intercooler (I'd keep a SMIC) but make sure you keep the stock airbox. there is a Mazda TSB that specifically warned against them all the way back in 95:



You can keep your engine bay temps down by installing an FC thermoswitch. I disagree that any kind of injection is necessary on a stock car. The main cooling problems with the stock car are the precat, the high trigger temps for the fans, the small intercooler core (stock ducting is fine) and the lack of dual oil coolers on most models.
In the 3rd post I stated that I have an FC thermoswitch, HKS downpipe, wrapped, and am using a k&n drop in filter with the stock airbox. I will not be raising the boost with a controller or any kind and I'm not planning on using any aftermarket intake or cats, or catback until my muffler rots out. I'll always keep the stock cats.

I just felt that the water injection in conjunction with the stock intercooler would be more effective than just an SMIC alone. From what I've it's more effective than an intercooler because it can actually lower IAT below ambient air temp which would be impossible with an air to air intercooler.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 07:54 PM
  #13  
adamrs80's Avatar
Thread Starter
10-8-10
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Mahjik
IMO, it's not an either/or question. You shouldn't rely on a component like AI which can fail as your sole intake air cooling mechanism (outside of the stock IC). AI should be used (if used) in conjunction with a decent IC. I would add a decent IC before adding AI.
It would be in conjunction with the stock intercooler. I figured stock IC with W/AI would be more effective than a smallish SMIC alone. I can't afford both so this seemed like the most cost effective way of dropping the IAT the most.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #14  
adamrs80's Avatar
Thread Starter
10-8-10
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
I wish I had the time and money to do a somewhat scientific analysis of stock IC, stock IC + water injection, and small-med SMIC with and without water injection. I still think that due to the huge cooling ability of water that the stock IC + water injection would give 2nd coolest IAT, 2nd only to some sort of SMIC with water injection.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 12:37 AM
  #15  
sen2two's Avatar
Rx2 > FD
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 8
From: Florida, Orlando
Originally Posted by adamrs80
I just felt that the water injection in conjunction with the stock intercooler would be more effective than just an SMIC alone. From what I've it's more effective than an intercooler because it can actually lower IAT below ambient air temp which would be impossible with an air to air intercooler.

exactly!

keep the stock intercooler, and no larger than an M5 (380cc?) after the turbo. and no larger than an M1 pre-turbo

you can use a mixture with meth in small amount with no tuning. but remember: pre-turbo = water ONLY!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:12 AM
  #16  
adamrs80's Avatar
Thread Starter
10-8-10
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
I was tossing around the idea of using wiper fluid but I'm fine with just water. I would be injecting post-turbo and using the smaller of the nozzles provided with the AEM kit. Unfortunately I don't have flow rates from them. That is something I would like to find out.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:50 AM
  #17  
adamrs80's Avatar
Thread Starter
10-8-10
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
AEM jet sizes are.... 130 cc/min, 315 cc/min, and 550 cc/min. This flow rate is with a 150 psi recirculation type pump.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #18  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
i agree w most of what has been posted in this thread.

there are advantages to upgrading your IC as well as advantages to doing the AI.

i like the AI because it will not only cool your combustion but will steam clean your engine. most engines i disassemble are seriously carbon impaired. when i say seriously that is precisely what i mean. rotors coated with up to a tenth of an inch of carbon. apex seal grooves often clogged w carbon to the point the seals are unable to move in their groove.

i disassembled my 4 year old 500 hp motor a year ago just to give it a look-see. i found almost no carbon. my compression after 4 years was still increasing and was at an all time high after 4 years and over 250 4th gear 2000-8000+ dyno runs and hundreds of street blasts.

my motor was clean and happy primarily because of 2 items:

1. AI

2. Deleted External Oil Pump and Premix as a replacement.

CARBON KILLS OUR MOTORS

NOT ONLY DOES IT CLOG THE CRUCIAL SEAL GROOVES THEREBY INHIBITING NECESSARY APEX SEAL MOVEMENT BUT IT RETAINS HEAT, ACTING LIKE A GLOWPLUG, AND CAN IGNITE GASOLINE BEFORE THE SPARKPLUG CAUSING LIFE THREATENING PREIGNITION.


as to what you should run as injectant...

i like water alone, methanol (alcohol) alone or a mix including windshield washer solvent.

FJO's in-house test car is a 1200 rwhp twin turbo Camaro. it has run "bug juice" for 4 years and is happy.

there's lots of info in the AI section.

you have picked good initial mods...

steam clean the carbon out of your motor while cooling the CCP,

howard coleman

Last edited by Howard Coleman; Dec 29, 2009 at 09:57 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
May 27, 2017 04:51 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 PM.