3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Shouldn't I be able to get higher boost than this

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 01:11 PM
  #1  
radkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
Shouldn't I be able to get higher boost than this

I had a new Pineapple Racing large race port motor put in recently. After tuning I am realizing that I am having a hard time reaching desired boost levels. No matter what the PFC is set for it never really goes over.8-.85 bar, even if the PFC is set to .9-.95 with relative duty cycles. My mods of importance are M2 intake, M2 med IC, DP, MP, Greddy PE exhaust. I was expecting to have a hard time keeping the boost down, but it has turned out to be the opposite. I have done the obvious check for boost leaks/bad vacume hoses. Is this motor so air hungry that the stock twins can't keep up? My secondary appeared to be leaking oil when it was pulled, but has always worked fine. What do YOU think?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 03:34 PM
  #2  
skunks's Avatar
I'm a CF and poop smith
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
what are you mods? also, you do know that your at the limits of efficiency with stock turbos right?
Lastly, PowerFC sucks at controlling boost, try a after market boost controller or perhaps a manual boost controller to get more boost (although i think your probally gonna pop your engine )
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 03:39 PM
  #3  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
First of all, do not rely on the PFC commander for accurate boost readings. It has been proven that it displays the incorrect readings. Do you have an independent boost gauge or are your numbers from the commander?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 05:21 PM
  #4  
radkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
My mods are in the 1st message. I have a manual boost guage that peaks at 11-12 and drops to 10 and stays. I seem to think I should be able to hold more than 10lbs steadily. I thought the stockers were good up till 14lbs. Why would I pop my engine trying to run a steady 12-13, or is it cause I have such a big port that the efficiency is lowered as far as lbs go.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 08:12 PM
  #5  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally posted by skunks
PowerFC sucks at controlling boost, try a after market boost controller or perhaps a manual boost controller to get more boost (although i think your probally gonna pop your engine )
Power FC does a GREAT JOB controlling boost for FDs with twin sequential turbos. I don't have problems with mine ('99 JDM twins). No spikes. My "high" boost setting is set to 0.90 kg/cm^2 (13.5 psi) on the primaries, and 0.90 kg/cm^2 (12.8 psi) on the secondaries. Wastegate solenoid duty cycles are 72% and 70%, respectively. Ryan's motor is well enriched with fuel, and has been tuned by Badog of Columbus.

Last edited by SleepR1; Mar 19, 2003 at 08:15 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 04:20 AM
  #6  
skunks's Avatar
I'm a CF and poop smith
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Originally posted by radkins
My mods are in the 1st message. I have a manual boost guage that peaks at 11-12 and drops to 10 and stays. I seem to think I should be able to hold more than 10lbs steadily. I thought the stockers were good up till 14lbs. Why would I pop my engine trying to run a steady 12-13, or is it cause I have such a big port that the efficiency is lowered as far as lbs go.

opps hehe, i forgot about the mods you listed. in anycase, i was thinking your were gonna pop your enigne cuz I'm assuming you want over .85 bar boost=12.5 psi boost and you dont have any fuel mods listed...
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 04:45 AM
  #7  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Bar, Atmosphere, kg/cm^2 conversion to psi units.

Bar is 14.5 psi. Atmosphere is 14.7 psi. kg/cm^2 is 14.2 psi. 0.85 kg/cm^2 = 12.07 psi, ~12.1 psi. You're confusing Atmosphere, Bar, and kg/cm^2, which is why you converted 0.85 kg/cm^2 incorrectly to 12.5 psi (you multiplied 0.85 kg/cm^2 by 14.7 psi, which is 1 Atmosphere, not 1 kg/cm^2).

Ryan has 1600 cc secondary injectors, upgraded fuel pressure regulator, upgraded fuel pump. If anything Ryan's motor runs a bit on the rich side.

Last edited by SleepR1; Mar 20, 2003 at 04:51 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 05:22 AM
  #8  
skunks's Avatar
I'm a CF and poop smith
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Originally posted by SleepR1
Bar, Atmosphere, kg/cm^2 conversion to psi units.

Bar is 14.5 psi. Atmosphere is 14.7 psi. kg/cm^2 is 14.2 psi. 0.85 kg/cm^2 = 12.07 psi, ~12.1 psi. You're confusing Atmosphere, Bar, and kg/cm^2, which is why you converted 0.85 kg/cm^2 incorrectly to 12.5 psi (you multiplied 0.85 kg/cm^2 by 14.7 psi, which is 1 Atmosphere, not 1 kg/cm^2).

Ryan has 1600 cc secondary injectors, upgraded fuel pressure regulator, upgraded fuel pump. If anything Ryan's motor runs a bit on the rich side.
With those fuel mods, he should be fine, but he did not have them listed. On another note, 14.7 and 14.5 is damn near the same thing (this really does not matter man!).

BTW: Ryan=radkins or rynberg???
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 05:51 PM
  #9  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally posted by skunks
With those fuel mods, he should be fine, but he did not have them listed. On another note, 14.7 and 14.5 is damn near the same thing (this really does not matter man!).

BTW: Ryan=radkins or rynberg???
radkins is Ryan. 14.2 psi = 1 kg/cm^2. That's different enough from 14.7 psi, which is the number you multiplied by to get 12.5 psi. The correct psi conversion for 0.85 kg/cm^2 is 12.1 psi.

Here's a handy online reference

http://www.onlineconversion.com/pressure.htm

Last edited by SleepR1; Mar 20, 2003 at 06:09 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
Bauer778
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Nov 4, 2015 04:42 PM
Clacor
Single Turbo RX-7's
19
Sep 11, 2015 08:36 PM
High_Carb_Diet
Power FC Forum
1
Sep 5, 2015 09:07 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 AM.