sequential turbos vs. twin turbos
#5
xx-Team-xx
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i beleive non-seq is a little bit laggier but will get the job done, seq u will feel the transition between the two turbo's and wont have as much lag as the non-seq.
EDIT: Also non-seq will get rid of ALOT OF VAUME HOSES lol....i think there will be 6 left, Correct me if im wrong
EDIT: Also non-seq will get rid of ALOT OF VAUME HOSES lol....i think there will be 6 left, Correct me if im wrong
Last edited by JDawG707; 05-02-06 at 12:20 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: new zealand
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
can you tell me what you want to know, do you want to know why people go from there twin turbo setup which is sequential, to non sequential? and if you want to learn about that then go to the top of the 3rd gen thread, and there you will see a search tab click on that and search away, there is **** loads of info out there, and i mean **** loads. goodluck, & if you have any questons after that feel free to ask.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
03-17-22 02:46 PM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM