3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Sequential and Non Sequential?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #1  
RX-Tex7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Sequential and Non Sequential?

Im still new to the FDs and j/w what sequential and non sequential meant? I've been lookin around like on robs website and stuff and still can't find what it means or anthing else.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:52 PM
  #2  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,901
Likes: 841
From: San Diego, CA
Seq: one turbo kicks in at 2900 RPM and second turbo comes on line at 4500 RPM. So after 4500 you are running both. 72 hoses keep this stock configuration pure form

non-seq: Both turbos come on at the same time. What time is up for debate. Some people claim 2900 RPMs others at 4300 RPMs. Mine kick in at 3800 RPMs. 6 hoses keep this configuration in check. Simplicity is the basic reason on why to do this mod.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #3  
s-thetikz's Avatar
4 rotor 964 lol
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: SoCA/ MA
im non-seq. and it runs at a steady 10 psi after 3500 rpm. every once in a while, my boost will hit 15 psi (running a pettit ecu) so i have an apex'i pfc ready to be tuned
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 03:09 PM
  #4  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Originally Posted by montego
Seq: one turbo kicks in at 2900 RPM and second turbo comes on line at 4500 RPM. So after 4500 you are running both. 72 hoses keep this stock configuration pure form

non-seq: Both turbos come on at the same time. What time is up for debate. Some people claim 2900 RPMs others at 4300 RPMs. Mine kick in at 3800 RPMs. 6 hoses keep this configuration in check. Simplicity is the basic reason on why to do this mod.
Some other notes:
Sequential is the stock setup. I get about 8psi of boost as low as 2000rpm, and 10psi by 2500rpm.

The other reason to go to non-sequential is because sequential isn't working right and it's not worth fixing. (In the owner's opinion, not mine - I'm a sequential purist).

Dave
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #5  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,901
Likes: 841
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by montego
Seq: one turbo kicks in at 2900 RPM and second turbo comes on line at 4500 RPM. So after 4500 you are running both. 72 hoses keep this stock configuration pure form

non-seq: Both turbos come on at the same time. What time is up for debate. Some people claim 2900 RPMs others at 4300 RPMs. Mine kick in at 3800 RPMs. 6 hoses keep this configuration in check. Simplicity is the basic reason on why to do this mod.

yeah degeesman pointed something out. Intead of "kicks in" I should had stated full boost.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 04:36 PM
  #6  
rotorypolo's Avatar
73 13B 4 port
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
I run sequential setup, around 13.5psi. I believe it is the way to go if it is a street driven car! I also did the seq. simplification mod, but it will not pass emission though.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 05:28 PM
  #7  
RX-Tex7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
So how do you do this mod and make it work properly and which one is the best one?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 05:30 PM
  #8  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by RX-Tex7
So how do you do this mod and make it work properly and which one is the best one?
If your car is working properly, just leave it alone. Don't rush into doing modifications just because someone else did. Learn the pros and cons of each modification before doing it.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 05:33 PM
  #9  
MakoRacing's Avatar
Where has my $ gone?
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 7
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by rynberg
If your car is working properly, just leave it alone. Don't rush into doing modifications just because someone else did. Learn the pros and cons of each modification before doing it.
agreed
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 05:48 PM
  #10  
Red Racer's Avatar
My bitch and the ladies..
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, Tn
Originally Posted by rynberg
If your car is working properly, just leave it alone. Don't rush into doing modifications just because someone else did. Learn the pros and cons of each modification before doing it.
Besides it is going to break soon enough. You can almost set your watch by it.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #11  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
The simplified sequential does not change anything that control the turbos. It only removes all of the emissions components that crowd around the sequential system. In other words, it removes the non-turbo parts of the rats nest and UIM.

Dave
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #12  
IceN's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: austin, tx
so which setup nets more power, quicker spool, faster et's
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 09:30 PM
  #13  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
They are all the same above 4500rpm.

Check out the dyno comparator at www.zeroglabs.com to see how the non-seq compares to seq below 4500rpm. I believe that down real low (under 3500) the sequential is better, but around 4000-4500 the non-sequential is a little more. At and above 4500 it doesn't matter.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Jun 3, 2024 03:25 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Feb 27, 2021 02:54 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
39
Oct 4, 2015 08:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.