3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Resonnated midpipe or midpipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-04, 02:51 PM
  #1  
Rotary addict since 86

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
WanKeL FD RX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Resonnated midpipe or midpipe

I've read a little about this subject, but i'm not sure of the right buy.

My mods are intake, downpipe and catback, and i'll buy a power fc + midpipe this winter. But, now i'm not sure if i'm going to buy a resonnated one or not. I know the difference are the sound, but i personnally don't care if it's loud. What are you guys using, and what's the best to use.

I need advices about the sound, and performance, does it make a difference of performance between the regular midpipe or the resonnated?!

Ps : I've searched for those who are going to tell : SEARRCCHHH!

Thanks in advance

Max
Old 10-05-04, 03:18 PM
  #2  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by WanKeL FD RX-7
I need advices about the sound, and performance, does it make a difference of performance between the regular midpipe or the resonnated?!
None that you'll ever notice. Just get a resonated one, you'll be happier in the end.
Old 10-05-04, 03:43 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
silver93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: winston-salem, nc
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
resonated. it's just obscenely without one -
Old 10-05-04, 04:18 PM
  #4  
Full Member

 
Single7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The boonies of TX
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Wankel,

Performance wise, it depends on the type of resonnated midpipe you are using. If you are using a straight through design (vs. a baffled design), performance should suffer only marginally compared to a midpipe. A baffled design may hinder the velocity to the point where the midpipe is no longer a true 3.0" midpipe. The major issue with a resonator is the turbulence it causes (thus slowing down velocity of the exhaust gases). The turbulence helps "mellow" out the sound a little. Now how much in real world terms does a resonated midpipe actually hurt the overall performance of your vehicle...probably very little to only slightly.

Is it worth the extra $100 to $150... if you're getting old like me... it's worth the conversation you can have with the person next to you. It's worth not aggravating my neighbors when I drive home late at night. It's worth being able to make an order at a drive through window without turning off my car. It's worth not sounding exactly like a lawn mower....just sort of like a lawn mower .

When I first got my car, I was willing to sacrifice all creature comforts for every ounce of horse power. Nothing wrong with that. If this is your daily driver... I would recommend otherwise. You'll find it very nice to be able to listen to your radio without having to turn it up to MAXIMUM. You'll find it nice to have a cup holder one day. You'll find it nice to actually use A/C. But to each his own. You couldn't have reasoned with me four years ago to go with a resonated midpipe... but now? I wouldn't have it any other way.
Old 10-05-04, 04:37 PM
  #5  
FEARED

 
Black97VR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had full exhaust with twins and it honestly didn't seem that loud with an unresonated midpipe. I didn't even notice the change in sound until higher revs. I had Pettit Downpipe, RX-7 Store Midpipe, and GReddy SP catback.

Now with the single the noise might start to get annoying. We shall seee...
Old 10-05-04, 05:45 PM
  #6  
Rotary addict since 86

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
WanKeL FD RX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
thanks a lot for the comments, this is what i wanted to hear. I'm 18 years old. Maybe i'll start with the one without resonnator because i don't really care how loud it will be since it isn't my daily driver.

Max
Old 10-05-04, 06:25 PM
  #7  
Racing is Life.....

 
Beast From The East's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm unfamiliar with Canada road laws, but you should research that. The sound of an FD with a straight through is louder than the 95 decibel limit. I found that the resonated was the way to go without losing my hearing. If it was track only and on an unlimit noise day, then your good, but some tracks also have 99 decibel sound limits for non-race car days so you'll get flagged (again, I don't know what it's like in Canada and don't know your plans for the car).
Old 10-05-04, 07:40 PM
  #8  
Rotary addict since 86

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
WanKeL FD RX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Black97VR4
I had full exhaust with twins and it honestly didn't seem that loud with an unresonated midpipe. I didn't even notice the change in sound until higher revs. I had Pettit Downpipe, RX-7 Store Midpipe, and GReddy SP catback.

Now with the single the noise might start to get annoying. We shall seee...
I'm surprised because the greddy sp has a very loud sound, my dad has this exhaust on his 93 rx7 .. I have a HKS muffler and it's quieter a little bit.

at idle, and low rpms, am i going to make too much noise with the non-resonnated midpipe ? Or if it's only on higher rpms that it will be loud ?

Max




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.