3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Rebuild?

Old Jan 7, 2005 | 12:07 AM
  #1  
dark_controller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Rebuild?

I was talking with this mechanic who specializes in import performance and I mentioned to him that I was thinking about getting an RX-7. He said that they werent very good cars as daily drivers, which is what i want for in the summer. He also said that you have to rebuild the engines every 60,000 miles. Is that true?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 12:29 AM
  #2  
diablone's Avatar
.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 26
From: -
Yes, exactly at 60k. Seriously...no, it's not true. Do a search, about 500 people have asked the same question as you. If you're looking for something thats cheap, reliable and able to take alot of beating, the RX-7 is wrong for you.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 12:31 AM
  #3  
dark_controller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
what would you recommend?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 12:37 AM
  #4  
littlemilla3's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 1
From: Brea, CA
Originally Posted by dark_controller
what would you recommend?
a civic
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 12:42 AM
  #5  
dark_controller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Im lookin for something with more performance......this is going to be a car that im only going to drive like 3 months out of the year.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 12:55 AM
  #6  
jeffrored92's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Australia
Dude at the shop I take my car says he's seen FD's go over 300'000km on the stock engine.

Hmmm that does seem a bit high maybe it was 200'000. Either way, it's pretty good. I've only had mine for about 3 months, so can't really comment. I guess if you look after it really well, then theres no reason a stock engine couldn't rack up the kms. Unfortunately, when buying a 10+ year old used car there is almost no way of knowing if the car has been looked after well. And people tend to thrash them a bit because lets face it - it's not a granny car. So it's kind of like a lucky dip. Just make sure you can afford the prize
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 12:58 AM
  #7  
fallenengel's Avatar
rain + FD = oops
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: so Cal
rx7

i hate to say this but the seven is not for everybody. You have to be willing to tinker, crank, pull, and play with it a lot. I can't imagine owning one of these and not knowing how to work on it. You have to know how to troubleshoot it and fix it unless you have mucho dinero and can have the mechanic look at it. The engine is not bulletproof, nor will it ever be. It can be made quite reliable as discussed on this forum and extensively on www.scuderiaciriani.com. But if you want quick, cheap, dirty fun the rx7 is not it.

however, i must say this: It is the best all-round performance car ever built. An engineering marvel to this day. The rx8 is a vegetable compared to the fd.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vartok
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
16
Oct 8, 2015 04:49 PM
NickNac113
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
13
Oct 1, 2015 09:25 PM
musker
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Oct 1, 2015 05:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.