3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Rebuild?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-05, 12:07 AM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
dark_controller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rebuild?

I was talking with this mechanic who specializes in import performance and I mentioned to him that I was thinking about getting an RX-7. He said that they werent very good cars as daily drivers, which is what i want for in the summer. He also said that you have to rebuild the engines every 60,000 miles. Is that true?
Old 01-07-05, 12:29 AM
  #2  
.

iTrader: (2)
 
diablone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: -
Posts: 2,185
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
Yes, exactly at 60k. Seriously...no, it's not true. Do a search, about 500 people have asked the same question as you. If you're looking for something thats cheap, reliable and able to take alot of beating, the RX-7 is wrong for you.
Old 01-07-05, 12:31 AM
  #3  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
dark_controller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what would you recommend?
Old 01-07-05, 12:37 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
littlemilla3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dark_controller
what would you recommend?
a civic
Old 01-07-05, 12:42 AM
  #5  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
dark_controller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im lookin for something with more performance......this is going to be a car that im only going to drive like 3 months out of the year.
Old 01-07-05, 12:55 AM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
jeffrored92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dude at the shop I take my car says he's seen FD's go over 300'000km on the stock engine.

Hmmm that does seem a bit high maybe it was 200'000. Either way, it's pretty good. I've only had mine for about 3 months, so can't really comment. I guess if you look after it really well, then theres no reason a stock engine couldn't rack up the kms. Unfortunately, when buying a 10+ year old used car there is almost no way of knowing if the car has been looked after well. And people tend to thrash them a bit because lets face it - it's not a granny car. So it's kind of like a lucky dip. Just make sure you can afford the prize
Old 01-07-05, 12:58 AM
  #7  
rain + FD = oops

 
fallenengel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: so Cal
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rx7

i hate to say this but the seven is not for everybody. You have to be willing to tinker, crank, pull, and play with it a lot. I can't imagine owning one of these and not knowing how to work on it. You have to know how to troubleshoot it and fix it unless you have mucho dinero and can have the mechanic look at it. The engine is not bulletproof, nor will it ever be. It can be made quite reliable as discussed on this forum and extensively on www.scuderiaciriani.com. But if you want quick, cheap, dirty fun the rx7 is not it.

however, i must say this: It is the best all-round performance car ever built. An engineering marvel to this day. The rx8 is a vegetable compared to the fd.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vartok
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
16
10-08-15 04:49 PM
NickNac113
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
13
10-01-15 09:25 PM
musker
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
10-01-15 05:58 PM



Quick Reply: Rebuild?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 PM.