3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

RE-Amemiya Wing Spoiler Comparison: wet-carbon vs dry-carbon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-23, 10:03 PM
  #1  
. . . . . . . . . . .

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
R3DLINE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: GTA
Posts: 57
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
ON RE-Amemiya Wing Spoiler Comparison: wet-carbon vs dry-carbon

Given there is very limited info on this Japanese gem even on RE-Amemiya website I figured I purchase both and share my discovery with the RX-7 community.
So here it goes...

Both wings are literally identical in shape and form. And both were ordered on the same day 11 months ago. The wet-carbon version arrived first and then I waited more to receive the dry version. Today it finally arrived from Japan.



Notice how the cost of shipping went up by 47.05% during 2022.


Dry carbon

Dry carbon close-up

Wet carbon

Wet carbon close-up

Side by side

Side by side


Price source: "http://www.re-amemiya.co.jp/commodity/?model=3&cotype=2&pid=880ee17c"
Old 03-02-23, 11:37 PM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast
 
mr2peak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 1,019
Received 1,040 Likes on 742 Posts
So $2,000 for 1.5lbs of weight savings. Fun to see them side by side, the dry does look cool. I wonder if there's a strength difference as well? The more epoxy used between the carbon, the weaker the part usually is. I say we test it, rx7club must know
Old 03-03-23, 08:43 AM
  #3  
. . . . . . . . . . .

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
R3DLINE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: GTA
Posts: 57
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Unfortunately, dry carbon is more complicated and time-consuming, so it’s typically reserved for very expensive parts designed for race teams. Dry carbon is also significantly stronger, as there are fewer irregularities compared to wet carbon and less resin used.
The following 3 users liked this post by R3DLINE:
Federighi (03-07-23), mr2peak (03-03-23), Wompa164 (03-03-23)
Old 09-24-23, 05:21 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Federighi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: California
Posts: 367
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
I remember when you purchased, did you ever get to install?
Old 09-25-23, 10:36 AM
  #5  
. . . . . . . . . . .

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
R3DLINE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: GTA
Posts: 57
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
No
Old 09-25-23, 03:00 PM
  #6  
rotary amuse

iTrader: (12)
 
ZumSpeedRX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,878
Received 237 Likes on 124 Posts
Understood on how dry can be a more solid element vs wet assuming solid chassis mount to chassis mount vs flexy rear hatch mount, but you'd need to be cutting to the bone with the low hanging weight loss fruit already sorted (seat, battery, lexan, wiring, carpet, diet, etc) to justify (from a performance perspective) a 1.5 pound weight savings against a $2,000 investment

Regardless - both are awesome pieces!

Post pictures of the car you're throwing it on with the before and after install please

Last edited by ZumSpeedRX-7; 09-25-23 at 03:02 PM.
Old 09-25-23, 04:13 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Federighi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: California
Posts: 367
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Originally Posted by ZumSpeedRX-7
Understood on how dry can be a more solid element vs wet assuming solid chassis mount to chassis mount vs flexy rear hatch mount, but you'd need to be cutting to the bone with the low hanging weight loss fruit already sorted (seat, battery, lexan, wiring, carpet, diet, etc) to justify (from a performance perspective) a 1.5 pound weight savings against a $2,000 investment

Regardless - both are awesome pieces!

Post pictures of the car you're throwing it on with the before and after install please
I'm looking to buy this and respectfully disagree Zum. You'll have to excuse my purist oath (ha) but my jdm tuner car philosophy (which is all this boy racer hobby is at the end of the day) is all about building something loyal to the appropriate jdm style to serve as a homage / tribute to Japanese tuning culture. Let's not forget that one of the main and most important merits of JDM culture is style. So for me, there really isn't much more to it. It is what it is they say.

I know this concept isn't lost on you, but it's the whole 'add lightness' thing that increases every aspect of a vehicles' performance. Which is ultimately what Japanese auto makers have been striving for (and achieving with success for years!) up until this last decade or so; but it's not their fault the market has drastically changed priorities. My car is ultimately just a street car at the end of the day and you can only responsibly use so much power on the streets before putting life / property in danger. For me, the -2lbs savings is totally worth it because I personally am more about reducing weight as opposed to adding horsepower. It's the 'to each their own, the heart wants what it wants' cliché. Apparently I'm full of 'em today, ha


Old 09-25-23, 07:22 PM
  #8  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
Valkyrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Japanabama
Posts: 4,731
Received 88 Likes on 64 Posts
Damn, over 900 CAD for shipping. You could have almost flown to Chiba and taken them home in your luggage for that much...

This is about what I would have expected as for as the weight difference.. Significant, but not economically justifiable.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fd3s777
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
04-02-05 05:34 PM
rotaryextreme
Interior / Exterior / Audio
12
11-18-04 12:05 AM



Quick Reply: RE-Amemiya Wing Spoiler Comparison: wet-carbon vs dry-carbon



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 AM.