Racing Beat and K&N - Damn!
08-09-02, 05:21 PM
#1
Below- "Esses" at RA
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tampa Bay, FL area.....
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Racing Beat and K&N - Damn!
Finally got around to putting in my Racing Beat Intake and replaced the paper filter with the K&N at the same time; bought them both for 40 out of the classifieds.
All's I can say is - DAMN; I've either lost my mind or this is a REAL good way to get some cheap HP; just when I was sort of getting used to my FD's speed/power, this addition seems to have given me a real noticeable gain.
Unbelievable for $40. Sounds better too.
Any comments, as in has anyone else done this and noticed a sizeable gain? Definitely a cheap mod that everyone should do that has a basically stock FD like me.
David
All's I can say is - DAMN; I've either lost my mind or this is a REAL good way to get some cheap HP; just when I was sort of getting used to my FD's speed/power, this addition seems to have given me a real noticeable gain.
Unbelievable for $40. Sounds better too.
Any comments, as in has anyone else done this and noticed a sizeable gain? Definitely a cheap mod that everyone should do that has a basically stock FD like me.
David
08-09-02, 05:23 PM
#2
Below- "Esses" at RA
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tampa Bay, FL area.....
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Almost forgot
TTPowered had sent me a tip on getting the "how-to" instructions off of Mazdatrix.com; thanks again TT. Full photos etc. made it a lot easier.
08-09-02, 07:09 PM
#3
Speed Mach Go Go Go
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
K&N filter is a no brainer
It's an excelent concept. The bad thing is that it's cheap material, too thin and flimsy, and will get brittle, crack and break from the heat.
It would be have been awsome made from Carbon Fiber or even fiberglass.
It would be have been awsome made from Carbon Fiber or even fiberglass.
08-09-02, 08:15 PM
#5
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its a waste of dough imho. mine cracked to bits as it is such cheapo plastic...finally went with the ghetto pettit intake...made a noticable difference when combined with my n1 dual.
j
j
08-10-02, 07:16 AM
#6
Below- "Esses" at RA
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tampa Bay, FL area.....
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal Intakes?
What are you referring to? Is the real deal the same as the "ghetto intakes" and what are they?
I do agree that the RB is a cheap piece of crap..... when I actually saw what they have the ***** to charge 97$ for I was amazed........must be all that R and D work that went into the design......Hah........
I'm supposing the dual "round" Kand N's like I see in so many photos?
I guess the only question is what difference does it make to be sucking in all that hot engine compartment air versus from the front air dam?
Any opinions?
I do agree that the RB is a cheap piece of crap..... when I actually saw what they have the ***** to charge 97$ for I was amazed........must be all that R and D work that went into the design......Hah........
I'm supposing the dual "round" Kand N's like I see in so many photos?
I guess the only question is what difference does it make to be sucking in all that hot engine compartment air versus from the front air dam?
Any opinions?
Trending Topics
08-10-02, 02:33 PM
#9
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
m2 makes a great intake...pettit makes an excellent intake in terms of function but it looks home made....
rotary reliability and racing is also beginning to manufacture intakes...theirs are almost a blend between pettit and m2 in terms of looks and function.
jason
rotary reliability and racing is also beginning to manufacture intakes...theirs are almost a blend between pettit and m2 in terms of looks and function.
jason
08-10-02, 08:48 PM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nor Cali, Sonoma County
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE inlet temps...
just as cars run stronger on a cool or wet day the inlet charge temp does make a difference. I have forgotten the formula however, it is something like for every 10 degrees of lower inlet temp you gain 1% horsepower. If any one has formula please post it for all to gleen. This is also only one reason that upgraded IC help our TT'S.... as is reduced backpressure on turbos ans Quality of air charge.. Carter
08-10-02, 10:47 PM
#11
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had the K/N filter with the RB inlet for a while. I also paid $97 plus $60 for the filter....I was stock and wanted something - and that was cheaper than all the other intakes. I was very happy with it - quality sucked but so do many of the intakes that sell for $350. If you are planning on staying with mild bolt-ons (intake, exhaust, and dp) then stay with the RB. Even with a ecu and upgraded Blitz or Greddy smic you can keep the RB intake and put down some serious numbers and keep a stock look. I'm all about cheap mods
I'm sure it's good for 7-10 rwhp.
I'm sure it's good for 7-10 rwhp.
08-11-02, 09:05 PM
#12
2 babies - no back seats
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: N. Wilm., Delaware?
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Works great for me. Good kick for the $. Just don't silicon it together. You'll be sorry the first time you need to remove the intake or take out the intercooler.
