View Poll Results: When I went sequential ..............
When I went non sequential, my sequential system was working properly



20
68.97%
When I went non sequential, my sequential system was NOT working properly



9
31.03%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll
Poll: for those who went non sequential
Remember that the core of the sequential turbo system only uses the following solenoids:
Turbo control vacuum
Turbo control pressure
Charge control
Charge relief
Plus the vacuum and pressure chambers as well as the two check valves. Then there are two factory electronic boost controllers which are not "necessary' strictly speaking:
wastegate solenoid
precontrol solenoid
when you do a simplified sequential (or non sequential), you can at least eliminate:
switching solenoid
relief solenoid
fuel pressure/hot start solenoid
evaporative purge solenoid
double throttle control solenoid
air control valve
smog pump
charcoal canister
PCV valve if equipped
split air pipe
EGR solenoid, switch, pipe, etc
provided that you are not concerned about passing visual and tailpipe emissions tests. And if you are hardcore about simplification you can remove the ISC valve and thermowax which will impact idle. OMP removal also reduces plumbing. Both sequential and non sequential don't have to be anywhere near as complicated. You can still clean things up a lot if you choose to remain sequential.
As for Mazda's engineers: I don't have any problems with the way the system was designed overall. If the components were built better there wouldn't be many problems. But they weren't beefed up--they look just like the check valves and solenoids in the 1st and 2nd gen non turbo cars which were not subjected to the same amount of heat.
Turbo control vacuum
Turbo control pressure
Charge control
Charge relief
Plus the vacuum and pressure chambers as well as the two check valves. Then there are two factory electronic boost controllers which are not "necessary' strictly speaking:
wastegate solenoid
precontrol solenoid
when you do a simplified sequential (or non sequential), you can at least eliminate:
switching solenoid
relief solenoid
fuel pressure/hot start solenoid
evaporative purge solenoid
double throttle control solenoid
air control valve
smog pump
charcoal canister
PCV valve if equipped
split air pipe
EGR solenoid, switch, pipe, etc
provided that you are not concerned about passing visual and tailpipe emissions tests. And if you are hardcore about simplification you can remove the ISC valve and thermowax which will impact idle. OMP removal also reduces plumbing. Both sequential and non sequential don't have to be anywhere near as complicated. You can still clean things up a lot if you choose to remain sequential.
As for Mazda's engineers: I don't have any problems with the way the system was designed overall. If the components were built better there wouldn't be many problems. But they weren't beefed up--they look just like the check valves and solenoids in the 1st and 2nd gen non turbo cars which were not subjected to the same amount of heat.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Jun 3, 2024 03:25 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Feb 27, 2021 02:54 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM






