3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: which front end ~
93 - 95 spec
32.55%
99+ spec
67.45%
Voters: 255. You may not vote on this poll

Poll ~ 93-95 or 99 spec front end?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-06, 11:11 PM
  #51  
RIP Creamsicle!

iTrader: (9)
 
eo2am's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oxnard
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
99 all the way
Old 11-12-06, 11:15 PM
  #52  
T O R Q U E!

iTrader: (24)
 
mdpalmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: far far away
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^ will you quit posting your signature! Dammit, who cares about rx7s when that kind of crap is in your face BTW, I would still like to see your "collection" FWIW, I also feel that the "brick" was an add on, so-to-speak. The FDs body is like a drop of water... and that "brick" sure as hell is not part of the basic design... me thinks
Old 11-12-06, 11:27 PM
  #53  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,525
Received 538 Likes on 325 Posts
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
You guys are ******* nuts, and have absolutely no taste whatsoever. You'd NEVER see a nice sportscar with that stupid assed BRICK stuck in the nose. It's an absolute abomination that some designer should be SHOT for, or at least spend the rest of his career pushing a broom.

Oh yeah, the first silver car is MINE. No offense intended to Aristo, who owns the second car (which on ballance is a nicer car than mine), but the plateless '99 looks WAAAYYY better. It follows the NATURAL lines on the car.

Go look up pictures of Corvettes, Astons, Ferrari's, Porsches... whatever decent sports car you can find, and show me the one with a big ******* brick for a liscense plate stuck in it. Most are designed as though you won't be putting a liscense plate on it, because most people with nice cars DON'T.
well, then I must be ******* nuts .

I decided to keep the plate b/c for years when I used to cruise with Ihor in his silver FD and 99 spec plateless front bumper, I got sick of looking in my rearview and seeing his car smiling at me. Not very intimidating, in my opinion of course
Old 11-12-06, 11:32 PM
  #54  
FEED me

iTrader: (26)
 
TRISPEEDFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smiling, haha!
Old 11-13-06, 12:14 AM
  #55  
DJK
Full Member

iTrader: (2)
 
DJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Gulfport MS
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think that the "smiling effect" is as prevelant in the darker colored cars (Black or Montego Blue), but that's just my opinion.
Old 11-13-06, 12:35 AM
  #56  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
spoolin1012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was in your spot about a month ago. But I had to go stock 99' because its stock and I was going for a stock look. I haven't put a plate on mine yet but still looks very nice. Super glad I didn't stick with the stock 93' bumper. .
PS: In my opinion, plateless 99' just doesn't look right for some reason, Id rather go Mazdaspeed or something other then plateless 99'.

Old 11-13-06, 12:37 AM
  #57  
FEED me

iTrader: (26)
 
TRISPEEDFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DJK
I don't think that the "smiling effect" is as prevelant in the darker colored cars (Black or Montego Blue), but that's just my opinion.

True, I see what you're saying here. The smiling effect is great on lighter colors! That black car up there with no plate does look good.
Old 11-13-06, 01:44 AM
  #58  
Goodfalla Engine Complete

iTrader: (28)
 
Monkman33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 3,233
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
Find me one "nice car" with a plate brick in the front of. Look up the C6 Corvette, a Viper, and Aston Martin, and a Ferrari 360, and tell me what you DON'T see stuck in the front of it.

Not to be rude, but the bumper has an indentation on those vehicles. At least the vette for sure. and it comes with a cover that gives the front end a smooth flowing design for states that do not require a front plate. not many cars have a protrusion to mount the front plate. at least not high end sports cars.

I like the look both ways, however, for aero purposes, I would go without. For legality purposes, I would go with. I think it all depends.

Now that point that I see being made... without being said, is that the front end without the plate looks like it needs something. It seems to me that it is like a large canvas, waiting for a small accent. Perhaps a flying M logo? or efini badge woutl break up the monotony of the large sloped nose?

I am just trying point out why the plateless look tends to lead to a bland reaction. the plate brick breaks up a large smooth area on a car that otherwise has very purposeful lines and not a whole lot of large surfaces without some sort of curve or accent or texture.

just my .02
Old 11-13-06, 05:59 AM
  #59  
sold--no longer in debt

 
cloead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,658
Received 11 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
You honestly believe that?! Sorry, 'shopped out your plate, and the car looks twice as good. NOBODY puts liscense plates on the front of nice cars, becaus ethey ALL look better without them
IMHO, it looks a lot better WITH the plate. I hate the plateless-99spec look. I used to think the brick was ugly and then it just started to grow on me to the point where I had to have it.

Really sorry you disagree, and apparently we are all idiots for having our own taste? If I ever buy another fd, it will definitly have the 99 spec front end w/ the front plate.

Plus, I never got pulled over for front plate anymore!--That used to be really annoying too.
Old 11-13-06, 07:17 AM
  #60  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,095
Received 514 Likes on 288 Posts
looking at FD noses there are two considerations:

how they look

how they work.

how they look is an aesthetic question you like green i like blue. o k so most of you like a big nose w lots of intake area. i happen to like the smaller original nose w the R1 splitter. if those who have posted/voted are representative of the whole i am in the minority.

then there's how they work.

mazda worked very hard on all aspects of the FD to make as high performance a sportscar as possible and that included aero. they tried to have as small a frontal intake area as possible. less drag. ALOT less drag. what they apparently didn't know was what a thermal disaster the engine package was. (they actually needed more intake). so in 99 or thereabouts they came out w the new nose w more intake.

in a more perfect world they would have straightened out the heat issues and kept the low drag nose... put a single turbo on etc but it is not a perfect world. mazda took the easy road and changed the nose for engineering issues not asthetics.

many of us have reengineered our cars and don't have heat as an issue. i run AI alcohol injection and am trying to get my pre-turbo egts above 1200 degrees and am making over 500 hp. heat isn't an issue if you straighten out the powersystem. so i don't need to put more drag on my car. i also don't need a Hummer type nose because my intercooler (ASP large) is in the stock location. not blocking my radiator. not contributing to front weight. not sticking out to be punched in by every rock. i do run 2 oil coolers and i consider the 93 ducting to be excellent.

delighted to be part of the minority here.

howard coleman
Old 11-13-06, 08:46 AM
  #61  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
Firstly, I fail to see how the presence of a liscense plate, let alone a big box to mount it on prevents the '99 nose from looking like it's "smiling". While I really don't notice the smile, I can see how the main radiator opening has a "smile" shape. However, the liscense plate on the OE model DOESN'T COVER the radiator opening shape, so I don't see how it's any different. IT'S THE SAME SHAPE. It just doesn't make any sense.

If you think the 93-95 bumper is better looking than the '99, I can totally accept that. I like the 93-95 too, but do feel that he signals became dated, and therefore dated the car. However, if you like the '99, if absolutely BAFFLES me that anyone would think the plate brick looks "more natural", "more normal", "less cheap", "less smiley".... let alone simply "better". The NATURAL shape of the nose is the shape w/out the plate brick. That's plainly obvious. Just like if you added the brick to the 93-95, the natural shape would be the way it is without it. It's an add-on.

This is backed up by the fact that virtually every vehicle on the road, and particularly the nicer ones like the brand I've mentioned, are styled w/out a liscense plate, and particularly any sort of built-in provision for a plate that interrupts the natural lines of the car. THAT'S how the "non cheap" brands do it, and "not cheap" is as not cheap does.
Old 11-13-06, 08:52 AM
  #62  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
No they don't.

The C5 vette had a hole for a plate, and they gave you a plug to run instead if you didn't want to run it. You'll note that the designers made no such provision for it on the C6 model.

There's no plate box on a Ferrari 360. None on Astons. None on most Porsches. You can PUT a plate on there, but there's no built-in provision for one that mucks up the lines of the car...

You guys will note also that EVERY '99-based aftermarket bumper on the market has no plate box. FEED, CWest, etc. none. Not even the Mazda GTC.

The "blank space" on the '99 plateless bumper isn't any more of a blank space than the 93-95 bumper... you can mount an emblem on either one just the same.


Originally Posted by Monkman33
Not to be rude, but the bumper has an indentation on those vehicles. At least the vette for sure. and it comes with a cover that gives the front end a smooth flowing design for states that do not require a front plate. not many cars have a protrusion to mount the front plate. at least not high end sports cars.

I like the look both ways, however, for aero purposes, I would go without. For legality purposes, I would go with. I think it all depends.

Now that point that I see being made... without being said, is that the front end without the plate looks like it needs something. It seems to me that it is like a large canvas, waiting for a small accent. Perhaps a flying M logo? or efini badge woutl break up the monotony of the large sloped nose?

I am just trying point out why the plateless look tends to lead to a bland reaction. the plate brick breaks up a large smooth area on a car that otherwise has very purposeful lines and not a whole lot of large surfaces without some sort of curve or accent or texture.

just my .02
Old 11-13-06, 09:00 AM
  #63  
Lets Go Hokies!

iTrader: (5)
 
afterburn27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I'm another fan of the stock '99 spec bumper with the 'shoebox'. It just looks goofy without it.

I do miss the '93-'98 bumper though. I like both just the same, but the '99 spec has larger openings for radiator and oil cooler flow. So that's what I went with.
Old 11-13-06, 09:39 AM
  #64  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HAHAHA

SO i guess thats what

99 plate holder - 2382328372

99 no plate holder - 3

LOL

Its not hard to know what looks better. Not whats "SUPPOSED" to look better.

::shakes head::
Old 11-13-06, 11:14 AM
  #65  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (6)
 
7_rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,139
Received 37 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by ulost2my7
HAHAHA

SO i guess thats what

99 plate holder - 2382328372

99 no plate holder - 3

LOL

Its not hard to know what looks better. Not whats "SUPPOSED" to look better.

::shakes head::
Old 11-13-06, 11:22 AM
  #66  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Didnt you buy a 99 front WITH plate holder??



Btw, hit me up on aim tonight, i gotta ask you something yo.
Old 11-13-06, 12:16 PM
  #67  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
HAHAHA

And I quote P.T. Barnum who said "nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the american public".


Originally Posted by ulost2my7
HAHAHA

SO i guess thats what

99 plate holder - 2382328372

99 no plate holder - 3

LOL

Its not hard to know what looks better. Not whats "SUPPOSED" to look better.

::shakes head::
Old 11-13-06, 12:29 PM
  #68  
Senior Member

 
jmadams74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I love this post because of the passion it demonstrates among RX7 owners! I think all of us plate vs noplate folks would join hands in a moment to protect our RX7 marque. Having said that, I suspect there is a silent majority out here who know it's just wrong to tie a shoebox on the front of a car (lol, sorry couldn't resist). I mean, maybe it would look good with a Papa Johns sign on top too? Another poll??
Old 11-13-06, 12:38 PM
  #69  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,525
Received 538 Likes on 325 Posts
Originally Posted by jmadams74
I love this post because of the passion it demonstrates among RX7 owners! I think all of us plate vs noplate folks would join hands in a moment to protect our RX7 marque. Having said that, I suspect there is a silent majority out here who know it's just wrong to tie a shoebox on the front of a car (lol, sorry couldn't resist). I mean, maybe it would look good with a Papa Johns sign on top too? Another poll??
In three years of having my front bumper mounted, I've never had a single person tell me that my front bumper looked cheap/shitty/ghetto.



Re: protecting the RX-7 marque, we should all focus this energy on the people ripping out the hearts of the car and dropping in camaro motors. There, I said it.
Old 11-13-06, 12:55 PM
  #70  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
Rich,
I don't think your car looks cheap/shitty, and so long as there's a plate on there it minimizes the affect of the brick (because a liscense plate is a brick anyway).

However, I think all sportscars (and most other cars) look decidedly better w/ out liscense plates as a hard and fast rule.... and without a plate, there's no reason for that brick/shoe box, and further, it just isn't a natural part of the cars shape.... and I do think that by comparison, Mfanto's car for instance is an example of how it should naturally look. Those are the natural lines of the car... and most certainly can't see how the car looks cheap or goofy this way:
Attached Thumbnails Poll ~ 93-95 or 99 spec front end?-mfanto_2.jpg  

Last edited by ptrhahn; 11-13-06 at 01:19 PM.
Old 11-13-06, 01:33 PM
  #71  
Full Member

 
RX7Resurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: GA
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99! Recently received the parts and will be installed soon.
Old 11-13-06, 01:44 PM
  #72  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,525
Received 538 Likes on 325 Posts
Maybe I'm hung up on it, but the damn thing looks like it's grinning
Old 11-13-06, 01:48 PM
  #73  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
In three years of having my front bumper mounted, I've never had a single person tell me that my front bumper looked cheap/shitty/ghetto.



Re: protecting the RX-7 marque, we should all focus this energy on the people ripping out the hearts of the car and dropping in camaro motors. There, I said it.

No one will say that cause it looks gorgeous, doesnt look like an imitation or an ebay style bumper.
Old 11-13-06, 02:11 PM
  #74  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
OKAY... but how is that NOT the case with the liscense plate???? The plate doesn't cover the "Grin"... it just looks like it's grinning with a little Hitler moustache...


Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Maybe I'm hung up on it, but the damn thing looks like it's grinning
Attached Thumbnails Poll ~ 93-95 or 99 spec front end?-nose_shape.jpg  

Last edited by ptrhahn; 11-13-06 at 02:26 PM.
Old 11-13-06, 02:25 PM
  #75  
2/4 wheel cornering fiend

 
Kento's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
OKAY... but how is that NOT the case with the liscense plate???? The plate doesn't cover the the "Grin"... it just looks like it's grinning with a little Hitler moustache...


Quick Reply: Poll ~ 93-95 or 99 spec front end?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.