3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Polished intake manifolds are VERY BAD!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-06, 11:23 PM
  #51  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Improved FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kento
I'm probably a little off technically on this (any aerodynamicists out there can correct me), but I'm pretty sure the basic premise is correct.
ha....yeah, plenty of those in here
Old 07-01-06, 03:38 PM
  #52  
2/4 wheel cornering fiend

 
Kento's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by primerGrey
I am guessing it is these low pressure zones that condense out the gasoline (like the contrails behind a jet airplane formed by condensed water), so keeping them smaller would be good, hence the rough surfaces helping on the curves. But that's just an educated guess.
Actually, it's not the low pressure that causes the condensation (the fuel is still basically a liquid in the form of suspended droplets, not vapor), it's the loss of airflow speed that allows the droplets to contact the intake wall and pool together. Low pressure is a constant in NA engines' intake tracts.
Old 12-09-06, 09:28 PM
  #53  
17 second FD

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
MADDSLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poughkeepsie, New York
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I can see how all of this can be relevant to a NA engine, but in the case of a turbo charged vehicle, where the air is pressurized and the engine is being force-fed air rather than just sucking it in, would the results be any different?
Old 12-10-06, 06:50 AM
  #54  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by MADDSLOW
I can see how all of this can be relevant to a NA engine, but in the case of a turbo charged vehicle, where the air is pressurized and the engine is being force-fed air rather than just sucking it in, would the results be any different?
No. The flow characteristics will change (higher velocity, higher reynolds number, higher temps/viscosity, etc) but the same theories and principles will apply.

Remember, outside air has pressure. When the engine develops vacuum to draw in air, it moves because of the difference in pressure. If you apply boost to the intake, you can think of it as an artificial way to make a very, very high ambient air pressure. It flows because of the difference in pressure, only the difference is much greater.

Dave
Old 12-10-06, 09:06 AM
  #55  
Please somebody help!!!

iTrader: (1)
 
NissanConvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodridge, IL
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there's another proponent of combustion chamber turbulence. a man by the name of somender singh. http://somender-singh.com primarily for otto cycle engines i don't know if we could even use these ideas. something to look at though.
Old 12-10-06, 10:20 AM
  #56  
Boost Addict

iTrader: (3)
 
nashman69g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Metairie, LA near new orleans
Posts: 1,898
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Wow...So I can actually understand this...School must be paying off...lol...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
01-30-19 06:31 AM
Engine stand ready
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
08-14-15 10:26 PM



Quick Reply: Polished intake manifolds are VERY BAD!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.