No BOV Discussion
I remember that thread. I pointed out that the guys turbo was surging. I think if you search my post a few month back you may find it.
but in my opinion BOV is a must.
but in my opinion BOV is a must.
I remember reading some time ago that the best location for a BOV is as close to the intake as possible. I too have the greddy elbow with the BOV on it. I want to upgrade to newer tial style BOV because it's design and function is much superior the older BOVs.
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
From: Brandon, MS
Trending Topics
Let's say you are going down the track @ 30psi and for what ever reason you need to let off wouldn't you want the extra protection of air pressure release?

The Ford 3.5L Ecoboost engine has the blowoff valves before the intercooler.

Many engines do have the factory blowoff valve after the intercooler. Mitsubishi does that on the 3000GT 6G72 and Evo 4G63 engine, shown here:

The Nissan Skyline GT-R RB26DETT and Sylvia SR20DET engines are also like that. On all Subaru engines from the past 10 years the blowoff valve is physically located on the intercooler itself.

So as you can see, blowoff valve location varies greatly depending on whatever goals (noise reduction etc) and constraints (fitment, plumbing, cost) the engineers had.
^^^ that's key. Assuming engineers plumb the BOV where they can due to space. Thinking about it on a mechanical stand point it makes much sense to relief pressure closer to the intake.
No risk of failure. It is common practice for modern race cars that are turbocharged to run no bov. This is because when a bov fails it releases all of your boost, aka power. Obviously there is the subjective concern about accelerated turbo wear by running no bov, but this does not apply to every application where cost is less of a factor.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
renjiv2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
57
Jan 25, 2024 03:34 AM
Devon300zx
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Sep 17, 2015 03:50 PM



Anyone care to help?





