3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

A Newbie looking for answers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:32 PM
  #1  
FeaRJN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: MA
A Newbie looking for answers

Okie, ive just joined the forum, but i have been searching for a few weeks now. So i decided to make this post to get this off my chest. Im wondering about modding a good amount of power into the FD. But let me explain. Ok, First of all, i dont have an FD, but i LOVE there look, and there quick and agile handling is awesome. But, i love the quartermile, and i would love to keep it street too.
So, im wondering. To keep this car on Emissions, ( I might be able to get a buddy to pass it for me) but anyways, Can we get a good amount of power out of this car, on a stock engine, and would it cost alot, to get about 500RWHP out? I understand 500RWHP is no stock engine. Thats overtime, but im really baising whether ill buy an FD in the future off this or not. So let me break this Down.
1. How Reliable is the stock engine?
2. Will i sarcrifice my body in expenses to get say, 400 to 450 at the wheel?
3. Will this car remain reliable?
Ok, now, im not looking for Daily driver, drive to to work, and back, go everywhere with it. But i wouldnt mind taking it out each night to have fun with it too. Gas mileage doesnt bother me, ill pay anything
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:37 PM
  #2  
katit's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by FeaRJN
Okie, ive just joined the forum, but i have been searching for a few weeks now.
Did you search FAQ section? THOSE questions answered nicely overthere...
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:51 PM
  #3  
FeaRJN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: MA
Which FAQ you talking about? You mean the Single turbo one? Ive been looking over there all night.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:53 PM
  #4  
dontlift's Avatar
Blithering Idiot
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 354
Likes: 5
From: NE Pa
The one right here!
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/faq-3rd-gen-other-useful-links-68640/
FAQ for 3rd Gen & other useful links

See the end of post #3
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:54 PM
  #5  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Lemme just add that the FD is NOT a good car to set up for drag racing; that's what Mustangs are for. You'll break every driveline component (and spend $20K+ in the process) if you're hardcore and going for some crazy timeslips (10s).

Also, regardless of how you modify the car, as your modification list increases, the car's reliability decreases...quickly. As such, most ppl on the forum have gotten the greatest reliability mod money can buy: another car as a daily driver lol.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:08 PM
  #6  
FeaRJN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: MA
I have another car. And im not a huge fan im stangs, now, im not looking for anything lower then a 10 seconder, and im talking 10's after a few years, but i wouldnt mind high 11's and 12's earlier on, and im checking the FAQ's right now. I understand my reliability will decrease. Im looking at the FAQ's right now, helps alot. Ive noticed one of the sites, rx7.org/robinette states a pretty easy way to get 360 At the flywheel, and im guessing it's reliable. Now, i think this all comes back to my larger question. How reliable is this engine and, how reliable would a street port be?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #7  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
You keep using the word "reliable". Reliable is something you find in a Honda commercial. If you want something reliable, move on to another car. IMO, there are plenty of other cars which are easier and cheaper to turn into drag cars.

If you want something reliable and sporty, look at a C5 Corvette. Sorry, that's just the cold hard truth. This is just the type of car you have to want, despite all the problems it can and most likely will bring.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #8  
FeaRJN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: MA
Well, your right, and im reading more on the FAQ's part too. IT seems this car needs a more heavily modification. But like i said MahJik, i do have a second car, So the reliability isnt the biggest problem. But i think i might move on. I dunno, it doesnt sound to bad.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:18 PM
  #9  
aaron1017's Avatar
Magic Triangles no more!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
I wouldn't build an FD for a drag car, I would choose something else for that purpose. With all the time you spend beefing up the FD's drivetrain, you could have just started out with something stronger.

Supra's make great drag cars because their drivetrain is REALLY strong stock.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:19 PM
  #10  
katit's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by Mahjik
You keep using the word "reliable".
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:27 PM
  #11  
FeaRJN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: MA
Im actually looking into a supra aaron1017. My biggest debate was, Supra or rx7. I like the rx7 better personally, but it just seems the supra is more me.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #12  
aaron1017's Avatar
Magic Triangles no more!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by FeaRJN
Im actually looking into a supra aaron1017. My biggest debate was, Supra or rx7. I like the rx7 better personally, but it just seems the supra is more me.
Excellent choice. Despite being 3500lbs, the Supra carries its weigh very well and is still fun in the turns. My good friend has a 95TT 6-speed targa and have driven it many times, he has also driven my FD many times. They are quite different cars. We both prefer road racing/turns and aren't into drag racing much. His car will definitely kill mine in a drag racing with 380rwhp and rwtq on the stock twins with BPU mods. I feel the FD is easier to control at its limit than the Supra though.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:38 PM
  #13  
FeaRJN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: MA
Yeah, im an exterior get in mind. Which is why the rx7 wins me over. But im a Quartermiler too, so i think thats why i take a supra over something like a stang, or trans am. Also they are just built to take power it seems.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:43 PM
  #14  
aaron1017's Avatar
Magic Triangles no more!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by FeaRJN
Yeah, im an exterior get in mind. Which is why the rx7 wins me over. But im a Quartermiler too, so i think thats why i take a supra over something like a stang, or trans am. Also they are just built to take power it seems.
Both cars look great to me and I prefer the RX-7 in the looks department.


Supras are generally quite reliable and have few problems while making 600+hp on stock components. Head on over to http://www.supraforums.com/forum/index.php if ya haven't already.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #15  
FeaRJN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: MA
Ive been at MKIVforums.com already, or .org whatever it is. :-D
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Captain Hook
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
Oct 4, 2015 06:35 PM
Zinraf
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Oct 1, 2015 01:09 PM
Smokeyfb33
Old School and Other Rotary
10
Oct 1, 2015 12:10 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Sep 28, 2015 09:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 AM.