My Dyno Sheet NON-SEQ 10psi & 13psi
Passenger
Posts: n/a
Hello everyone,
I would like to share my dyno sheet with everyone just so they could see a NON-SEQ sheet
. I have not seen many so I thought I would share. The first run was 319HP@10psi and the 2nd run was 337@13psi. All this done on 93 octane and about 92* air temp and it was done at PFS of course. It was tuned by Ray and Peter Thanx again guys!! My setup can be seen @ www.dontbearikki.com . So here ya go and let me get your ideas of what you think about the graph!!!!
-Rikki
I would like to share my dyno sheet with everyone just so they could see a NON-SEQ sheet
. I have not seen many so I thought I would share. The first run was 319HP@10psi and the 2nd run was 337@13psi. All this done on 93 octane and about 92* air temp and it was done at PFS of course. It was tuned by Ray and Peter Thanx again guys!! My setup can be seen @ www.dontbearikki.com . So here ya go and let me get your ideas of what you think about the graph!!!!-Rikki

Trending Topics
Originally posted by Dont_Be_A_Rikki
THAT WAS ON THE OLD MOTOR
THAT WAS ON THE OLD MOTOR
What was your A/F ratio????
You have must have been on the lean side.
No wonder you blew your engine.
Originally posted by the_glass_man
319 HP @ 10 PSI on stock ports????
What was your A/F ratio????
You have must have been on the lean side.
No wonder you blew your engine.
319 HP @ 10 PSI on stock ports????
What was your A/F ratio????
You have must have been on the lean side.
No wonder you blew your engine.
Nice dyno Rikki!!!!
BadDog's dyno with pretty much the same mods and boost as you. You guys both made 337!!!! Its pretty cool to see the same mods make the same. The only difference is he is seq and stock ports. Here is a link to his thread and sheet.....
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=96259
To be honest I dont see much advantage with non seq. If you compare rpm for rpm he is about 10-20rwhp below you from 4300-about 4600 (only 300 rpms) and that is it. BUT at 3K he has about 70rwhp more than you. The rest of the graph is vertually the same with in a few hp.
Anyway, I just thought they were both very good dyno sheet to compare 2 cars making the same power one in seq and one in non seq so we could see how much difference there is between the 2. It would be interesting to see the difference between.
With the 337 you should see some 11's!!!!! Go buy some good drag radials!!!!!!
STEPHEN
BadDog's dyno with pretty much the same mods and boost as you. You guys both made 337!!!! Its pretty cool to see the same mods make the same. The only difference is he is seq and stock ports. Here is a link to his thread and sheet.....
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=96259
To be honest I dont see much advantage with non seq. If you compare rpm for rpm he is about 10-20rwhp below you from 4300-about 4600 (only 300 rpms) and that is it. BUT at 3K he has about 70rwhp more than you. The rest of the graph is vertually the same with in a few hp.
Anyway, I just thought they were both very good dyno sheet to compare 2 cars making the same power one in seq and one in non seq so we could see how much difference there is between the 2. It would be interesting to see the difference between.
With the 337 you should see some 11's!!!!! Go buy some good drag radials!!!!!!
STEPHEN
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
The 10# graph looks very strong, too strong actually. The 13# graph looks about right, although kinda high if you were running on a stock original motor. Also, I would have expected more of a jump between 13psi and 10 psi.
Still, good runs--I'm sure you have a fast car
Still, good runs--I'm sure you have a fast car
Re: My Dyno Sheet NON-SEQ 10psi & 13psi
what mods do u have?
Originally posted by Dont_Be_A_Rikki
Hello everyone,
I would like to share my dyno sheet with everyone just so they could see a NON-SEQ sheet
. I have not seen many so I thought I would share. The first run was 319HP@10psi and the 2nd run was 337@13psi. All this done on 93 octane and about 92* air temp and it was done at PFS of course. It was tuned by Ray and Peter Thanx again guys!! My setup can be seen @ www.dontbearikki.com . So here ya go and let me get your ideas of what you think about the graph!!!!
-Rikki
Hello everyone,
I would like to share my dyno sheet with everyone just so they could see a NON-SEQ sheet
. I have not seen many so I thought I would share. The first run was 319HP@10psi and the 2nd run was 337@13psi. All this done on 93 octane and about 92* air temp and it was done at PFS of course. It was tuned by Ray and Peter Thanx again guys!! My setup can be seen @ www.dontbearikki.com . So here ya go and let me get your ideas of what you think about the graph!!!!-Rikki

Originally posted by BillyBob
PULLIN' THA FLAG!!!!!!!!

NICE WORK IN PHOTOSHOP! ZOOM IN ON THE LEFT EDGE AND CHECK IT OUT! WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT!
PULLIN' THA FLAG!!!!!!!!

NICE WORK IN PHOTOSHOP! ZOOM IN ON THE LEFT EDGE AND CHECK IT OUT! WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT!
What does the telephone mean??? Am I missing something?
The 10psi run seems a little strong but the 13psi run seems ok to me for the mods he has.
STEPHEN
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Ryan,
I have an older dyno sheet of my old setup when I was non-sequential, with the Power Fc, 1200cc secondaries, KDR ported motor. I dynoed only a few more hp. than you. This is why I still think you were tuned too lean.
I have an older dyno sheet of my old setup when I was non-sequential, with the Power Fc, 1200cc secondaries, KDR ported motor. I dynoed only a few more hp. than you. This is why I still think you were tuned too lean.
Last edited by ErnieT; Jul 17, 2002 at 09:10 PM.
Originally posted by SPOautos
What does the telephone mean??? Am I missing something?
The 10psi run seems a little strong but the 13psi run seems ok to me for the mods he has.
STEPHEN
What does the telephone mean??? Am I missing something?
The 10psi run seems a little strong but the 13psi run seems ok to me for the mods he has.
STEPHEN





