3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

My car has no PCV valve?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 06:52 PM
  #1  
moehler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 32
From: South Jersey
Unhappy My car has no PCV valve?!?

My mechanic and I (JPR Iports in south jersey. I would recomend Jim to anybody) have been investigating the many oil leaks my car seams to have for two weeks now (three times). The oil seams to be leaking out of every seal that it can (4 or 5 very noticable places -- metering pump seal, turbo seals, IC couplers, all over the engine block, etc...). He steamed cleaned the engine and after a few days it's just as bad as ever, but we couldn't find specifically what was leaking.

So tonight we notice that the car has no PCV valve and that the nipple coming off of the oil fill stem is just capped off! This seams to be very bad to me b/c it has been like this since before I got the car which was 10k miles ago. So I've been driving it (hard) like this for a year straight as daily driver.

Could this cause any long term damage to my motor and tubos and maybe anything else? Thanks.

-Matt
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 06:57 PM
  #2  
Zyon13B's Avatar
"I see triangles"
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: PA
95's do not have a PCV valve.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 07:00 PM
  #3  
moehler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 32
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by Zyon13B
95's do not have a PCV valve.
I thought 95's don't have an EGR valve, but that they have a PCV valve..
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 07:03 PM
  #4  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
95s don't have an EGR but certainly have a PCV. However, the PCV is not plugged back into the intake tract like it is with 93-94s. Therefore, we 95s don't have quite the track leakage that 93-94s do....
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 07:05 PM
  #5  
moehler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 32
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by rynberg
95s don't have an EGR but certainly have a PCV. However, the PCV is not plugged back into the intake tract like it is with 93-94s. Therefore, we 95s don't have quite the track leakage that 93-94s do....
rynberg, could you please explain this more for a PCV noobe like myself .
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 07:14 PM
  #6  
Zyon13B's Avatar
"I see triangles"
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally posted by Zyon13B
95's do not have a PCV valve.
I guess I need to add "vented to filler neck"

NEways you could try a catch of some sort in the line returning to the intake, it should eliminate some excess oil.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 09:50 AM
  #7  
moehler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 32
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by Zyon13B
I guess I need to add "vented to filler neck"

NEways you could try a catch of some sort in the line returning to the intake, it should eliminate some excess oil.
so where is the PCV valve in a 95?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 10:10 AM
  #8  
bureau_c's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
My car (a '93, but I assume this changed when Pettit rebuilt my motor a few years ago) doesn't have anything attached to the filler neck either. I've been told its normal, and I certainly don't have oil leaking all over the place.

jds
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 12:31 PM
  #9  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Early FDs have two ways to vent exhaust/other fumes
from the pan(crankcase) into the engine for burning.
A traditional PCV valve between the oil filler neck and UIM, and a hose going from the oil filler neck to the #1 turbo inlet.

The PCV valve is a possible source of failure. If stuck open, under boost you will pressurize the crankcase.
This has happened . Since the other hose does the same thing, many of us have removed and blocked off the PCV circuit. Same thing is done by many road racers as they must have an oil catch can.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 12:55 PM
  #10  
rockshox's Avatar
-
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
currently im running the hose to the turbo intake elbow and have the pcv blocked off. but i think i am about to reverse this. my reasoning is if im going to be sucking up oil i would rather have it go through as little of the intake as possible. the pcv goes straight to the manifold instead of going through the turbo and intercooler first. what do people think about that?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 02:00 PM
  #11  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by rockshox
currently im running the hose to the turbo intake elbow and have the pcv blocked off. but i think i am about to reverse this. my reasoning is if im going to be sucking up oil i would rather have it go through as little of the intake as possible. the pcv goes straight to the manifold instead of going through the turbo and intercooler first. what do people think about that?
Under boost you will have no way of venting crankcae pressure since the pcv is closed under boost. The only place there is vacuum 100% of the time is at the turbo intake.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 02:02 PM
  #12  
rockshox's Avatar
-
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
right but now long are you under boost continously? i cant see that this matters.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 02:36 PM
  #13  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by rockshox
right but now long are you under boost continously?
The car is on boost nearly 100% of the time if you do any amount of road racing at all.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 03:45 PM
  #14  
rockshox's Avatar
-
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
i do a fair amount of road racing and usually i brake before every corner.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 06:53 PM
  #15  
rockshox's Avatar
-
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
any more opinions? i obviously know the pcv isnt active under boost but there is still enough time to relieve pressure.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 09:17 PM
  #16  
reza's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
well if you are pressurizing the crankcase, any seal that is about to go will go...

The best is to vent it into the air thru oil catch can.

I am thinking of eliminating the charcoal canister vent too..
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 08:08 AM
  #17  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by rockshox
i do a fair amount of road racing and usually i brake before every corner.
Good point Every corner? See how many consecutive seconds you stay on boost next time you're out; I bet you'd be suprised. Also keep in mind the engine is at high RPM, so that time spent on boost with no crankcase venting is not the way to go IMO. Once you make any seal or gasket begin to leak, it's just going to keep leaking.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 12:08 PM
  #18  
moehler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 32
From: South Jersey
I'm still confused... how or where does a 95 relieve crankcase pressure?
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 01:35 PM
  #19  
R. Gambino's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 68
Likes: 1
From: New York, N.Y.
search robinette site under pcv valve. your answer is there with a diagram
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 02:10 PM
  #20  
jfxp's Avatar
Rotor Nut
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: philly pa
moehler, my car is at JPR w/ jim as well (broken clutch fork) does ur car have a 99 spec front end unpainted? alittle off topic, sorry
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 03:30 PM
  #21  
moehler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 32
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by jfxp
moehler, my car is at JPR w/ jim as well (broken clutch fork) does ur car have a 99 spec front end unpainted? alittle off topic, sorry
nope... it's white and has a stock exterior. I have it at home now.


Originally posted by R. Gambino
search robinette site under pcv valve. your answer is there with a diagram
Thank You!! The diagram and expalination is here:

http://www.rx7turboturbo.com/robrobinette/pcv.htm

From this, it seams that the 95's should have a tube coming off of the filler neck and going to the turbo inlet path. Am I reading this correct?
My car just has the nipple on the filler neck capped off?!? So I should still look at this as source of concern, right??

Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 05:16 PM
  #22  
KevinK2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 6
From: Delaware
bad idea

Originally posted by rockshox
currently im running the hose to the turbo intake elbow and have the pcv blocked off. but i think i am about to reverse this. my reasoning is if im going to be sucking up oil i would rather have it go through as little of the intake as possible. the pcv goes straight to the manifold instead of going through the turbo and intercooler first. what do people think about that?
the pcv valve is designed to only permit a small amount of flow to uim at idle, high vac. a large line would likely result in uncontrolled idle.

ok to lose the pcv, but the vent tube from filler neck to tubo inlet should always be used. for track use, i use an ast-like closed catch can, and drain it ocassionally.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 05:48 PM
  #23  
SanJoRX7's Avatar
uid 0
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 858
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco, CA
Anyone got a pic of this valve? I think mine may be leaking too, just want to positively confirm the identity of this part
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 05:53 PM
  #24  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO


Originally posted by SanJoRX7
Anyone got a pic of this valve? I think mine may be leaking too, just want to positively confirm the identity of this part
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
Monsterbox
Single Turbo RX-7's
22
Jul 29, 2022 10:48 PM
BNR34RB26DETT
Build Threads
42
Feb 28, 2018 11:27 AM
WyomingTII
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Aug 13, 2015 10:42 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.