3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Motor Mounts -- Why the price range?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-11, 12:53 PM
  #1  
93 Touring

Thread Starter
 
ppritchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Longwood FL
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
FL Motor Mounts -- Why the price range?

Looking at new motor mounts and trying to figure out "why" the price range is so so wide. OEMs at $500 range yet after markets from less than $200.

Do the after markets require the OEM mounts?
Do the OEMs come with New mounts (arms)?

I know OEM is almost always more, but this seems like a huge gap.

Thanks for any insight,

ppritchard
Old 12-21-11, 01:55 PM
  #2  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,011
Received 862 Likes on 611 Posts
Originally Posted by ppritchard
Looking at new motor mounts and trying to figure out "why" the price range is so so wide. OEMs at $500 range yet after markets from less than $200.
Because at least for most things OEM, MAZDA can get their price. And as is the case with most any other aftermarket parts I can think of, the lower price of the small volumn of aftermarket manufactures doesn't pressure MAZDA's price downward. I'm guessing aftermarket suppliers production volumn is based more closely on demand. Seems like that would be harder to do for MAZDA. They also kept them on the shelf for (at least) the past 10 years.
Originally Posted by ppritchard
Do the after markets require the OEM mounts?
Yes, they will require the 'arm'. While not absolutely required, IMO the steel arm is preferred for both sides.
Originally Posted by ppritchard
Do the OEMs come with New mounts (arms)?
No.
Old 12-21-11, 07:11 PM
  #3  
Built Not Bought

iTrader: (14)
 
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 840 Likes on 529 Posts
OEM is extremely expensive for what they are, but they should cost more than aftermarket ones. Most aftermarket mounts are just pucks of poly cut to the right size. OEM are basically filled with hydraulic fluid to help with the cushioning.
Old 12-22-11, 01:33 AM
  #4  
SideWayZ The Only Way

iTrader: (11)
 
FD3S2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davie, Florida
Posts: 4,850
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgtblue

Yes, they will require the 'arm'. While not absolutely required, IMO the steel arm is preferred for both sides.

No.
where do you get steel arms for both sides?
Old 12-22-11, 01:59 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Sephek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cali.
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
3rd gen Classifieds or ebay, I bought a pair a few weeks ago here for 60 shipped with some aftermarket mounts.
Old 12-22-11, 05:29 AM
  #6  
Rotary Specialists
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (11)
 
Banzai-Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,824
Received 307 Likes on 179 Posts
The high price of the OEM mounts DOES include new steel brackets

OEM motor mount

Old 12-22-11, 06:11 AM
  #7  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (52)
 
XLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Reminds me of of the suspension busings.... It was cheaper to go with a complete Powerflex kit, then buy new OEM.

I installed the stiffer IR Performance engine mounts (they have two different stiffness's available) and couldn't be happier. My car is primarily a street car.

www.irperformance.com

Right on their home page, and their on SALE!
Old 12-22-11, 11:12 AM
  #8  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
because aftermarket mounts cost no more than $100 to make? and they use the stock mount arms.
Old 12-22-11, 01:01 PM
  #9  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,011
Received 862 Likes on 611 Posts
Originally Posted by Banzai-Racing
The high price of the OEM mounts DOES include new steel brackets.....
Been a few years, but thought I remembered reading or being told at MAZDAMOTORSPORTS that the price didn't include arms and recommending a second steel arm to replace the aluminum versions. Figured that was how all the OEM mounts came and you had to order the arm separately. Thanks for the correction.
Old 12-22-11, 08:05 PM
  #10  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
nope, all factory mounts come with the arm. i don't think they make the aluminum version anymore anyways.
Old 12-22-11, 08:23 PM
  #11  
half ass 2 or whole ass 1

iTrader: (114)
 
cr-rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: okinawa to tampa
Posts: 3,425
Received 480 Likes on 350 Posts
Originally Posted by XLR8
Reminds me of of the suspension busings.... It was cheaper to go with a complete Powerflex kit, then buy new OEM.

I installed the stiffer IR Performance engine mounts (they have two different stiffness's available) and couldn't be happier. My car is primarily a street car.

www.irperformance.com

Right on their home page, and their on SALE!
so those mounts dont require that metal bracket? also, they look like they would sit the motor in a different position. those poly mounts are taller...

do these mount fine with the factory arm? how hard is it to swap the mounts?
Old 12-22-11, 08:27 PM
  #12  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (5)
 
Tem120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Why replace the aluminum with steel? aren't the aluminum lighter? are they more brittle? did they come with some sort of defect?
Old 12-22-11, 09:18 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
sc_frontier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sherman, Tx
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The rubber is formed around the aluminum brackets. The rubber is bolted to the steel brackets. It is my opinion that Mazda motor mounts are in a league of their own.
Old 12-23-11, 12:13 AM
  #14  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by Tem120
Why replace the aluminum with steel? aren't the aluminum lighter? are they more brittle? did they come with some sort of defect?
i'm sure there was likely eventually some failures with the aluminum castings.
Old 12-23-11, 07:28 AM
  #15  
Rotary Specialists
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (11)
 
Banzai-Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,824
Received 307 Likes on 179 Posts
The steel mounts allow the rubber portion to be replaceable, since it is bolted to the bracket. The aluminium bracket has the rubber bonded to the arm, this nearly always tears off causing a failure. The aluminium brackets needs to be modified to accept replacement poly mounts. http://banzai-racing.com/store/FD_po...or_mounts.html


Last edited by Banzai-Racing; 12-23-11 at 07:31 AM.
Old 12-23-11, 08:07 AM
  #16  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (9)
 
$lacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,087
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Is it accepted that Noltec mounts are the best?
Old 12-23-11, 04:46 PM
  #17  
SideWayZ The Only Way

iTrader: (11)
 
FD3S2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davie, Florida
Posts: 4,850
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
so our cars come with 1 steel and 1 aluminium arm? why not make them both steel or both aluminium?
Old 12-24-11, 03:23 AM
  #18  
Rotary Specialists
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (11)
 
Banzai-Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,824
Received 307 Likes on 179 Posts
Most people do go to two steel brackets for the ease of installing aftermarket mounts or when they find that their left side mount has torn apart and they call Mazda for a new one. It is not practical to use two aluminium brackets as the right side steel mount has a heat shield to protect the rubber or poly from the heat of the manifold and turbos.
Old 12-24-11, 09:00 AM
  #19  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by $lacker
Is it accepted that Noltec mounts are the best?
It is accepted (by most) that the stock mounts are the best.
Old 12-24-11, 09:48 AM
  #20  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 416 Likes on 252 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
It is accepted (by most) that the stock mounts are the best.
Correct answer
Old 12-24-11, 03:14 PM
  #21  
SideWayZ The Only Way

iTrader: (11)
 
FD3S2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davie, Florida
Posts: 4,850
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Around how much do the steel bracket go for?
Old 12-24-11, 05:59 PM
  #22  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,525
Received 538 Likes on 325 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by adam c
It is accepted (by most) that the stock mounts are the best.
Without defining 'best' we can't really make an informed statement. This isn't directed at adam by any means, but when I see threads where someone (usually a newb) asks "Which blah-blah is best?" I just shake my head. Reminds me of an 8 year old in the aisle at Toys R Us. "Which turbo kits is best?" Um, yeah.

Personally, I think the OEM mounts suck. Overpriced and failure-prone. Plus, I can tell when an engine has OEM mounts.....grab the UIM and pull. The motor moves around like a jellyfish, and this is when the mounts are in good shape. Lastly, they make R&R'ing the engine in the bay more of a PITA.

For certain customer types (or like my old man ) they DO make sense and we do recommend them. For about 95% of typical FD owners that I deal with, you can take the OEM pucks and toss them. We have a shelf full of them if anyone is interested

Comes down to personal preference, but I love the Poly mounts. Done right, they're stiffer yet transfer minimal vibration. Lead to a drivetrain that doesn't flop around, crisper shifting, and quiet frankly no need for an engine torque brace.

All of this is just IMO of course
Old 12-24-11, 07:31 PM
  #23  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Without defining 'best' we can't really make an informed statement. This isn't directed at adam by any means, but when I see threads where someone (usually a newb) asks "Which blah-blah is best?" I just shake my head. Reminds me of an 8 year old in the aisle at Toys R Us. "Which turbo kits is best?" Um, yeah.

Personally, I think the OEM mounts suck. Overpriced and failure-prone. Plus, I can tell when an engine has OEM mounts.....grab the UIM and pull. The motor moves around like a jellyfish, and this is when the mounts are in good shape. Lastly, they make R&R'ing the engine in the bay more of a PITA.

For certain customer types (or like my old man ) they DO make sense and we do recommend them. For about 95% of typical FD owners that I deal with, you can take the OEM pucks and toss them. We have a shelf full of them if anyone is interested

Comes down to personal preference, but I love the Poly mounts. Done right, they're stiffer yet transfer minimal vibration. Lead to a drivetrain that doesn't flop around, crisper shifting, and quiet frankly no need for an engine torque brace.
You couldn't pay me to put poly mounts in my car. Some people are able to cope with the vibrations. They gradually become numb over time, and don't notice it any more. Most of them are young ........... and don't know any better. The only real use for them (IMO) is in a dedicated track car.


Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
All of this is just IMO of course
That's why we're here
Old 12-24-11, 08:10 PM
  #24  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Oscypek1007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Des Plaines
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I honestly felt no difference when I put poly mounts in my car, the shifting just got a lot better. The rotary is a smooth engine to begin with. Now when I did poly mounts in my s2000 there was a huge difference, the whole car felt like it was shaking and the shifter bounced back and forth in neutral. I feel like for the fd you might as well do poly mounts, doesn't change ride quality just makes shifting a lot nicer.
Old 12-24-11, 08:38 PM
  #25  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
A friend of mine put them in his FD. His car was miserable to ride in. He took them off, and went back to the oem mounts. A huge difference in vibration.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 AM.