3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

midpipe vs. high flow cat performance comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-02, 11:51 PM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
Brentis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question midpipe vs. high flow cat performance comparison

Can someone on this board give me your interpretation of these graphs. One shows the delta of the horspower between a hf cat and a midpipe and the other shows the delta between the torque curves.

I guess what I am interested in is which is faster in a 1/4 mile or track situation, how much, and why. I would suppose gearing would come into play somewhat, but I am not that familiar yet to have a good understanding.

Likewise, I read somewhere that someone had the same 1/4 mile time with a trap speed 1 mph slower with the hf cat. In my world they are effectively the same and the hf cat isn't as loud and will pass inspection.

http://www.efini.net/tqcomparo.htm

http://www.efini.net/hpcomparo.htm

Thanks!
Old 12-11-02, 11:47 AM
  #2  
gross polluter

iTrader: (2)
 
Tom93R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,759
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Those mid-pipe runs look strange, why does he suddenly get a huge surge of power at 6k rpm? Looks like a repeat of the turbo transition. Looking at that graph though, I think a high-flow is definately the way to go unless you really do alot of drag racing. The mid-pipe will win in the 1/4 because you can keep the revs up in its power band the whole time. The high-flow may win on the track where you are verying your engine speed alot more, that would probably be a close call.
Old 12-11-02, 02:39 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
KevinK2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,209
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
insider info:

there is no comparo, Wael had a misfire from transition to 6K with the mid-pipe run.

below transition midpipe run matched the +cat run. above transition the midpipe will kick butt.
Old 12-11-02, 03:15 PM
  #4  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I posted some dyno graph comparisons with identical boost settings with a highflow cat and then a mid pipe. The difference was 266 rwhp with the HFC and 298 rwhp with the midpipe. After the car was tuned I got 317 from it.

I drove with my HFC for 7 months and enjoyed it, but the mid pipe is more fun to me. I get no boost creep at all. I still spike, but I did with my hfc too.

MP=More Power. hehe.
Old 12-11-02, 04:45 PM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
Brentis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
wow 32 horsepower is awesome. One thing that I have been pondering is how important is peak horsepower over mean horspower improvement. (Viper vs. S2000 type analysis) I much rather have 300 hp average over the rpm band rather than 220 hp with a 400hp spike (=equating to an avg. of say 260) wouldn't I?????
Old 12-11-02, 05:20 PM
  #6  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at my power curve before and after my MP (you need to search..oooppps no searchy button). Anyway I like it much better now. I don't notice any difference in low end power, but top end goes nuts. My dyno showed an 80 HP gain from 52 MPH to 60 MPH in 3rd gear. Thats a rush.
Old 12-12-02, 12:18 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

 
racerfoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southwest Missouri
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
what about a mp over gutted cat? big boost in performance?
Old 12-12-02, 12:33 AM
  #8  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
RX7Elmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
do you mean a gutted stock cat? The stock cat's piping is smaller than a real midpipe. ALso the turbulance from the huge canister (open cat) would cause some drawbacks. I would go with a true midpiipe.

Danny
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
5
08-09-18 05:54 PM
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-08-15 05:36 PM
AXA
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
09-05-15 10:06 AM



Quick Reply: midpipe vs. high flow cat performance comparison



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.