3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

M2 Large Core - number of cross tubes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 01:37 PM
  #1  
moconnor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 96
From: Bay Area, CA
M2 Large Core - number of cross tubes

According the old SCC article, the newest design of the M2/ASP large intercooler has 22 cross tubes, vs. 18 for the earlier design.

http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/pr...a_rx_7_part_9/

However, I'm looking at a local M2 large but the number of tubes it has is 15:



It definitely looks like the large in every other way. Perhaps this is a very early model?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #2  
VegasFD's Avatar
Wishin I Still Had The FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas, NV
FWIW, I just looked at a picture of my M2 Medium, and it has 22 tubes. I think the only difference between the two is the width. 15 seems significantlt smaller.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 03:11 PM
  #3  
moconnor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 96
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by VegasFD
FWIW, I just looked at a picture of my M2 Medium, and it has 22 tubes. I think the only difference between the two is the width.
Yup - only the width should be different. This IC has been sitting in someone's garage since the late 1990s so may be an early prototype.

Probably not worth the risk - pity since it is effectively new and all the ducting and clamps have never been used.

Martin
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 06:38 PM
  #4  
poss's Avatar
Slower Traffic Keep Right
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Dayton, OH
They aren't the same core. (medium vs large) At one time kevin posted that the medium was a more efficient core than the large.


https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...91&postcount=8
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #5  
VegasFD's Avatar
Wishin I Still Had The FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas, NV
By more efficient, do you mean the ratio between cooling capabilties to pressure drop?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 06:45 PM
  #6  
moconnor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 96
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by poss
They aren't the same core. (medium vs large) At one time kevin posted that the medium was a more efficient core than the large.
More efficient per volume, he said.

And if you look at the SCC article I linked to, it clearly says that the early M2 large design had 18 cross tubes and the later has 22. The intercooler pictured has 15, which is why I am confused.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #7  
poss's Avatar
Slower Traffic Keep Right
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Dayton, OH
Originally Posted by moconnor
More efficient per volume, he said.
I figured that was a given. Why would he offer a larger intercooler with reduced cooling capacity? I was being presumptuous.

And if you look at the SCC article I linked to, it clearly says that the early M2 large design had 18 cross tubes and the later has 22. The intercooler pictured has 15, which is why I am confused.
Your answer is right is in your comment. I don't put much faith in SCC, especially when it comes to RX-7s...who knows though. It could have been a typo, or they could have counted wrong, or kevin could have made some mid run changes. One thing's for certain, if you can verify that it is an M2/ASP IC and it's priced right, you can't go wrong.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 07:05 PM
  #8  
moconnor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 96
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by poss
Your answer is right is in your comment. I don't put much faith in SCC, especially when it comes to RX-7s...who knows though.
Sorry if I may have sounded sarcastic. I put very little faith in SCC (though, that said, their RX-7 build-up is not bad, and stands up reasonably well after 5 years). I did some searching through old classifieds and the pictures I found have M2 large ICs with 18 rows or 22 rows. The seller has sent me other pictures and it definitely looks like the M2 unit, down to the duct extension that seems pretty rare now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM.