3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Long-Term Tire Wear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-18, 11:14 AM
  #1  
Recovering Miataholic

Thread Starter
 
wstrohm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 1,531
Received 38 Likes on 26 Posts
Long-Term Tire Wear

Our '94 FD seems to wear the rear tires slightly more quickly than the front. There are currently about 30K miles on the Bridgestone LS-V set, not frequently rotated, and the rear tires are noticeably more worn than the fronts. I just rotated them, but is that common? There seems to be no unequal wear like due to bad alignment. Is acceleration/deceleration harder on the rears than steering/deceleration is on the fronts? (Car is mostly stock.)
Old 07-22-18, 02:46 PM
  #2  
Racecar - Formula 2000

 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, OH
Posts: 3,848
Received 277 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by wstrohm
Our '94 FD seems to wear the rear tires slightly more quickly than the front. There are currently about 30K miles on the Bridgestone LS-V set, not frequently rotated, and the rear tires are noticeably more worn than the fronts. I just rotated them, but is that common? There seems to be no unequal wear like due to bad alignment. Is acceleration/deceleration harder on the rears than steering/deceleration is on the fronts? (Car is mostly stock.)
The Torsen diff (limited slip) puts more slippage into the rear tires on any relatively sharp turn while accelerating. I've always found that my rears wear faster than the fronts due to that. And the front and rear wear patterns are different. The fronts wear more on the edges, while the rears wear more toward the centers.
The following users liked this post:
wstrohm (07-22-18)
Old 07-22-18, 03:56 PM
  #3  
Recovering Miataholic

Thread Starter
 
wstrohm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 1,531
Received 38 Likes on 26 Posts
Thanks, Dave. Seems normal, then.
Old 07-22-18, 05:28 PM
  #4  
Racecar - Formula 2000

 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, OH
Posts: 3,848
Received 277 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by wstrohm
Thanks, Dave. Seems normal, then.
Yes, at least for relatively-normal street use. All bets are off for cars used for track days, etc.
Old 07-23-18, 09:32 AM
  #5  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
A street driven FD, with some spirited driving, will wear out the rears first. Proper rotation will remedy this problem. That being said, if you are getting more than 15K out of a set of tires, you are not driving the car properly
Old 07-23-18, 10:25 AM
  #6  
Recovering Miataholic

Thread Starter
 
wstrohm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 1,531
Received 38 Likes on 26 Posts
if you are getting more than 15K out of a set of tires, you are not driving the car properly
It's wife's car, and she is "a little old lady from Pasadena." She actually kept the rev counter under 3K rpm for the 1st 1000 miles after the engine replacement! (I think now she is up to 4K rpm maximum.) I'm having a hard time convincing her to let me add TC-W3 premix now that it's broken in.
Old 07-24-18, 06:25 AM
  #7  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,011
Received 862 Likes on 611 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
A street driven FD, with some spirited driving, will wear out the rears first. Proper rotation will remedy this problem. That being said, if you are getting more than 15K out of a set of tires, you are not driving the car properly
Maybe it depends on the alignment used and tire width, but that’s not my experience. Front inside has always worn faster on my car with (IIRC) 1/2 degree more neg. camber front and rear than stock...”stock” toe. I typically have alignment checked with new tires. Rotation mitigates but with directional, doesn’t remedy. And IMO on a street car the wear-rating/compound has at least as much to do with mileage as how you drive. That said, more than 15k sounds like all-seasons.

Last edited by Sgtblue; 07-24-18 at 06:30 AM.
Old 07-24-18, 07:59 AM
  #8  
Racecar - Formula 2000

 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, OH
Posts: 3,848
Received 277 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgtblue

Maybe it depends on the alignment used and tire width, but that’s not my experience. Front inside has always worn faster on my car with (IIRC) 1/2 degree more neg. camber front and rear than stock...”stock” toe. I typically have alignment checked with new tires. Rotation mitigates but with directional, doesn’t remedy. And IMO on a street car the wear-rating/compound has at least as much to do with mileage as how you drive. That said, more than 15k sounds like all-seasons.
The RF inside wear is usually a result of repeatedly taking FWY entrance/exit ramps near the limit - hard to resist with an FD. The RF tire gets dragged across the road at high negative camber. Adding more negative for better handling makes that worse.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kenteth
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
8
11-09-04 09:59 PM
Barwick
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
1
11-02-01 10:42 PM
relvinnian
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
09-04-01 09:09 AM
Pele
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
8
08-21-01 05:51 PM



Quick Reply: Long-Term Tire Wear



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.