3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Interesting read on 3rd gen aerodynamics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-09, 11:41 PM
  #1  
bow leggin'

Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Scrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 6,061
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Interesting read on 3rd gen aerodynamics

I was searching for some info on testing the aerodynamics of a car by using strings and ran into this article. Not sure if it's been posted before, but thought it was interesting. I'd like to see how the air flows over my car with aftermarket aero parts.

http://autospeed.com/cms/A_108677/article.html

-Dan
Old 10-14-09, 12:05 AM
  #2  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Rollogic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wichita
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very interesting. I had read somewhere awhile ago that the FD had a coefficient drag of .28. Not much difference to squabble about, but just noting.
Old 10-14-09, 02:16 AM
  #3  
Non Runner

iTrader: (3)
 
Ceylon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 2,209
Received 276 Likes on 145 Posts
Interesting read.

Cheers.
Old 10-14-09, 09:46 AM
  #4  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
more info: with addition of '99 wing

Base R1/R2 99 JDM
wing n/a fixed 1° 5° 10° 14.5°
Cd 0.29 0.31 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.36
Clf 0.16 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Clr 0.08 0.08 0.00 -0.03 -0.06 -0.08

also for referance:

Corksport FD2 Wing
low mid high
0.37 0.38 0.39
0.07 0.08 0.09
0.01 -0.05 -0.10

and BMW M3, i forgot whicj=h version I pulled this from but it shows even in full race trim rear uplift and more harmful front uplift .. Mazda did an excellant job on the FD and even '99 wing does its job of planting front and rear down even more. All downforce takes is Hp to overcome the resulting drag.

M3 M3ST Race
0.31 0.30
0.21 0.10
0.13 0.01

Last edited by dgeesaman; 02-18-10 at 05:16 AM.
Old 10-14-09, 10:20 AM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (83)
 
Supernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Yea I remember reading this a while back. Great article. I'm glad you posted it. I lost the link a while back.
Old 02-16-10, 07:37 PM
  #6  
1 of 266 93 Base SSMs

iTrader: (6)
 
BridgePorted12A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Great post Dan! I have been searching for info regarding cd on the FD w/ an R1 wing vs. no wing vs. 99 wing. Anyone else want to contribute with a link/info regarding this issue?

According to the link Scrub posted, it looks like the R1 wing didn't reduce anymore lift coefficient in the rear, just more drag...but I want to challenge this by seeing if I or anyone else can scrounge up more credible info on this issue (to either confirm or challenge the above info in the link, b/c I would like to think that the R1 wing does supply some sort of benefit over nothing).

Ryan
Old 02-17-10, 02:58 AM
  #7  
Black Dynamite

iTrader: (1)
 
unreal-icarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 603
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
re-a also tested the 99spec wing and their own gt wing on track. results can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6_MUycoPPs
Old 02-17-10, 04:24 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
The 7 looked SO much more stable with that GT wing on the back.
Old 02-17-10, 06:44 AM
  #9  
Neo
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (3)
 
Neo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Aurora, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,878
Received 321 Likes on 164 Posts
After watching the vid, the drop in time from having no wing to the stock 99 wing is very good considering it's a factory part.
Of course, adding a GT style wing to a race course is nessasary since you're trying to lap the track as fast as you can.
Having a GT style wing for the street is a different matter.

After reviewing all of this, I might consider picking up a 99 spec spoiler to swap out my 94 spoiler.

I knew that spoiler didn't do much for the car, but it did give it a nice finishing touch. Since I have it back there already, and all its pretty much doing is adding drag, might as well swap it out to a 99 spec wing that is actually functional.
Have it on the medium angle so it can reduce the lift on the rear a bit.
Old 02-17-10, 12:31 PM
  #10  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,826
Received 2,592 Likes on 1,841 Posts
racing beat used the tape and string method for their GTU/GTO cars in the 80's
Old 02-18-10, 12:07 AM
  #11  
Bubblicious DEF.

iTrader: (36)
 
muibubbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 732
Posts: 4,265
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
wow kinda want a spoiler now.....
Old 02-18-10, 10:43 PM
  #12  
SideWayZ The Only Way

iTrader: (11)
 
FD3S2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davie, Florida
Posts: 4,854
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
looked better with the 99 spec, but preformed better with gt.. some reason the back of the car with the gt looks pretty good, but when i saw the car from front to side i just dont like it
Old 02-19-10, 11:41 PM
  #13  
Full Member

iTrader: (10)
 
Rotech7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brooksville Florida
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking about aerodynamics. The FD is the only car Ive ever driven in the rain & not got any water on the rear window. Thats wierd .!
Old 02-20-10, 12:59 PM
  #14  
bow leggin'

Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Scrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 6,061
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by FD3S2005
looked better with the 99 spec, but preformed better with gt.. some reason the back of the car with the gt looks pretty good, but when i saw the car from front to side i just dont like it
Looks aside it really depends on the type of driving you plan on doing. I will be running the 99 spec wing on my black car purely for function, it's not the prettiest wing out there but it works.....also black hides the lines of the wing
Old 02-20-10, 01:01 PM
  #15  
bow leggin'

Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Scrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 6,061
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotech7
Talking about aerodynamics. The FD is the only car Ive ever driven in the rain & not got any water on the rear window. Thats wierd .!
You must not be driving fast enough in the other cars hahaha. I was driving a Legacy GT in the rain the other day and had zero water on the rear window

Originally Posted by FD3S2005
looked better with the 99 spec, but preformed better with gt.. some reason the back of the car with the gt looks pretty good, but when i saw the car from front to side i just dont like it
Looks aside it really depends on the type of driving you plan on doing. I will be running the 99 spec wing on my black car purely for function, it's not the prettiest wing out there but it works.....also black hides the lines of the wing




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.