how to go from sequential to inline...?
12-19-03, 11:49 PM
#1
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how to go from sequential to inline...?
what are the steps i need to go from my sequential setup to inline, just take out the butterfly? i need ab oostcontroller too right?
12-20-03, 04:37 AM
#4
Registered RX7 Abuser
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: how to go from sequential to inline...?
Originally posted by wanarace74
what are the steps i need to go from my sequential setup to inline, just take out the butterfly? i need ab oostcontroller too right?
what are the steps i need to go from my sequential setup to inline, just take out the butterfly? i need ab oostcontroller too right?
http://www.scuderiaciriani.com/rx7/non-sequential.html
12-20-03, 02:06 PM
#5
Ee / Cpe
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gaithersburg, MD / WVU
Posts: 2,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
If you hear air blowing but your not getting any psi you should check your plastic elbow, your most likely leaking.....
Honestly, only go parellel as a last option. It ruins the fun of the car. IMO
Honestly, only go parellel as a last option. It ruins the fun of the car. IMO
Trending Topics
12-20-03, 04:02 PM
#8
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by REDNECK
then is there even a benefit?
then is there even a benefit?
- they have problems with the twin control system that they can't solve.
- the transition tends to get more violent as you mod the car and raise the boost. Non-sequential obviously eliminates this
- they regularly road race the car and the non-sequential torque curve is more predictable with no surprises
- they are deluding themselves thinking that non-sequential is more fun in street driving.
12-20-03, 05:08 PM
#9
Senior Member
Originally posted by rynberg
There's a difference between a boost leak and a problem with some aspect of the twin control system. Most people go non-sequential because:
- they have problems with the twin control system that they can't solve.
- the transition tends to get more violent as you mod the car and raise the boost. Non-sequential obviously eliminates this
- they regularly road race the car and the non-sequential torque curve is more predictable with no surprises
- they are deluding themselves thinking that non-sequential is more fun in street driving.
There's a difference between a boost leak and a problem with some aspect of the twin control system. Most people go non-sequential because:
- they have problems with the twin control system that they can't solve.
- the transition tends to get more violent as you mod the car and raise the boost. Non-sequential obviously eliminates this
- they regularly road race the car and the non-sequential torque curve is more predictable with no surprises
- they are deluding themselves thinking that non-sequential is more fun in street driving.
Mazda Australia raced there FD RX-7's in non-sequential form for the 92-93-94-95 Bathurst 12-hour. This was to ensure a predictable torque curve & get every last ounce of power from them.
Having driven there 95 race car both on the track & street, it was a complete dog until after 4000rpm & I would have hated it if it were a street machine.
Huh
12-20-03, 06:27 PM
#13
Originally posted by wanarace74
infact!!!!!!T the seoncd turbos intake... thats the wrong way.... you can hear it boosting OUT the second intake!!!!!
infact!!!!!!T the seoncd turbos intake... thats the wrong way.... you can hear it boosting OUT the second intake!!!!!
Check this site:
http://www.autosportracetech.com/RX-...leshooting.htm
Look at the area for the secondary boost.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
02-27-21 02:54 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
12
10-01-15 07:58 PM