Getting colder air
I have been reading threads and talking with a few people about getting a cold air box. From reading on the forum, I have seen that you can get sufficient air by doing the cold air box mod and having a K&N filter, (the K&N I have) but at which time a guy would have to do a fuel mod( I have DP and CB as well).
My question that I have is shouldn't the ECU compensate enough for colder air? I was thinking about driving my FD on a really cold day, even winter for extreme example, and picturing my car getting nice fresh cold air compared to a hot summers day. Wouldn't this be a huge change in relation to a stock box versus a cold air box? Some people drive there car in the winter(crazy if you ask me
) and surely they have no problems because of it
Could someone point out something I am missing?
My question that I have is shouldn't the ECU compensate enough for colder air? I was thinking about driving my FD on a really cold day, even winter for extreme example, and picturing my car getting nice fresh cold air compared to a hot summers day. Wouldn't this be a huge change in relation to a stock box versus a cold air box? Some people drive there car in the winter(crazy if you ask me
) and surely they have no problems because of itCould someone point out something I am missing?
Re: Getting colder air
Originally posted by ROTORHP
I have been reading threads and talking with a few people about getting a cold air box. From reading on the forum, I have seen that you can get sufficient air by doing the cold air box mod and having a K&N filter, (the K&N I have) but at which time a guy would have to do a fuel mod( I have DP and CB as well).
My question that I have is shouldn't the ECU compensate enough for colder air? I was thinking about driving my FD on a really cold day, even winter for extreme example, and picturing my car getting nice fresh cold air compared to a hot summers day. Wouldn't this be a huge change in relation to a stock box versus a cold air box? Some people drive there car in the winter(crazy if you ask me
) and surely they have no problems because of it
Could someone point out something I am missing?
I have been reading threads and talking with a few people about getting a cold air box. From reading on the forum, I have seen that you can get sufficient air by doing the cold air box mod and having a K&N filter, (the K&N I have) but at which time a guy would have to do a fuel mod( I have DP and CB as well).
My question that I have is shouldn't the ECU compensate enough for colder air? I was thinking about driving my FD on a really cold day, even winter for extreme example, and picturing my car getting nice fresh cold air compared to a hot summers day. Wouldn't this be a huge change in relation to a stock box versus a cold air box? Some people drive there car in the winter(crazy if you ask me
) and surely they have no problems because of itCould someone point out something I am missing?
Re: Re: Getting colder air
Originally posted by ZeroBanger
you dont need to worry about the ECU response for colder air. Regardless of the plethera of people that are going to come on here and flame my post, the colder air is not going to cause the ECU to run the car lean.
you dont need to worry about the ECU response for colder air. Regardless of the plethera of people that are going to come on here and flame my post, the colder air is not going to cause the ECU to run the car lean.
I read the thread about how you tested your car at the track with the ram air and such....interesting. Did you notice anything different when changing your system during the test, other than MPH outcomes?
I never changed out the system on the same day, but the results were done over a 9 month period running at sears pont every wed and sac raceway every saturday. I was able to take the many runs I ran without the ram air and the many with (with the stock box and the M2/rx-7fasion) and get an average.
What im trying to say is that even though I did not change the box on the same day, I also didn't do 1 or 2 runs, these were more than 60 or 70 runs.
Interms of feel its really hard to feel a different when you have a helmet on and two twin turbo's screaming. The trap speed was enough of a difference for me.
What im trying to say is that even though I did not change the box on the same day, I also didn't do 1 or 2 runs, these were more than 60 or 70 runs.
Interms of feel its really hard to feel a different when you have a helmet on and two twin turbo's screaming. The trap speed was enough of a difference for me.
Originally posted by ZeroBanger
Interms of feel its really hard to feel a different when you have a helmet on and two twin turbo's screaming. The trap speed was enough of a difference for me.
Interms of feel its really hard to feel a different when you have a helmet on and two twin turbo's screaming. The trap speed was enough of a difference for me.
Thanks for the info ZeroBanger
Trending Topics
The ECU does compensate for temp changes. The thing it doesn't compensate for is changes in how well the system flows. Opening up a better flow path to get air into the air box will change the flow. Even so, it seems pretty clear that you should be fine with the stock ECU, DP, CB, and modified air box.
-Max
-Max
Originally posted by maxcooper
The ECU does compensate for temp changes. The thing it doesn't compensate for is changes in how well the system flows. Opening up a better flow path to get air into the air box will change the flow. Even so, it seems pretty clear that you should be fine with the stock ECU, DP, CB, and modified air box.
-Max
The ECU does compensate for temp changes. The thing it doesn't compensate for is changes in how well the system flows. Opening up a better flow path to get air into the air box will change the flow. Even so, it seems pretty clear that you should be fine with the stock ECU, DP, CB, and modified air box.
-Max
Last edited by Sgtblue; Mar 5, 2004 at 04:44 AM.
Originally posted by maxcooper
The ECU does compensate for temp changes. The thing it doesn't compensate for is changes in how well the system flows. Opening up a better flow path to get air into the air box will change the flow. Even so, it seems pretty clear that you should be fine with the stock ECU, DP, CB, and modified air box.
-Max
The ECU does compensate for temp changes. The thing it doesn't compensate for is changes in how well the system flows. Opening up a better flow path to get air into the air box will change the flow. Even so, it seems pretty clear that you should be fine with the stock ECU, DP, CB, and modified air box.
-Max
Wouldn't the engine get only as much air as needed, not caring how well it flowed into it? Even if a guy had an aftermarket air box? Being a turbocharged engine, by the time you were into the gas you will allready be into boost. Am I right or am I right? Or would you get an increase in boost because of the flow? ...then a guy just controls that with the wastegate control(Home Depot control)????
Originally posted by ROTORHP
Wouldn't the engine get only as much air as needed, not caring how well it flowed into it? Even if a guy had an aftermarket air box? Being a turbocharged engine, by the time you were into the gas you will allready be into boost. Am I right or am I right? Or would you get an increase in boost because of the flow? ...then a guy just controls that with the wastegate control(Home Depot control)????
Wouldn't the engine get only as much air as needed, not caring how well it flowed into it? Even if a guy had an aftermarket air box? Being a turbocharged engine, by the time you were into the gas you will allready be into boost. Am I right or am I right? Or would you get an increase in boost because of the flow? ...then a guy just controls that with the wastegate control(Home Depot control)????
The fuel maps have "baked in" assumptions about how well the whole engine system flows air. These assumptions become invalid as you increase the flow capacity of the engine systems. The ECU samples the air temp and pressure, but does not directly measure flow. So, if you increase the amount of air flow, you will run leaner that you did before. In the case of a minor flow change and the stock ECU, you'll still be fine since the stock maps are reported to be very, very rich.
NOTE: Other cars' ECUs do measure flow with hot wires and flapper doors. Those systems are called "mass-air". The FD just uses a different kind of fuel injection control system known as "speed-density".
I have an incomplete but perhaps still usefully instructive web page that may explain why changing the amount of restriction in the intake will affect the flow of the system:
http://www.maxcooper.com/rx7/how-to/...ystem/why.html
-Max
NOTE: Other cars' ECUs do measure flow with hot wires and flapper doors. Those systems are called "mass-air". The FD just uses a different kind of fuel injection control system known as "speed-density".
I have an incomplete but perhaps still usefully instructive web page that may explain why changing the amount of restriction in the intake will affect the flow of the system:
http://www.maxcooper.com/rx7/how-to/...ystem/why.html
-Max
Last edited by maxcooper; Mar 5, 2004 at 08:38 PM.
Adding a DP, CB, and intake will most likely cause your car to boost over 12 psi. Possibly over 13 psi. I recommend installing a boost controller with those mods, and the stock ECU.
Originally posted by adam c
Adding a DP, CB, and intake will most likely cause your car to boost over 12 psi. Possibly over 13 psi. I recommend installing a boost controller with those mods, and the stock ECU.
Adding a DP, CB, and intake will most likely cause your car to boost over 12 psi. Possibly over 13 psi. I recommend installing a boost controller with those mods, and the stock ECU.
Thanks for the info Max. I'll check your page out...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
PinkRacer
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
43
Oct 1, 2015 09:13 AM






