3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Full Non Sequntial Should I Go For It?>

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:06 PM
  #1  
damimfast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: new york
Full Non Sequntial Should I Go For It?>

hey guy,

im about to do a non sequntial for my car but i dont know is it worth it? i only have a intake, cat back,koyo rad,dp, and a stock euc, if i do the non sequntial i will get a mbc

what do i get out of a non sequntial turbos? more power? less lag? is it good for the car?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:14 PM
  #2  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Arrow

Check this thread:

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/contemplating-going-non-sequential-330761/
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:26 PM
  #3  
TwinTurbo93's Avatar
0-rotor-0-turbo-0-fd
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: NYC
A word of advice: DON'T DO IT!

I did lots of mods to my car and I don't regret none of them exept for the non-seq conversion.
The non-seq. setup is only good for track or dragg use, you get more boost at high rpm's and it keeps it hard to redline, you loose the fun of street driving and quick spool-up.

If I could go back to seq. I'd do it without thinking twice but I eliminated everything so I'm screwed.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 01:40 PM
  #4  
2a+RoN's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
From: chandler, AZ
it really all depends on what you are looking for. If you are asking b/w full non-seq and poor man's, I say full all the way, but maybe try poor man's first so you get the idea of how it feels.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 02:54 PM
  #5  
rceron's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Your line of questioning seems to imply that you haven't done enough research. Read the thousands of threads on the topic and you will get a very good idea of all the pro's and con's.

R
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 06:03 PM
  #6  
skunks's Avatar
I'm a CF and poop smith
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
just do the temp/poor man's one. its damn near the same thing and is reversible. it takes about 30 mins to do if you have all the little caps and stuff and is totally reversible. what are you using your car for BTW?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 06:04 PM
  #7  
XSTransAm's Avatar
Ee / Cpe
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,843
Likes: 2
From: Gaithersburg, MD / WVU
my vote is no.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 06:08 PM
  #8  
mad_7tist's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
From: tampa
no. it is dumb if the seq works.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 06:30 PM
  #9  
level7's Avatar
Search Button Advocate
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 459
Likes: 63
From: 208
Originally Posted by rceron
Your line of questioning seems to imply that you haven't done enough research. Read the thousands of threads on the topic and you will get a very good idea of all the pro's and con's.

R
yeah seriously, that topic could have its own forum, right next to "no secondary boost."

i tried non-seq and liked it for a day or two, then the novelty quickly diminished as i realized sequential was much more pleasing for daily driving. so i switched back. i would only recommend non-seq for people who cant remedy their boost issues. so to answer your question, "no."
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 07:29 PM
  #10  
damimfast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: new york
thank you
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 09:22 PM
  #11  
Enconsiderate's Avatar
I am so smrt.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Torrance, CA
damimfast,

it strongly depends if your motor is ported or not. if the exhaust side is ported you will prob. enjoy it! if not you can look foward to slower boosting (like someone else already said)

i have heard a few people say they strongly prefer the non seq., but all those peope run ported motors.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 09:53 PM
  #12  
Railgun's Avatar
I won't let go
Veteran: Marine Corp
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 23
From: Chi -> Maidstone
I say do it. But my definition of non-seq is going single.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 10:38 PM
  #13  
Slam Pig
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by Enconsiderate
damimfast,

it strongly depends if your motor is ported or not. if the exhaust side is ported you will prob. enjoy it! if not you can look foward to slower boosting (like someone else already said)

i have heard a few people say they strongly prefer the non seq., but all those peope run ported motors.

good point....i got a large street port and run non seq...the exhaust ports spool the turbos within inches of thier life......
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Group Buy & Product Dev. FD RX-7
7
Mar 21, 2018 11:19 AM
JoesFC
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Oct 5, 2015 08:10 AM
Monsterbox
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
Sep 11, 2015 03:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.