3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Full Non Sequntial Should I Go For It?>

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-04, 12:06 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
damimfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: new york
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Full Non Sequntial Should I Go For It?>

hey guy,

im about to do a non sequntial for my car but i dont know is it worth it? i only have a intake, cat back,koyo rad,dp, and a stock euc, if i do the non sequntial i will get a mbc

what do i get out of a non sequntial turbos? more power? less lag? is it good for the car?
Old 07-28-04, 12:14 PM
  #2  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Arrow

Check this thread:

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/contemplating-going-non-sequential-330761/
Old 07-28-04, 12:26 PM
  #3  
0-rotor-0-turbo-0-fd

 
TwinTurbo93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A word of advice: DON'T DO IT!

I did lots of mods to my car and I don't regret none of them exept for the non-seq conversion.
The non-seq. setup is only good for track or dragg use, you get more boost at high rpm's and it keeps it hard to redline, you loose the fun of street driving and quick spool-up.

If I could go back to seq. I'd do it without thinking twice but I eliminated everything so I'm screwed.
Old 07-28-04, 01:40 PM
  #4  
Rotary Freak

 
2a+RoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it really all depends on what you are looking for. If you are asking b/w full non-seq and poor man's, I say full all the way, but maybe try poor man's first so you get the idea of how it feels.
Old 07-28-04, 02:54 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
rceron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your line of questioning seems to imply that you haven't done enough research. Read the thousands of threads on the topic and you will get a very good idea of all the pro's and con's.

R
Old 07-28-04, 06:03 PM
  #6  
I'm a CF and poop smith

 
skunks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
just do the temp/poor man's one. its damn near the same thing and is reversible. it takes about 30 mins to do if you have all the little caps and stuff and is totally reversible. what are you using your car for BTW?
Old 07-28-04, 06:04 PM
  #7  
Ee / Cpe

 
XSTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gaithersburg, MD / WVU
Posts: 2,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
my vote is no.
Old 07-28-04, 06:08 PM
  #8  
Rotary Freak

 
mad_7tist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: tampa
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no. it is dumb if the seq works.
Old 07-28-04, 06:30 PM
  #9  
Search Button Advocate

iTrader: (3)
 
level7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: 208
Posts: 452
Received 60 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by rceron
Your line of questioning seems to imply that you haven't done enough research. Read the thousands of threads on the topic and you will get a very good idea of all the pro's and con's.

R
yeah seriously, that topic could have its own forum, right next to "no secondary boost."

i tried non-seq and liked it for a day or two, then the novelty quickly diminished as i realized sequential was much more pleasing for daily driving. so i switched back. i would only recommend non-seq for people who cant remedy their boost issues. so to answer your question, "no."
Old 07-28-04, 07:29 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
damimfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: new york
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thank you
Old 07-28-04, 09:22 PM
  #11  
I am so smrt.

 
Enconsiderate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damimfast,

it strongly depends if your motor is ported or not. if the exhaust side is ported you will prob. enjoy it! if not you can look foward to slower boosting (like someone else already said)

i have heard a few people say they strongly prefer the non seq., but all those peope run ported motors.
Old 07-28-04, 09:53 PM
  #12  
I won't let go


 
Railgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chi -> Maidstone
Posts: 3,861
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
I say do it. But my definition of non-seq is going single.
Old 07-28-04, 10:38 PM
  #13  
Slam Pig

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Enconsiderate
damimfast,

it strongly depends if your motor is ported or not. if the exhaust side is ported you will prob. enjoy it! if not you can look foward to slower boosting (like someone else already said)

i have heard a few people say they strongly prefer the non seq., but all those peope run ported motors.

good point....i got a large street port and run non seq...the exhaust ports spool the turbos within inches of thier life......
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Group Buy & Product Dev. FD RX-7
7
03-21-18 11:19 AM
JoesFC
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
10-05-15 08:10 AM
Monsterbox
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
09-11-15 03:29 PM



Quick Reply: Full Non Sequntial Should I Go For It?>



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 PM.