RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/)
-   -   Full Non Sequntial Should I Go For It?> (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/full-non-sequntial-should-i-go-332426/)

damimfast 07-28-04 12:06 PM

Full Non Sequntial Should I Go For It?>
 
hey guy,

im about to do a non sequntial for my car but i dont know is it worth it? i only have a intake, cat back,koyo rad,dp, and a stock euc, if i do the non sequntial i will get a mbc

what do i get out of a non sequntial turbos? more power? less lag? is it good for the car?

Mahjik 07-28-04 12:14 PM

Check this thread:

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/contemplating-going-non-sequential-330761/

TwinTurbo93 07-28-04 12:26 PM

A word of advice: DON'T DO IT!

I did lots of mods to my car and I don't regret none of them exept for the non-seq conversion.
The non-seq. setup is only good for track or dragg use, you get more boost at high rpm's and it keeps it hard to redline, you loose the fun of street driving and quick spool-up.

If I could go back to seq. I'd do it without thinking twice but I eliminated everything so I'm screwed. :(

2a+RoN 07-28-04 01:40 PM

it really all depends on what you are looking for. If you are asking b/w full non-seq and poor man's, I say full all the way, but maybe try poor man's first so you get the idea of how it feels.

rceron 07-28-04 02:54 PM

Your line of questioning seems to imply that you haven't done enough research. Read the thousands of threads on the topic and you will get a very good idea of all the pro's and con's.

R

skunks 07-28-04 06:03 PM

just do the temp/poor man's one. its damn near the same thing and is reversible. it takes about 30 mins to do if you have all the little caps and stuff and is totally reversible. what are you using your car for BTW?

XSTransAm 07-28-04 06:04 PM

my vote is no.

mad_7tist 07-28-04 06:08 PM

no. it is dumb if the seq works.

level7 07-28-04 06:30 PM


Originally Posted by rceron
Your line of questioning seems to imply that you haven't done enough research. Read the thousands of threads on the topic and you will get a very good idea of all the pro's and con's.

R

yeah seriously, that topic could have its own forum, right next to "no secondary boost."

i tried non-seq and liked it for a day or two, then the novelty quickly diminished as i realized sequential was much more pleasing for daily driving. so i switched back. i would only recommend non-seq for people who cant remedy their boost issues. so to answer your question, "no."

damimfast 07-28-04 07:29 PM

thank you

Enconsiderate 07-28-04 09:22 PM

damimfast,

it strongly depends if your motor is ported or not. if the exhaust side is ported you will prob. enjoy it! if not you can look foward to slower boosting (like someone else already said)

i have heard a few people say they strongly prefer the non seq., but all those peope run ported motors.

Railgun 07-28-04 09:53 PM

I say do it. But my definition of non-seq is going single. :D

obviousboy 07-28-04 10:38 PM


Originally Posted by Enconsiderate
damimfast,

it strongly depends if your motor is ported or not. if the exhaust side is ported you will prob. enjoy it! if not you can look foward to slower boosting (like someone else already said)

i have heard a few people say they strongly prefer the non seq., but all those peope run ported motors.


good point....i got a large street port and run non seq...the exhaust ports spool the turbos within inches of thier life......


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands