3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Fuel Pump question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 12:18 PM
  #1  
WONG FRIED RICE's Avatar
Thread Starter
R.I.P. GuitarJunkie28
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: san francisco, ca
Fuel Pump question

would it be ok to just throw in a fuel pump and no management? I'm running a fully open exhaust, meaning no cats watsoever. I have a boost controller and it holds boost at the standard 10-8-10 pattern.

OR do i even need more fuel since boost is still at stock levels? I don't have the funds for a PFC just yet...so i want to do what i can in the mean time.

My friend gave me a turbo supra fuel pump out of his car so i wouldn't be spending any money on a fuel pump.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 12:50 PM
  #2  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,724
From: Pensacola, FL
I don't think you'd get much if anything from the Supra pump. It's pretty conservative.

Upgraded pumps just flow more fuel to meet demand. If you run higher fuel pressure or larger injectors, the stock pump wouldn't be able to keep up. Just putting in the pump won't get you more fuel - the exception is the Walbro in some cases. It moves a LOT of fuel, and I've seen it overrun stock fuel pressure regulators resulting in higher fuel pressures at the rail.

The general concensus is if you keep it at 10psi with the stock ECU, you'll be OK. But, I would put that PowerFC in before you go any farther - I'd keep the stock intake as well to stay on the safe side. PFC's go for around $800 now with commander, so it's QUITE affordable for what all it can do for your car.

Dale
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #3  
importrx7's Avatar
To Live Is To Die
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Mansfield Ohio
Just keep the pump until you've got the upgrades that will require you to need it!!
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #4  
WONG FRIED RICE's Avatar
Thread Starter
R.I.P. GuitarJunkie28
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: san francisco, ca
Originally Posted by DaleClark
the exception is the Walbro in some cases. It moves a LOT of fuel, and I've seen it overrun stock fuel pressure regulators resulting in higher fuel pressures at the rail.
Dale
So is it a bad thing using the Walbro to 'try' and bump up the fuel pressure? Say it becomes a case where it DOES result in higher fuel pressure...will it harm anything else? i know it's probably not the way to go...and i probably won't do it, but i'm just curious as to what would happen.

kev
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 01:53 PM
  #5  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by WONG FRIED RICE
So is it a bad thing using the Walbro to 'try' and bump up the fuel pressure? Say it becomes a case where it DOES result in higher fuel pressure...will it harm anything else? i know it's probably not the way to go...and i probably won't do it, but i'm just curious as to what would happen.

kev

Just adding a fuel pump won't increase your fuel pressure. Unless you replace the Fuel Pressure Regulator, you'll still be supplying the same amount of fuel regardless of the fuel pump (unless you use a fuel pump that is so strong it overwelms the FPR).
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #6  
Ralgh's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Thousand Oaks, CA
My understanding is that the stock computer is too conservative. With too many mods it just can't command enough fuel regardless of the pump.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #7  
potatochobit's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
i thought the stock ECU ran rich compared to the PFC with minor bolt ons?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 06:15 PM
  #8  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by potatochobit
i thought the stock ECU ran rich compared to the PFC with minor bolt ons?
At 10 PSI on the stock twins, yes.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #9  
Cgotto6's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 60
From: Maltby, Washington
Originally Posted by Mahjik
At 10 PSI on the stock twins, yes.
Doesnt that all have to do with the PFC's tune?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 06:38 PM
  #10  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by Cgotto6
Doesnt that all have to do with the PFC's tune?
Yes, I believe potatochobit was implying about the PFC "base map".
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #11  
Cgotto6's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 60
From: Maltby, Washington
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Yes, I believe potatochobit was implying about the PFC "base map".
Gottcha. For some reason that didnt even cross my mind.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
Rotospectre
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Mar 28, 2018 03:33 PM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 AM.