3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Fuel Pump question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-05, 12:18 PM
  #1  
R.I.P. GuitarJunkie28

Thread Starter
 
WONG FRIED RICE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Pump question

would it be ok to just throw in a fuel pump and no management? I'm running a fully open exhaust, meaning no cats watsoever. I have a boost controller and it holds boost at the standard 10-8-10 pattern.

OR do i even need more fuel since boost is still at stock levels? I don't have the funds for a PFC just yet...so i want to do what i can in the mean time.

My friend gave me a turbo supra fuel pump out of his car so i wouldn't be spending any money on a fuel pump.
Old 09-29-05, 12:50 PM
  #2  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,438 Likes on 1,509 Posts
I don't think you'd get much if anything from the Supra pump. It's pretty conservative.

Upgraded pumps just flow more fuel to meet demand. If you run higher fuel pressure or larger injectors, the stock pump wouldn't be able to keep up. Just putting in the pump won't get you more fuel - the exception is the Walbro in some cases. It moves a LOT of fuel, and I've seen it overrun stock fuel pressure regulators resulting in higher fuel pressures at the rail.

The general concensus is if you keep it at 10psi with the stock ECU, you'll be OK. But, I would put that PowerFC in before you go any farther - I'd keep the stock intake as well to stay on the safe side. PFC's go for around $800 now with commander, so it's QUITE affordable for what all it can do for your car.

Dale
Old 09-29-05, 01:16 PM
  #3  
To Live Is To Die

 
importrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mansfield Ohio
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just keep the pump until you've got the upgrades that will require you to need it!!
Old 09-29-05, 01:24 PM
  #4  
R.I.P. GuitarJunkie28

Thread Starter
 
WONG FRIED RICE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaleClark
the exception is the Walbro in some cases. It moves a LOT of fuel, and I've seen it overrun stock fuel pressure regulators resulting in higher fuel pressures at the rail.
Dale
So is it a bad thing using the Walbro to 'try' and bump up the fuel pressure? Say it becomes a case where it DOES result in higher fuel pressure...will it harm anything else? i know it's probably not the way to go...and i probably won't do it, but i'm just curious as to what would happen.

kev
Old 09-29-05, 01:53 PM
  #5  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by WONG FRIED RICE
So is it a bad thing using the Walbro to 'try' and bump up the fuel pressure? Say it becomes a case where it DOES result in higher fuel pressure...will it harm anything else? i know it's probably not the way to go...and i probably won't do it, but i'm just curious as to what would happen.

kev

Just adding a fuel pump won't increase your fuel pressure. Unless you replace the Fuel Pressure Regulator, you'll still be supplying the same amount of fuel regardless of the fuel pump (unless you use a fuel pump that is so strong it overwelms the FPR).
Old 09-29-05, 06:53 PM
  #6  
Full Member

 
Ralgh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My understanding is that the stock computer is too conservative. With too many mods it just can't command enough fuel regardless of the pump.
Old 09-30-05, 04:03 PM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
potatochobit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i thought the stock ECU ran rich compared to the PFC with minor bolt ons?
Old 09-30-05, 06:15 PM
  #8  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by potatochobit
i thought the stock ECU ran rich compared to the PFC with minor bolt ons?
At 10 PSI on the stock twins, yes.
Old 09-30-05, 06:33 PM
  #9  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (8)
 
Cgotto6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bothell, Washington
Posts: 1,893
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
At 10 PSI on the stock twins, yes.
Doesnt that all have to do with the PFC's tune?
Old 09-30-05, 06:38 PM
  #10  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Cgotto6
Doesnt that all have to do with the PFC's tune?
Yes, I believe potatochobit was implying about the PFC "base map".
Old 09-30-05, 08:01 PM
  #11  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (8)
 
Cgotto6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bothell, Washington
Posts: 1,893
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Yes, I believe potatochobit was implying about the PFC "base map".
Gottcha. For some reason that didnt even cross my mind.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
Rotospectre
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
03-28-18 03:33 PM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
11-17-15 05:57 PM



Quick Reply: Fuel Pump question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.