FD V 2005 C6 Corvette
#26
More Mazdas than Sense
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sunny Downtown Fenwick
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look at ne new vette in person. I was less than thrilled with the pics until we got a few here at work.
So much detail in the body. Very VERY pretty.
So much detail in the body. Very VERY pretty.
#28
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its not that I hate the looks of the car... there are just things that I dislke. But as far as bang for the buck is concerned, there is really noting in the same class. So Im willing to sacrifice a little aesthetic's for performance.
#29
The Ricer Eliminator
It seems more than a few people(at my work) have said they don't like it in pictures but like it a lot more in person.
I have yet to get close to one. I felt the same way about the 350Z.
I have yet to get close to one. I felt the same way about the 350Z.
#31
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by SkEltAh
I have driven a couple of them(vettes), and was pleasantly suprised. The 350z on the other hand imho is worthless; ugly and heavy.
However, I have a daugher so I need good rear seat access (RX-8 coming after winter).
#33
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To each his own huh.. Mahjik? I just couldnt get into the way they drive. They feel heavy and kinda cumbersome. Not to mention that I dislike the styling. Why dont you get a G35 instead? IMHO they look much better, and I think they even have a back seat.
#34
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (9)
I guess I really need to drive a C5 Z06, or a C6, because i've driven a regular old C5, and wasn't impressed at all with the handling. Grip it had, but it felt just like all of the many corvettes, mustangs, camaros, firebirds, etc. i've driven... like a 2-seater malibu or fairmont with big tires.
Plus, at at 5'9" and 175 lbs, I always feel like a midget in american sports cars... I can't see over the dash, and the door latches are big enough to put your arm through... it's like that Fisher Price telephone i had as a toddler.
Plus, at at 5'9" and 175 lbs, I always feel like a midget in american sports cars... I can't see over the dash, and the door latches are big enough to put your arm through... it's like that Fisher Price telephone i had as a toddler.
#35
STi Boxer power!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by J.S.J
There is one other difference, the Vet has a much smoother/quieter ride. There something to be said about being civilized.
I doubt you are likely to see "Dude, how do I make my Vet louder" or "I picked up some hot chick in my vette" thread on the corvette forums. Older crowd = less crap to sift through. Corvettes have that way above us..
#36
The Ricer Eliminator
Originally Posted by bricke
The vette also has a more mature crowd, generally speaking. I consider that a good thing in my book.
I doubt you are likely to see "Dude, how do I make my Vet louder" or "I picked up some hot chick in my vette" thread on the corvette forums.
I doubt you are likely to see "Dude, how do I make my Vet louder" or "I picked up some hot chick in my vette" thread on the corvette forums.
#37
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by SkEltAh
To each his own huh.. Mahjik? I just couldnt get into the way they drive. They feel heavy and kinda cumbersome. Not to mention that I dislike the styling. Why dont you get a G35 instead? IMHO they look much better, and I think they even have a back seat.
I'm not saying a 350z is in the same league has a Vette or FD for handling, but then again I'm not looking for track performance in a daily driver.
As far as the styling, you can't argue on that as it's a personal preference. But, I used to own a '94 300zx (7+ years ago). It was the perfect balance between sports/luxury car. One of the most trouble-free cars I've ever had.
#38
The Ricer Eliminator
I had a buddy that had one and he said the same thing. He really liked the balance between luxury and performance on it.
In fact, he actually been toying around the idea of getting one again.
In fact, he actually been toying around the idea of getting one again.
#39
~17 MPG
iTrader: (2)
Howard, I agree with most of what you wrote there, but you seem to have neglected one important thing: area under the curve. The new 'vette has 300ft/lbs torque at 1000 RPMs. That's a good amount more than the RX-7's peak torque, which isn't available until the secondary turbo kicks in.
Also, the Corvette has an insane amount of rubber putting all that power to the ground. These two things are the main reason that their otherwise inferior chassis can make it around an autocross course faster than a 3rd-Gen RX-7, assuming equal driver skill.
But, with modern advances in rotary engines (Renesis engine has much less overlap, and better combustion chamber sealing), turbochargers, and lightweight materials available at reasonable prices, there's no reason Mazda couldn't build a 350+HP, sub-2600lb FE3S RX-7. And it should sell in today's market, which seems to be finally gravitating back to sportscars.
-s-
C6 engine info taken from: http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=841425
Also, the Corvette has an insane amount of rubber putting all that power to the ground. These two things are the main reason that their otherwise inferior chassis can make it around an autocross course faster than a 3rd-Gen RX-7, assuming equal driver skill.
But, with modern advances in rotary engines (Renesis engine has much less overlap, and better combustion chamber sealing), turbochargers, and lightweight materials available at reasonable prices, there's no reason Mazda couldn't build a 350+HP, sub-2600lb FE3S RX-7. And it should sell in today's market, which seems to be finally gravitating back to sportscars.
-s-
C6 engine info taken from: http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=841425
#41
Lives on the Forum
I notice that nobody has brought up the issue of gas mileage...
The Z06 is heavier. Check.
The Z06 makes about 150 more hp. Check.
The Z06 has poorer aero numbers. Check.
The Z06 gets much better mileage than any FD could ever hope to acheive?
Hmmmmmm. Them old tech 2 valve pushrod motors must know something the rotary doesn't.
The Z06 is heavier. Check.
The Z06 makes about 150 more hp. Check.
The Z06 has poorer aero numbers. Check.
The Z06 gets much better mileage than any FD could ever hope to acheive?
Hmmmmmm. Them old tech 2 valve pushrod motors must know something the rotary doesn't.
#42
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by DamonB
I notice that nobody has brought up the issue of gas mileage...
The Z06 gets much better mileage than any FD could ever hope to acheive?
The Z06 gets much better mileage than any FD could ever hope to acheive?
#43
~17 MPG
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by jimlab
"otherwise inferior chassis"
How did you decide this?
How did you decide this?
-s-
#44
FD = Mr. Toad's Wild Ride
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimlab
How did you decide this?
When you decided to stick a Chevy engine into a Mazda chassis. You sure didn't pick it and go through all the work to put it in an inferior chassis did you?
[/sarcasm]
On a more serious note the FD chassis has much more potential for the reasons Howard described. I think a Vette would have a hard time competing in SM2 for autocross with a properly setup FD...We'll see soon here at nationals.
For road courses its really hard to say since a lot of the racing leagues don't allow forced induction (especially those the Vettes choose to run in). I expect that a JGTC setup FD would run better lap times than a GT Vette. Maybe with some JGTC races coming to the USA we'll get to see GT/JGTC cars run in mixed class events on the same track, same weekend so we can compare times.
For drag racing the chassis is lighter and has more weight on the rear....need I say more?
P.S. This is specifically just chassis, this is not engine, drivetrain, brakes, etc...
P.P.S. The Vette vs. FD here reminds me a lot of the Skyline vs. FD debate that went on in Japan, two different ways to get from point A to point B, both with merit and both get the job done.
Last edited by TracyRX7; 08-05-04 at 06:24 PM.
#45
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Originally Posted by DamonB
I notice that nobody has brought up the issue of gas mileage...
The Z06 is heavier. Check.
The Z06 makes about 150 more hp. Check.
The Z06 has poorer aero numbers. Check.
The Z06 gets much better mileage than any FD could ever hope to acheive?
Hmmmmmm. Them old tech 2 valve pushrod motors must know something the rotary doesn't.
The Z06 is heavier. Check.
The Z06 makes about 150 more hp. Check.
The Z06 has poorer aero numbers. Check.
The Z06 gets much better mileage than any FD could ever hope to acheive?
Hmmmmmm. Them old tech 2 valve pushrod motors must know something the rotary doesn't.
Also my post in the anti-det thread regarding "thermodynamic efficiency of various combustion chamber types"...
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lexington, IL
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Howard, good points as usual. But the bottom line for me is that I'm getting 20 mpg stock - combined city and country driving. ANDDDDDDD, I can afford payments on an FD!
PS: One other benefit to the FD: Bloomington, IL (where I work) is the former home of Bloomington Gold, the Corvette equivalent to SevenStock. We have a few zillion Corvettes here in town. I think I've got the only drivable 3G within 40 miles and it really makes all those Vette driver nervous at stoplights. A very unique feeling. LOL.
PS: One other benefit to the FD: Bloomington, IL (where I work) is the former home of Bloomington Gold, the Corvette equivalent to SevenStock. We have a few zillion Corvettes here in town. I think I've got the only drivable 3G within 40 miles and it really makes all those Vette driver nervous at stoplights. A very unique feeling. LOL.
#47
Shiftin' and Smokin'
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by DamonB
I notice that nobody has brought up the issue of gas mileage...
The Z06 gets much better mileage than any FD could ever hope to acheive?
Hmmmmmm. Them old tech 2 valve pushrod motors must know something the rotary doesn't.
The Z06 gets much better mileage than any FD could ever hope to acheive?
Hmmmmmm. Them old tech 2 valve pushrod motors must know something the rotary doesn't.
Wrong! Sorry. My FD with the stock twins dynoing 340RWHP got me from Niagara Falls Canada to Columbus Ohio on 1 tank of gas. The whole tank that is, but whatever. As long as you are not boosting, you get pretty good gas mileage. NO WAY a small bock 350 Chevy with 400 horses will do that, no way. As a general rule of thumb, bigger cubes=worse gas mileage.
When a rotary is not under boost, it's a 79 c.i. motor(ported in my case).
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
If I didn't need access to a rear seat, I'd have a base "cheap" 350z for a daily driver in a heart beat.
However, I have a daugher so I need good rear seat access (RX-8 coming after winter).
However, I have a daugher so I need good rear seat access (RX-8 coming after winter).
HMm.. good rear seats... I would go grab an STi or EVO .
4 door, econobox - with a damn stout engine. If I ever need a daily driver, I think Evo will be my first choice. Willl leave the luxury for the wife..er.. that si when I find one.
#50
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by TracyRX7
For road courses its really hard to say since a lot of the racing leagues don't allow forced induction (especially those the Vettes choose to run in). I expect that a JGTC setup FD would run better lap times than a GT Vette. Maybe with some JGTC races coming to the USA we'll get to see GT/JGTC cars run in mixed class events on the same track, same weekend so we can compare times.