3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

FD Listed Among "10 Future Classics to Buy Right Now"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 12:20 AM
  #1  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Thumbs up FD Listed Among "10 Future Classics to Buy Right Now"

Glad to see others are appreciating the overall value you get with an FD...one of the greatest performance platforms/dollar spent IMO: 10 Future Classics to Buy Right Now

It's also included on another list: 8 Awesome Discontinued Cars That We Want Back

Enjoy
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 02:38 AM
  #2  
thatdon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 313
Likes: 11
From: LA
At least they didn't butcher the description like they did on the NSX...

"When the NSX appeared on U.S. shores in 1991 with a mid-mounted 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6 pumping out 270 horsepower"
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 09:35 AM
  #3  
moosejaw's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 8
From: Miami
FD Listed Among "10 Future Classics to Buy Right Now"

Thank god I bought a GTU instead of the corrado next to it in Gunther VWMazdas used car lot in 1992
If I bought that corrado I wouldn't be here right now and probably own some slammed Jetta with a check engine light on
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 09:52 AM
  #4  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
The new miata should have been the new improved S2k

Mazda again blew it. You can't keep making the exact same car for 25 years and expect a different result. F?????cking idiots.

Next up a retro RX7 like the original FB maybe that can replace both the FD and the S2k. A 2500 pound car with 300 HP would sell like hot cakes.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 09:55 AM
  #5  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by thatdon
at least they didn't butcher the description like they did on the nsx...

"when the nsx appeared on u.s. Shores in 1991 with a mid-mounted 3.0-liter twin-turbo v6 pumping out 270 horsepower"
lol

My top 10:
FD
S2k
e30 m3
911 air cooled/small/light 930,964,993
Supra
260z
NSX
300zx
sti/evo
acura integra

Last edited by Fritz Flynn; Aug 16, 2015 at 10:00 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 12:47 PM
  #6  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by gmonsen
And, I've been trying to get my wife into an older Defender for some time. They are still the best utility vehicle, imho.
Or an 80s series LandCruiser. But then again, I'm a bit biased
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 04:21 PM
  #7  
moosejaw's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 8
From: Miami
FD Listed Among "10 Future Classics to Buy Right Now"

You know what's funny all these cars from the late 80s and 90s were great cars. They're not around anymore
Manufacturers would rather stick with making SUVs and CUVs. Look at Lexus, they regretted making the RC-F Bc their dealers were demanding more SUVs. These one off sports cars don't cut it anymore not when a Toyota dealer can sell 30 plus camrys in one day. I'm surprised they even considered making the FT86. There is no business case for any manufacturer to put out a $20-30k small coupe/2seater these days. Every manufacturer is trying to aim for that six/seven figure mark
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 04:58 PM
  #8  
Spirit-RE's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 39
From: Whitewater, WI
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
The new miata should have been the new improved S2k

Mazda again blew it. You can't keep making the exact same car for 25 years and expect a different result. F?????cking idiots.
Because sales of the miata have always been terrible
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 05:01 PM
  #9  
spikej's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 37
Likes: 2
From: la
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
lol

My top 10:
FD
S2k
e30 m3
911 air cooled/small/light 930,964,993
Supra
260z
NSX
300zx
sti/evo
acura integra
I have your top 4! 😊
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 08:53 PM
  #10  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by Spirit-RE
Because sales of the miata have always been terrible
OH yeah you're right it's very popular sports car LOL

It will also likely be voted top 10 car again. Not sure how they keep pulling that off.

I think they sold what like 75k NCs over 10 years.

Ford likely sold 100k mustangs this year.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2015 | 09:11 PM
  #11  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by spikej
I have your top 4! 😊
That's a nice collection
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 09:51 AM
  #12  
Halfbridge's Avatar
Brap Brap Brap
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 1
From: Dublin, OH
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
OH yeah you're right it's very popular sports car LOL

It will also likely be voted top 10 car again. Not sure how they keep pulling that off.

I think they sold what like 75k NCs over 10 years.

Ford likely sold 100k mustangs this year.
Most people who buy Mustangs aren't car guys or automotive enthusiasts. Yes, there are many, but let's look at the flipside--how many Miata owners do you know who are not car guys or automotive enthusiasts? I know very few.

Mustang because 'merica!
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 10:56 AM
  #13  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
The mustang like the corvette has come a long long way and there are way more enthusiast driving them than miatas.

I rarely see miatas at the track but there are mustangs all over the place. Edit before someones slams me with the whole more mazda's raced..... Yep there are lots of miata race cars at a NASA event

The new GT 350R is on my radar. Looks like a exceptional value all things considered and with a V8 revving past 8k RPMs is going to sound pretty damn cool as well.

I don't see MOST car enthusiast giving the new miata a 1st look much less a second.

Again it's just like the 1st gen only weird looking with more nonsense that most ENTHUSIASTS don't want.

I'd buy a used S2k etc.... long before the new miata.

The 1st gen has sold more than the last 2 and there's a good reason for that because with out change any model car will die on the vine. The miata is dead on the vine until they decide to improve it A LOT!

The 2015 mustang is set to set a new record for mustang sales because it's a badass ****!

AGAIN, If Mazda is interested in selling sports cars they have to make improvements not build the same damn car over and over.

Why am I so passionate about the miata's fail is because I want it to succeed to leverage the production of another RX7. As it is it's a FAIL and there won't be another RX7. AGAIN IDIOTS!!!!

The market is there for a light weight cheap fun sports car and the miata isn't it. Today ENTHUSIAST expect a hell of lot more from a car than the current miata is providing.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 11:00 AM
  #14  
Halfbridge's Avatar
Brap Brap Brap
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 1
From: Dublin, OH
Originally Posted by gmonsen
I don't think that's entirely right. The new Mustang anyway should attract motorheads. The 5 liter motor makes 435 hp. It now has good independent rear suspension and seems to handle well. I simply can't get over the weight at 3500+ pounds. But not a bad car at all it seems in current incarnation.

G
Oh I definitely see your point (and agree), but as far as numbers are concerned, the V6 Mustang has eclipsed the GTs for years. I typically see these driven by females, teens, and people who want a "Mustang" without having a Mustang. If I didn't have so many other toys, I'd probably DD a new GT for sure.

Unrelated side note: I stole your signature format. It seems to work well for those of us with more toys than we should admit we have Love your bike collection, though
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 11:01 AM
  #15  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by Halfbridge
Oh I definitely see your point (and agree), but as far as numbers are concerned, the V6 Mustang has eclipsed the GTs for years. I typically see these driven by females, teens, and people who want a "Mustang" without having a Mustang. If I didn't have so many other toys, I'd probably DD a new GT for sure.

Unrelated side note: I stole your signature format. It seems to work well for those of us with more toys than we should admit we have Love your bike collection, though
I typically see old ladies, old men and girls driving miata's

Many more GT mustangs sell than miata's

Admit it. The current miata is a joke.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 11:11 AM
  #16  
Halfbridge's Avatar
Brap Brap Brap
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 1
From: Dublin, OH
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
I typically see old ladies, old men and girls driving miata's

Many more GT mustangs sell than miata's

Admit it. The current miata is a joke.
There's a reason I bought an AP2 S2000

I have yet to drive the new Miata, but my brother has a tastefully modified NA Miata. He just drove the '16 Miata this past weekend and was not impressed. He said it was completely lifeless in comparison to the NA. I asked him if he was actually surprised
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 11:15 AM
  #17  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by Halfbridge
There's a reason I bought an AP2 S2000

I have yet to drive the new Miata, but my brother has a tastefully modified NA Miata. He just drove the '16 Miata this past weekend and was not impressed. He said it was completely lifeless in comparison to the NA. I asked him if he was actually surprised
YEP

Agree 1000%

The only miata worth owning is the NA. With a hard top and some mods it's also super cool and still competitive at your local autox.

What flips my wig is all the car mags will praise the sh#t out of the this new miata. UNBELIEVABLE. I don't even need to drive it. I can go to the local go cart track and have more fun.

Last edited by Fritz Flynn; Aug 17, 2015 at 11:18 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 11:53 AM
  #18  
Natey's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 1,484
From: West Coast
Ford sells a **** ton of Mustangs to places like Hertz and Avis. You can't rent a Mazda or I bet those numbers would be at least a little different.

Go to any tourist trap town and watch the endless brand new convertible Mustangs go by with their weird headlights and lost drivers.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 12:51 PM
  #19  
wstrohm's Avatar
Recovering Miataholic
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 50
From: Fountain Valley, CA
Mazda again blew it. You can't keep making the exact same car for 25 years and expect a different result.
Why would Mazda want a different result? They have sold over 900,000 Miatas. The ND is in some ways a throwback to the NA (one of which, a 1990 model, I owned for over 18 years). The 2.0 liter car weighs 2330 lbs. HP is unremarkable, but the new drivers of this car seem very happy with it. If I had a three-car garage I would buy the Sport (base car) when it shows up here. If wife ever sells her FD, guess what will replace it?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 12:56 PM
  #20  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
i predict another 20 pager'
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 01:57 PM
  #21  
evo_koa's Avatar
Martin S.
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 123
From: Huntsville, Al
I work at a Ford dealership and we sell the new 5.0s like crazy! The whole car is just nice. From the interior to the independent suspension. Ill let yall know how the new gt350r drives after I go drive it
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 02:51 PM
  #22  
Halfbridge's Avatar
Brap Brap Brap
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 1
From: Dublin, OH
Originally Posted by gmonsen
I totally agree. There is something wrong with anyone who is not floored by the GT Mustang's motor. Seriously, 8,000 rpm in a Ford V8.



I hear you on the Mustang thing. My neighbor bought a new 1964 1/2 Mustang convertible and I bought my Shelby in 1966. She wanted to look cool in the parking lot and I wanted to go as fast as was possible. (Check out my newest bike in my sig...)

G
Not going to lie--I had to Google it. I am usually fairly keen on older bikes, but that was the first I had ever heard of one. VERY cool. I'd love to see your collection.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 03:17 PM
  #23  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by wstrohm
Why would Mazda want a different result? They have sold over 900,000 Miatas. The ND is in some ways a throwback to the NA (one of which, a 1990 model, I owned for over 18 years). The 2.0 liter car weighs 2330 lbs. HP is unremarkable, but the new drivers of this car seem very happy with it. If I had a three-car garage I would buy the Sport (base car) when it shows up here. If wife ever sells her FD, guess what will replace it?
Cool there's a car for everyone.

With that said most enthusiast or sports car buyers do not prefer the miata or it would sell 30 or 40k units plus a year like it did in 1990/91

In other words the people that want a 2300 pound car making 140 HP already own it.

The rest of us have moved on from 1990 car performance with the exception of those 10k people that might buy the all new miata because they along the mag editors can't get enough of the wonderful Miata even though it hasn't changed in 25 years.

.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 03:36 PM
  #24  
Halfbridge's Avatar
Brap Brap Brap
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 1
From: Dublin, OH
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
The rest of us have moved on from 1990 car performance with the exception of those 10k people that might buy the all new miata because they along the mag editors can't get enough of the wonderful Miata even though it hasn't changed in 25 years.

.
So cruel
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 07:54 PM
  #25  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by gmonsen
The original Miata was a reasonably good, sanitized Lotus Elan. It even looks like an Elan. Its simple and light and a 4 banger. It doesn't handle as well as any Elan, but otherwise very similar, since they unashamedly copied it. Thing is that an Elan weighs 1500 pounds versus the initial Miata's weight of 2100 pounds. Chapman had it right. The problem is the crap the government makes them add to a car. There must be a way to get back to these lightweight cars. Anyone who has ever driven early sports cars from the 60's knows how fun they are because they are so elemental. They are so light. Tiny. Think about how big the Mustang is at 3500 pounds+. The original Mustang weighed 2500 pounds and was substantially smaller physically than the new Mustangs. Weight and size are the problem with all the Federal legislation.

G
Yep the original one is the one to own and there are still plenty out there at a reasonable cost

No doubt fed regs make it difficult to make a light weight car but a mustang that weighs 3500 pounds and has 500 HP isn't really that heavy all things considered. Also more and more aluminum and other materials are used which also offsets that fed thing. The way both ford and chevy are paying attention to the enthusiast market is cool. I just wish Mazda would get on board.

Even the P1 is 3000 pounds

HP adds weight; Eng/trans/diff, chassis/braces, wheels/brakes etc....
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM.