3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Estimate my rwhp with this setup!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-05, 02:34 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
rx74ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Estimate my rwhp with this setup!

Please feel free to drop a line and estimate my rwhp.
I'm getting tuned by Steve in a couple of weeks and like to see where I'm headed.
to be frank I'm squeezing all I can out of my stock engine.

STOCK engine (42k)
XS Engineering T04E Turbo kit
Blitz SBC ID Boost controller
Apex FMIC
PFC
3" mid pipe (no catalytic converter)
Tanabe Racing Medalion Exhaust
550cc x 1300cc
Supra TT fuel pump
HKS Twin Power
HKS Spark Plugs (10s)
Old 09-25-05, 02:37 PM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
1sicsol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To4e is the small one?Pump gas 16 psi 375.
Three weekends untill it blows up.

Last edited by 1sicsol; 09-25-05 at 02:39 PM.
Old 09-25-05, 03:09 PM
  #3  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
rx74ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1sicsol
To4e is the small one?Pump gas 16 psi 375.
Three weekends untill it blows up.
yes, its the small one and its good for up to 18psi, but I will not boost it that high.
so you are saying 16 psi is too much for stock engine? I agree with you. I will NOT go past 14.5/15 psi.

-ray
Old 09-25-05, 04:04 PM
  #4  
development

 
dubulup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by
1sicsol To4e is the small one?Pump gas 16 psi 375.
Three weekends untill it blows up.
not sure how this joker fucked up his motor...but I agree with one of his statements.

Originally Posted by rx74ray
so you are saying 16 psi is too much for stock engine? I agree with you. I will NOT go past 14.5/15 psi.

-ray
you're easy to convince...
Old 09-25-05, 05:13 PM
  #5  
20BFD

 
black93RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
330rwhp @15 psi

I dont think 16psi is too much for a stock engine, it all depends on the tuning. Do you have a wide band, egt, boost, oil and water gauge?

IMO it is vital to know what is going on with your motor at all times.

I run all the mentioned above plus oil temp and oil pressure.

ps: the stock gauges suck, don't trust them!
Old 09-25-05, 05:42 PM
  #6  
Tony Stewart Killer.

iTrader: (12)
 
Snook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
dubulup is right as usual. There's absolutely nothing wrong with running high boost on the stock engine. In fact, you are in a great position to have a stock engine that nobody has tampered with. That engine with so little miles is solid and your car may never run as good after someone rebuilds it...depends on who does it.

I also agree with black93 that the dyno numbers will be lower than what the first guy posted. There's no way you will make 375rwhp at 16psi, maybe at 18
A better estimate is 350@15psi

My old car made 380rwhp at 15.5psi on the stock engine with 47k miles but it was with a T-66 about the size of a to4r I believe
Old 09-25-05, 05:54 PM
  #7  
The bomb is in the toy!1!

iTrader: (4)
 
cloud9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dallas Tx.
Posts: 2,179
Received 265 Likes on 154 Posts
don't listen to any of us, find out for yourself
Old 09-25-05, 06:16 PM
  #8  
I brake boost

 
FD Rey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cloud9
don't listen to any of us, find out for yourself
He will when he gets tuned in a couple of weeks. I guess he is just curious and what his expectations should be.

I say about 350rwhp and 290ft/lbs of torque.
Old 09-25-05, 06:21 PM
  #9  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
njstreetrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: new jersey
Posts: 2,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn 350 on a single turbos is low as hell...my friend made that on stock twins 15psi

Last edited by njstreetrx7; 09-25-05 at 06:30 PM. Reason: add
Old 09-25-05, 06:27 PM
  #10  
I brake boost

 
FD Rey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by njstreetrx7
damn 350 on a single turbos is low as hell
Well the reason for my guess is because it will probably have a conservative tune. Stock ports, and that turbo set up should be right around 350-375ish. It all depends on how aggressive you want to go with the tune.
Old 09-25-05, 06:32 PM
  #11  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
njstreetrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: new jersey
Posts: 2,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
o i c cause my friend made that on stock twins and port..... he even made 310 b4 my tuner tuned it.!!!!
Old 09-25-05, 06:42 PM
  #12  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
rx74ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes, as far as gauges I got Defi: Boost, EGT, Water, AFR.

sounds tempting. When I hit over 350 I'll be happy. I should post the dyno when its done.

-ray
Old 09-25-05, 06:45 PM
  #13  
Full Member

 
dead7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: fremont, ca
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seeing how Ray is in San Jose the best octane he's gonna do is probably 91 (there is 100 but its just expensive as heck) so it seems its going to be on par with what people make at 91. He's also getting away from any problems with a sequential system that he might run into. I think its a good idea, if he gets great at driving his car he can run some 100 octane at the track and put down more power. Although I might be biased because I had that turbo too. Just seems like the best turbo for CA daily driveability.

Neil
Old 09-26-05, 01:37 AM
  #14  
Full Member

 
rx_playa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
345rwhp@17 psi?
Old 11-04-05, 01:00 PM
  #15  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
rx74ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
boost ctler issues limited me to 13.5 psi. still made 340 whp. I'm fixing it and will retune at 15.

-ray
Old 11-04-05, 06:52 PM
  #16  
silver ghost

iTrader: (11)
 
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home of the Rolex 24
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Sounds about right w/ stock ported motor. About the same as stock twins at 15-16psi. I believe you would have a better AFR ratio w/ the single though( at the same horsepower). I have a very safe tune and am putting down 365 w/ a ported motor/ stock twins. A good street ported motor will yield another 30.
Old 11-04-05, 09:01 PM
  #17  
rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)
 
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The engine milage is low but those water seals are 13 years old.
Old 11-08-05, 04:37 PM
  #18  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
rx74ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
The engine milage is low but those water seals are 13 years old.

yes, I'm hoping to get 15 - 20 K miles out of it on the street.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
10-08-15 10:09 PM
Wicked93gs
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
42
10-07-15 11:58 PM
killerrx710
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
09-28-15 09:13 AM
killerrx710
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
09-24-15 10:57 PM



Quick Reply: Estimate my rwhp with this setup!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.