Engineering a better harness bar (warning: long…)
#26
Urban Combat Vet
iTrader: (16)
Not necessary.
Build it....please. I really don't want to install a rollbar which IMHO would be overkill for AX. But I need something solid for a harness that's still compatible with divider and cargo cover when reinstalled after an event. Given that the M2 version is no longer available (AFAIK), I think you might be surprised by the interest if you can keep it at or below $300.
Build it....please. I really don't want to install a rollbar which IMHO would be overkill for AX. But I need something solid for a harness that's still compatible with divider and cargo cover when reinstalled after an event. Given that the M2 version is no longer available (AFAIK), I think you might be surprised by the interest if you can keep it at or below $300.
#27
-
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If its anywhere near as cheap as youre predicting then Im in. Would be nice to have a matching front piece as well. Ive always wanted a way to mount a harness without having a full roll cage but I completely agree with your analysis of the existing products so I was never willing to trust them.
#28
Place your ad here...
Thread Starter
Build it....please. I really don't want to install a rollbar which IMHO would be overkill for AX. But I need something solid for a harness that's still compatible with divider and cargo cover when reinstalled after an event. Given that the M2 version is no longer available (AFAIK), I think you might be surprised by the interest if you can keep it at or below $300.
-Rob
#29
Team Benjos Captain
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Saxyman, shoot me a PM when you have everything ironed out with the design. Labor down here is a lot lower and I have a few friends in the business that might be able to help, I'm fairly positive we could get it down into the $200-$250 range.
#30
Place your ad here...
Thread Starter
If its anywhere near as cheap as youre predicting then Im in. Would be nice to have a matching front piece as well. Ive always wanted a way to mount a harness without having a full roll cage but I completely agree with your analysis of the existing products so I was never willing to trust them.
Also glad to know people would be interested in a matching front bar.
Thanks for the support!
-Rob
#32
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Detroit
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First---just wanted to say nice work. It's always great to see people actually applying engineering knowledge to their passion (limiting design by trial & error). This is exactly what I'm looking for since I don't want a full roll cage on my street car, but it would be nice to have something for HPDE's and AutoX (like you, everything else I've come across looks poorly designed). I had a few questions though:
1) Does the slot in the cross bar (at each end) go all the way through?
2) What type of aluminum are you considering & what material properties did you assume for your FE analysis?
3) Would you mind sharing your boundary conditions, the Von Mises stress plots on the eye bolts/bar assembly under load, and also the first Eigenmode/freq. of the assembly?
-Ken
#33
Place your ad here...
Thread Starter
First---just wanted to say nice work. It's always great to see people actually applying engineering knowledge to their passion (limiting design by trial & error). This is exactly what I'm looking for since I don't want a full roll cage on my street car, but it would be nice to have something for HPDE's and AutoX (like you, everything else I've come across looks poorly designed). I had a few questions though:
1) Does the slot in the cross bar (at each end) go all the way through?
2) What type of aluminum are you considering & what material properties did you assume for your FE analysis?
3) Would you mind sharing your boundary conditions, the Von Mises stress plots on the eye bolts/bar assembly under load, and also the first Eigenmode/freq. of the assembly?
-Ken
1) Yep, slots go through the bar
2) Prototype will be constructed from 6061 in a T6 temper (all components). Most analysis was performed with this aluminum in mind, and stresses stay below the yield strength by an acceptable amount. I might use 7075-T6 for the central bar (if cost doesn't skyrocket out of control) simply to increase the SF. Mounting brackets will remain 6061-T6. Assumptions made in most FEA analyses were with a modulus of 1e7, and poisson's of 0.33.
3) I don't mind posting some of that information to give you an idea. The fringe plots in the initial post are actually Mises stress plots. However, I've probably done close to 100 different analyses, all with slightly varying assumptions and BCs. Also, please understand that I am extremely hesitant to post detailed information and specs simply for proprietary reasons. When I get a chance, I'll re-run some of the analyses and post some pictures/information.
-Rob
#34
Certified Rotorhead
iTrader: (1)
Get a real harnessbar and attach it to that. Dont be stupid.
#35
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Detroit
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No problem Rob---I understand your concern with sharing the info. As far as the stress plots---there was no scale on them, and I was also curious how the eye bolts affected the analysis. The eigenmode/freq. question was related to me wanting to put a camera mount on there....didn't want the first mode of the bar assembly right on top of a chassis mode....
-Ken
-Ken
#36
Perpetual Project
iTrader: (4)
I was originally debating between polished and black anodized. But now you have me seriously considering a brushed finished..... hmmmm.
If nothing else, I hope to design a front bar that at least matches the rear one cosmetically. I didn't really plan on doing a multi-point for the front, but that is something that I may consider. I'll look into it.
As far as a targeted price-point:
At this exact moment, I am not sure if this will ever see full production. I suppose it depends on testing results for the prototype, and if there is enough interest to warrant small production runs (READ: if you would be interested in this bar then LET ME KNOW. The more seriously interested people that I know are out there, the more likely I'll be to actually manufacture).
If the bar does make it to production, then I am hoping for a selling point at or right around $300. Don't quote me on that though, as actual production and material cost may cause that figure to fluctuate wildly. But that is what I would be shooting for.
-Rob
If nothing else, I hope to design a front bar that at least matches the rear one cosmetically. I didn't really plan on doing a multi-point for the front, but that is something that I may consider. I'll look into it.
As far as a targeted price-point:
At this exact moment, I am not sure if this will ever see full production. I suppose it depends on testing results for the prototype, and if there is enough interest to warrant small production runs (READ: if you would be interested in this bar then LET ME KNOW. The more seriously interested people that I know are out there, the more likely I'll be to actually manufacture).
If the bar does make it to production, then I am hoping for a selling point at or right around $300. Don't quote me on that though, as actual production and material cost may cause that figure to fluctuate wildly. But that is what I would be shooting for.
-Rob
If you do decide to provide a multi-point option, it could be just that, an option. I'd guess it wouldn't be too hard to engineer some extra mounting points to a 'regular' two point bar, at not too much additional cost. Cusco offers a triangulation option for it's rear bars (last pic):
http://cusco.co.jp/english/e_strut.html
Speaking of which, could a similar option be available for the rear (assuming it really does offer a benefit)?
As far as cost, the $300 range is reasonable given the engineering you've evidently put into, not to mention the pure sexiness of CNC parts. I've been inquiring about ordering the Autoexe set (front and rear), which looks like is going to be about $700 to my door.
Hurry up and build it.
#37
Team Benjos Captain
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I hope you know that if you have a 55mph+ collision, your shoulders are going to break and be forced into your chest collapsing your lungs and punchuring your heart.. and possible paralyzation of the stress and breaking of your spine if your not already dead from the shoulder situation i described in my previous sentence.
Get a real harnessbar and attach it to that. Dont be stupid.
Get a real harnessbar and attach it to that. Dont be stupid.
#38
Place your ad here...
Thread Starter
No problem Rob---I understand your concern with sharing the info. As far as the stress plots---there was no scale on them, and I was also curious how the eye bolts affected the analysis. The eigenmode/freq. question was related to me wanting to put a camera mount on there....didn't want the first mode of the bar assembly right on top of a chassis mode....
-Ken
-Ken
hmmm... you're right, there was no scale on the fringe plots. I think those pictures were taken at an earlier stage when I was toying with different mesh configurations. I didn't usually have the scale visible.
Also, there are no eye-bolts in my design. I use a drop-through quick release pin. The load is centrally mounted, and the analysis is virtually unaffected by them.
Excellent thought about the eigenmode analysis with regards to a camera mount!! I'm sure that the bar doubling as a camera mount would be fairly common for track go'ers. I'll do a little more analysis in this area to see where I'm at (and possibly adapt the design accordingly). Stay tuned....
-Rob
#39
Place your ad here...
Thread Starter
Cusco offers a triangulation option for it's rear bars (last pic):
http://cusco.co.jp/english/e_strut.html
Speaking of which, could a similar option be available for the rear (assuming it really does offer a benefit)?
http://cusco.co.jp/english/e_strut.html
Speaking of which, could a similar option be available for the rear (assuming it really does offer a benefit)?
Hurry up and build it.
-Rob
#40
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (8)
As always, a wonderfully thought out product.
I do have the full "Race Shop" roll-bar with diagonals on the main hoop and rear support diagonal. The roll bar also has an additional horizontal harness hoop, and seat back-brace.
I personally have my harness looped around the Race Shop horizontal bar between the rear-strut towers bypassing the use of eye-bolts.
Too bad this can't be made to replace my Race-shop horizontal rear-strut bar.
:-) neil
Basically the same config (mine has the seat brace, harness bar, and a different (not M2) strut-brace), unfortunately, not the same car!
I do have the full "Race Shop" roll-bar with diagonals on the main hoop and rear support diagonal. The roll bar also has an additional horizontal harness hoop, and seat back-brace.
I personally have my harness looped around the Race Shop horizontal bar between the rear-strut towers bypassing the use of eye-bolts.
Too bad this can't be made to replace my Race-shop horizontal rear-strut bar.
:-) neil
Basically the same config (mine has the seat brace, harness bar, and a different (not M2) strut-brace), unfortunately, not the same car!
Last edited by M104-AMG; 05-29-07 at 09:43 PM.
#41
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Detroit
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good god I'm retarded---I see what you did. Never mind my question. The assembly should be stiff enough to put the frequency well above 100 Hz, but I've seen results in the past where a long bar like that can be down around 20-30 Hz if not stiff enough....
Keep up the good work, and let me know when I can buy one!
#42
Certified Rotorhead
iTrader: (1)
How would that situation happen? His mounting points are above and behind him, therefore there's no compression of the spinal column. It's only when the mounting points are lower than your shoulders, and the more so the worse, that you get the compression that's so dangerous.
Am i missing somthing?
#43
Team Benjos Captain
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I was thinking he has the harnesses up and at an angle to where the belts come out of the b-pillar in the back (if that's where they go, can't say I've really ever looked for where they come from). If he does have them go down the back of the seat and then bolt into the bottom, then you're definitely right, he'll get his spine crushed.
#44
Certified Rotorhead
iTrader: (1)
Unless he has JDM backseats (which supply the mounting points) i dont see how its possible to mount it the way he described. You wont be able to mount the harness of OEM seatbelt mounting point on the b-pillar because that will only supply one mounting point... so wheres he going to mount the other harness strap?
But yea.. i was just trying to make a point.... ive personally seen alot of injuries and fatalies because of incorrectly installed saftey system (whether it be seats, seatbelts, harnesses, airbags, etc.)... so, just lookin out.
Even though theres countless hours and effort going into the engineering and contruction of the saftey equipment, it all still depends on the user...... unfortunatly saftey systems are desgined to work in ideal situations but also acomdate as much as possible to a situation other than the ideal (incorrect mounting and such of the equipment or position of the person/object and such) in an impact.
But yea.. i was just trying to make a point.... ive personally seen alot of injuries and fatalies because of incorrectly installed saftey system (whether it be seats, seatbelts, harnesses, airbags, etc.)... so, just lookin out.
Even though theres countless hours and effort going into the engineering and contruction of the saftey equipment, it all still depends on the user...... unfortunatly saftey systems are desgined to work in ideal situations but also acomdate as much as possible to a situation other than the ideal (incorrect mounting and such of the equipment or position of the person/object and such) in an impact.
#45
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So theres no way to make it work with the cargo divider? My amp is mounted to mine and taking it out is a real pain. I just started looking into a harness but it looks like this may be the one I want.
#47
Place your ad here...
Thread Starter
The better option is to go directly through the centerline of the bar. Unfortunately, this requires that the divider be removed. I suppose as an alternative, you could cut some slots through the plastic divider, so that the shoulder harnesses go through it...
Also, I'm in agreement with dclin. I wouldn't personally mount anything of substance directly to that plastic divider...
-Rob
#48
Unless he has JDM backseats (which supply the mounting points) i dont see how its possible to mount it the way he described. You wont be able to mount the harness of OEM seatbelt mounting point on the b-pillar because that will only supply one mounting point... so wheres he going to mount the other harness strap?
But yea.. i was just trying to make a point.... ive personally seen alot of injuries and fatalies because of incorrectly installed saftey system (whether it be seats, seatbelts, harnesses, airbags, etc.)... so, just lookin out.
Even though theres countless hours and effort going into the engineering and contruction of the saftey equipment, it all still depends on the user...... unfortunatly saftey systems are desgined to work in ideal situations but also acomdate as much as possible to a situation other than the ideal (incorrect mounting and such of the equipment or position of the person/object and such) in an impact.
But yea.. i was just trying to make a point.... ive personally seen alot of injuries and fatalies because of incorrectly installed saftey system (whether it be seats, seatbelts, harnesses, airbags, etc.)... so, just lookin out.
Even though theres countless hours and effort going into the engineering and contruction of the saftey equipment, it all still depends on the user...... unfortunatly saftey systems are desgined to work in ideal situations but also acomdate as much as possible to a situation other than the ideal (incorrect mounting and such of the equipment or position of the person/object and such) in an impact.
I was told as long as the belts are at least 45 degrees from vertical under tension id be fine. (apparently this is a regulation in some US race series?) Currently the two shoulder straps mount onto the lower seat belt mounting points for the rear seats in a JDM car - which is about kidney height at 2 feet behind me.
Ill get some pictures and see what you think, i want to be safe. From what i was told this would be ok, but we will see. I do see how some spinal compression would certainly occur in this configuration, but i wouldnt imagine itd be a lot. But as i say, proof in the pictures. Ill start a new thread as to not hijack this one.
And saxyman, i'd definately be interested in this product $300.