3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Deleting Primary Rail?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-10, 09:42 PM
  #1  
Will u do me a kindness?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
the_glass_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Parlor City, NY
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Deleting Primary Rail?

Any input or opinions from anyone who has or who have looked into deleting the primary fuel rail with a Ground Zero/Xcessive Lower Intake Manifold and fuel rail with four injectors?

Any idle or staging issues?

Pictures if you got them would be great.
Old 05-26-10, 10:13 PM
  #2  
~17 MPG

iTrader: (2)
 
scotty305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 3,292
Received 226 Likes on 152 Posts
I've done it, using 4x ID1000 injectors in the Xcessive LIM. I used the Racing Beat injector plugs: they're designed for the earlier cars but you can trim them down a couple of inches to the correct length (diameter and o-ring pattern fits the FD center housing).

Posted one or two photos in another thread: https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-rx-7s-23/picture-request-injector-dynamics-installed-870484/

Posted more photos on another rotary forum, can dig up a few more if you want to see anything in particular.

No staging issues, but I'm running an AEM EMS and if you have something else that may be an apples vs oranges comparison.

Idle quality is not the same as with the stock primary injectors; seems like it needs to be richer and even then it occasionally stumbles, this could be the fault of the not-very-experienced tuner (me) also. Throttle response at low RPM (below 2500) seems a bit poorer as well. From what I'm told this is because of the injector location, I hear that others have gotten the ID1000's to idle nicely when in the OEM primary spot (haven't tried myself though).


Advantage is the fuel lines are very simple, and all the injectors are the same if I ever feel the need to keep spares on hand or swap them around for troubleshooting purposes. I mostly wanted to see if it could work. For a dedicated race car I think it would be fine.


From doing more research after the install, I've been told that the stock (and Xcessive) mounting locations are not ideal... I hear it would be better to locate primary injectors at the outside of a bend so they can point directly into the port rather than spraying at the outside of the bend. This might not be very feasible, since it may require mounting injectors near the exhaust manifold and/or turbo(s).
Old 05-28-10, 01:48 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast


iTrader: (5)
 
Net Seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,470
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by the_glass_man
Any input or opinions from anyone who has or who have looked into deleting the primary fuel rail with a Ground Zero/Xcessive Lower Intake Manifold and fuel rail with four injectors?

Any idle or staging issues?

Pictures if you got them would be great.
I actually have e-mailed them before and asked if that is what the four injector holes are made for. They told me that the additional two holes are made for additional fuel injectors, and not to replace the primary fuel rail.
Old 05-28-10, 07:36 PM
  #4  
Registered User

iTrader: (4)
 
justturbo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: new york
Posts: 1,571
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good info
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
Blk 93
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
7
09-28-15 01:45 PM
lnlreaper
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
09-27-15 09:59 AM
connerfd3s
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
09-19-15 05:58 PM



Quick Reply: Deleting Primary Rail?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM.