3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Confirm 1993-1995 USA spring rates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 06:11 PM
  #1  
M104-AMG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 6
From: FL
Confirm 1993-1995 USA spring rates

After checking the archives, the general consensus seems to be that the 1993-1995 USA FD had a spring rate of: 280F/200R

However, while looking at some Racing Beat springs, they list their springs as being 7% GREATER than stock, but with values of: 260F/212R

That would make the stock FD spring rate: 243F/198R per Racing Beat.

Can anyone confirm 1st hand (no hearsay) either through Mazda documentation, or a documented spring test ?

In short, I'm trying to calculate the Front/Rear spring ratio, and based upon these two descrepencies it's either a ratio of 1.40 or 1.23 .

TIA,
:-) neil
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 06:17 PM
  #2  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Racing Beat's numbers are wrong. https://www.rx7club.com/suspension-wheels-tires-brakes-20/spring-rates-600982/
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #3  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
I believe that the 93 springs are slightly stiffer, and slightly shorter than the 94/95 springs. The suspension was softened a bit after 93. If you compare the part numbers, you will find that they are different.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #4  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
i tested 30 FD springs on my Longacre Digital spring checker. the average was 263 front and 195 rear w very little variation. i believe Mahjik posted shop manual figures of 265 and 195.

howard coleman
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 07:58 PM
  #5  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
From my post in the suspension section:

Originally Posted by adam c
After seeing Damon's post, I decided to look at my 94 FSM. I don't know where Damon found the spring rates. I looked at the suspension specs, and didn't see anything. Perhaps it isn't listed in the 94 FSM.

I did find something very surprising!!! On page R4 (suspension specs), it lists 2 different front coil springs. One has a wire diameter of 12.3mm . The other has a wire diameter of 12.5mm. Free lengths of the coils are also different. 270.0mm & 276.3mm. The rear springs seem to be the same for all cars. It appears that the R2 got the longer springs with thicker wire. This would account for a variation in spring rates on different cars. It looks like the 94 R2's didn't just get stiffer shocks.

If anyone doubts this, there is a 94 FSM that has been downloaded in the 3rd gen section.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 12:26 PM
  #6  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Since I was curious about this, I called Ray Crowe (Malloy Mazda) to check.

He said that there are 2 different part numbers for front 94 springs:

#FD 01 34011 for the R2 $86.38 each
#FD 17 34011 for the other models $103.13 each

He didn't have spring the rates for either spring. Who says all springs are created equal?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SakeBomb Garage
SakeBomb Garage
9
May 11, 2020 10:04 AM
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
5
Aug 9, 2018 05:54 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
Captain Hook
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
8
Sep 22, 2015 01:12 PM
vxturboxv
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Sep 16, 2015 04:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.