3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Which clutch arm is the better one?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 05:11 PM
  #1  
ncaudio's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh NC
NC Which clutch arm is the better one?

I did some searching and did not find the answer to this, Mazda made (at least) a coulple different FD clutch throwout bearing arms, I have both aluminum and steel ones. Which type is better and why? Thanks in advance
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 08:46 PM
  #2  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
I don't think they made an AL one for FDs.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 09:44 PM
  #3  
ncaudio's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh NC
Originally Posted by turbojeff
I don't think they made an AL one for FDs.
Jeff, you could be right, I checked 2 transmissions in storage and they both have what look like cast aluminum pieces, but a magnet sticks, so are probably forged steel. I got a formed steel arm in a collection of what was supposed to be only FD parts and thought I read they had made 2 different arms, but guess I was mistaken, thanks
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 10:58 PM
  #4  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,724
From: Pensacola, FL
Supposedly the part was updated at some point, with better metal or something.

The part number is n315-16-520b - the "B" at the end means the part was revised, first no letter, then A, then B. But, looking at the fork, you'd probably never be able to tell if it's the revision or not.

All the forks will be cast iron, never seen a cast aluminum one and I don't think it could hold up to the stress.

Dale
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 11:31 PM
  #5  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
The pressed steel part is probably from a FC. I would buy a new one just to be sure, they are less than $100 IIRC.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2012 | 12:08 AM
  #6  
Farkel's Avatar
A N T I H E R O
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 1
From: B̷͈͇̠̗͔̼̝̓̎͛͂A̧̡̠̩̭̹̼̭͔̎̃̈́̍͂ͬͬ̚Y̯̜ͨ̒̾̽͊͘ ͈͙̰
I read that the revised clutch arm was incorporated in '94... if I have a '94 car, would it be safe to assume that it has the stronger clutch arm? Or was this a mid-year implementation?

I'm doing a clutch job soon and would like to save $100 if possible, but at the same time I don't want to risk it if I'm not sure.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2012 | 09:59 AM
  #7  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,724
From: Pensacola, FL
Having the forks break is pretty uncommon, really. But, if you're putting a heavier pressure plate in, I'd do it. If you're going for a pressure plate that isn't heavy, you should be OK.

Dale
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2012 | 12:49 PM
  #8  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
Mine broke last yr, I say do it.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2012 | 12:58 PM
  #9  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
i doubt the revision is dramatic. problem is just fatigue over the years so if you are installing a heavy duty PP it isn't a bad idea to replace it with the revised part.

i have never noticed any difference in any of the throwout arms.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MattGold
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
Sep 9, 2015 02:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM.