3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

bypassing TB "coolant"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #1  
BenjiRX-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: Monteral, QC
bypassing TB "coolant"

it's probably been discussed before but ayways. as far as I know, the coolant line through the throttle body is used to keep the butterfly from freezing in winter. So it's actually a throttle body heater.

Is it just me or raising the IAT isnt something that we want? assuming I only drive in summer so I could care less about butterflies freezing, would bypassing the TB help lower the intake air temp at all? it's a pretty cheap and easy mod
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 10:03 PM
  #2  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
http://www.rx7.org/Robinette/throttle_body_coolant.htm
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 10:14 PM
  #3  
moconnor's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 96
From: Bay Area, CA
Is there a more useless mod on a street car?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 07:09 AM
  #4  
wrankin's Avatar
Old Rotary Dog
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 2
From: Durham, NC
Not if you end up having to pull the throttle body or UIM off a few times - say to get to vac hoses, fuel injectors, or those annoying coils. It''s nice not having to worry about spilling coolant everywhere. On my next engine, I'm having those two nipples that feed the line removed and capped.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 08:47 AM
  #5  
evot23's Avatar
Classy
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
bypass the coolant...better yet, remove the butterflies. Gains? minimal but it'll give you something to tinker on. On the lsx engines people do a TB coolant bypass mod too. Again, probably doesn't do a whole lot but I guess every little bit counts.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 09:00 AM
  #6  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
I remember a mechanic we used to have at Gotham telling me the Firebird/Camaro guys used to report gains of up to 5 rwhp by deleting the coolant through the TB.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 09:09 AM
  #7  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Time out.

When you remove the coolant hose, you disable the mechanical cold idle system! Think about that before you pull it out. I have actually reversed a TB coolant hose delete, I got so annoyed by the unstable idle and keeping my foot on the gas. Another minor issue is that if you ask somebody (family member, a carwash place, wherever) to start your car up they will have no idea what's going on if it stalls or runs rough.

Service highlights document page F-19:



One coolant hose isn't going to conduct a ton of heat into the intake charge. Heat has to conduct from the coolant to the hose and to the TB itself, and then from the TB metal to the intake air. Who detonates because of the factory coolant hose? I run that hose on my single turbo setup and a friend's stock twin setup with no knock or any other problem. And 5 hp? What are you driving, a Civic? You can gain 5 hp just from the ambient temperature dropping a few degrees. Check uncorrected dyno numbers on different days and you'll see what I mean.

Some of those other cars run a similar coolant hose to maintain a relatively fixed temperature to a drive-by-wire actuator (Rx-8 for example) or ISC valve (2nd gen Rx-7, which also has a mechanical fast idle system using TB coolant). These systems use the coolant to maintain longevity of those various air-related solenoid valves and for driveability in more extreme weather conditions. They often have stepper motors controlling idle air and deleting the TB hose doesn't make a difference, like on LSX engines that are not drive-by-wire.

Is one hose that big of a deal? Yeah it's annoying, but when you figure out the trick it's not so bad to remove/install.
Attached Thumbnails bypassing TB "coolant"-fd_thermowax.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 09:20 AM
  #8  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
When I cold start my FD, the idle sits right at 1000 rpm and isn't noticeably rougher than usual. Same thing for the customer cars that we delete the coolant thru the tb. I think it comes down to tuning, as well as having a fresh throttle cable and having all of the tb settings adjusted correctly.

I should say we delete it on most single turbo performance builds, for near stock cars or conservative/older owners we tend to leave the system as-is.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 09:27 AM
  #9  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
^ Are these cars retaining the ISC? What is their warm idle speed? I don't think it's a good idea for the OP to eliminate something when he doesn't even understand what it does.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 10:48 AM
  #10  
BenjiRX-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: Monteral, QC
Originally Posted by arghx
^ Are these cars retaining the ISC? What is their warm idle speed? I don't think it's a good idea for the OP to eliminate something when he doesn't even understand what it does.
it's not that I don't understand what it does, I'm just wondering if it has any benefit at all

thanks for the answers, I should hav checked robinette before asking
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 10:34 PM
  #11  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by arghx
^ Are these cars retaining the ISC? What is their warm idle speed? I don't think it's a good idea for the OP to eliminate something when he doesn't even understand what it does.
Yes, we retain ISC on all cars. That is one of the few things I don't like to delete . warm idle speed varies, typically with the street port they're anywhere from 900 to 1000.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 05:00 PM
  #12  
GoRacer's Avatar
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
I already have the fast idle cam removed. I want to do the coolant bypass. If I remove the warm up plunger, is some kind of bop needed to seal it off? Do you just cap off or the gold colored hose barb, or is there a way to actually remove it? What about down on the bock, is that just capped?

The big hole on the bottom left of the single place is for idle, correct? It looks like a passageway that continues on through the extension manifold.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 06:28 PM
  #13  
grimple1's Avatar
Turd Ferguson
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Sherman Oaks, California
I think typically people just run it back to the waterpump .. so it'll still come out the back of the block and will connect back up to the 90degree tube on the waterpump housing.

You don't need a BOP for the TB.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
Bauer778
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Nov 4, 2015 04:42 PM
Quillo555
Power FC Forum
20
Jan 18, 2003 03:17 AM
Keith
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Aug 9, 2001 02:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 PM.