Automatic's answer to a manual...
Originally Posted by Monkman33
OK.
We should go over a quick grammar lesson. If you wish to insult me, at least have the respect to use English correctly.
Here is what you should have typed:
You're gay you ****-noob.
There, was that so hard. Maybe next time you'll just not try at all.
We should go over a quick grammar lesson. If you wish to insult me, at least have the respect to use English correctly.
Here is what you should have typed:
You're gay you ****-noob.
There, was that so hard. Maybe next time you'll just not try at all.
Hey Monkman you made a puctuation error. It should say, "There, was that so hard?"
Sorry, just sharing the "love".
Originally Posted by Monkman33
What about the Audi dual clutch transmission? I think overlapping shifts are probably "technically" faster than conventional shifting. Since this would mean a shift time in the negatives... :P
The only exception would be when you are going from 2-4 or 4-6 or 1-3 or 3-5, since the gear sets are 1-3-5 on one side and 2-4-6 on the other.
Anywho, I'll shut up now.
BTW, I respect that you went a different route on your car, as long as you like it, that's ALL that matters.
The only exception would be when you are going from 2-4 or 4-6 or 1-3 or 3-5, since the gear sets are 1-3-5 on one side and 2-4-6 on the other.
Anywho, I'll shut up now.
BTW, I respect that you went a different route on your car, as long as you like it, that's ALL that matters.
so how well does that tranny work behind a torqueless rotary? also what all had to be done to fit it in there? the reason i ask is because i have on sitting in my garage that i was going to try and put behind my turbo IS300.
WoW awesome job and congrats on your "manual killer"... I would love it if you could share the work done, maybe a glimpse of the setup under the car? impression of the time it took to get the right setup?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



