3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

AST bypass replacement???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 06:47 PM
  #1  
pearlyellow's Avatar
Thread Starter
accepting donations
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
AST bypass replacement???

M2performance offers a ast bypass, is this a good idea or what? It's cheaper than bying a billet ast so someone let me know if this is a good idea or not? Thanks

Jeff
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #2  
Enconsiderate's Avatar
I am so smrt.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Torrance, CA
hey jeff,

for me... i would rather have the ast. i have heard that it causes no problems to rmove it, but i think mazda put it there for a reason. i don't know for sure if it would cause any problems down the line if you took it off. maybe you would have a hard time keeping air bubble out of your coolant sys.

best way to know for sure is to hope that someone who has had their ast removed answer this thread. if you do remove the ast let us know how it goes.

ian
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 07:24 PM
  #3  
7racer's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 10
From: Dallas, Texas
boy this has been debated back and forth.

FWIW you can buy the 2nd gen cap to do the bypass for much cheaper...

it's the 86-88 cap mazdatrix part number 15-1740-N326

http://www.mazdatrix.com/b8.htm

The RX-8 doesn't have one....but my mechanic believes in it. Who knows?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #4  
pearlyellow's Avatar
Thread Starter
accepting donations
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
well just looking for feedback, I'm a believer in "if it's there then it's probably got a purpose". Since there probably won't be any convincing arguement I think I"ll just get the billet ast.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 07:35 PM
  #5  
Scrapiron7's Avatar
STi Boxer power!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
I'd bet close to 50% of us don't use an AST. I didn't want another point of failure in the crappy cooling system, and it took some clutter out of the engine bay.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 07:56 PM
  #6  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
the cooling system plays a MAJOR role to prolong engine life, if the ast was put in there by mazda, it has a purpose, imo i wouldnt want to f*ck with that so i just bought a pettit ast and got rid of the stocker..
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 08:01 PM
  #7  
BigIslandSevens's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,531
Likes: 0
From: Denver, NC
The twin turbos were put in by mazda and we all have plenty of reasons to go single. Get rid of it. It will not hurt your engine.

Unlike when your ast craps out on you and drools your coolant all over the ground.
I just hate the argument that the mazda engineers knew all when they designed these cars. ...They f..ed up in ALOT of places. The cooling system is only 1 of them.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #8  
Benjamin's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
If the system is burped properly, then there's no issue. I'm running in the 400rw range, and misbehave daily. I've never seen a temp above 85c on the PFC. I've never heard any funny coolant noises. Ditch the damn thing. If Ray at Malloy advises it, it's good enough for me.

-BN
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2004 | 03:59 AM
  #9  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
I dont have AST since 97, and its running fine, never have problem with it.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2004 | 04:54 AM
  #10  
4CN Air's Avatar
DETH TRP
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan Beach, CA
what all is needed to bypass/remove it?


details about using the 2nd gen cap?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2004 | 02:02 PM
  #11  
KevinK2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 6
From: Delaware
Originally posted by 7racer
.....The RX-8 doesn't have one....but my mechanic believes in it. Who knows?
RX-8 has it ... the AST and overflow tank are combined into a pressurized expansion tank, high in the engine bay. most mfgs do this now. It has an added advantage of keeping system pressure up more consistently to avoid excessive local boiling.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
t-von
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
Sep 10, 2015 01:56 PM
BLK 93
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
Sep 9, 2015 10:56 AM
Frox
General Rotary Tech Support
2
Sep 8, 2015 08:36 AM
Enzo1944
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 6, 2015 08:57 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 AM.