3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

AFR for Fd?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 12:36 AM
  #1  
RLaoFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brappable not Unflappable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 8
From: Bay Area
AFR for Fd?

In my search into the depths of the forum for info on widebands, i came across a chart for recommended AFR's that supposedly was produced by Mazda? Can someone please show me where that is because i cant seem to find it anymore.

thanks
randy
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 02:00 AM
  #2  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
ive seen that pic in lots of places. its in english in the fd new model training book, and its in the cosmo book as well.

ive also seen it in the japanese rx7 magazine etc etc
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 02:43 AM
  #3  
twomucboost4u's Avatar
Always Under Construction
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,294
Likes: 24
From: San Jose
For A/F ratios I would say you should be right around 11.1......10.8 being the rich safe side....11.3 being the less safe lean side....

Chris
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 05:18 AM
  #4  
Azcamel's Avatar
Put it in her butt
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
11.3 is really safe already, wow i say 11.5-11.8 is safe, and 12.2 is the line that should not be crossed at WOT
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 07:29 AM
  #5  
RLaoFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brappable not Unflappable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 8
From: Bay Area
thanks for your input guys, but im looking for a specific chart that i can't seem to find.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #6  
twomucboost4u's Avatar
Always Under Construction
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,294
Likes: 24
From: San Jose
I thought 12.1 was perfect too, but I was told by a couple people that N/A applications should tune for 12.1 turbo applications should tune for 11.1. I ve seen a couple tuners tune for around 11.7 but havent seen any tune in the 12 for turbo.

Chris
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #7  
mdpalmer's Avatar
T O R Q U E!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1
From: far far away
Depends on your timing, gas in tank, boost pressure, air intake temps (and even fuel and water... a hot motor eats up some margin) too. If everything is perfect you can tune above 12:1, but from what I see most people with a reliable "street" car running high 10's to low 11's.

On the street, I run around 11:1 @ 13 psi on 91 octane with pretty safe timing. Regular abuse, hot and cold weather, and my motor still runs On the track (road course) I ran 10-11 psi around 10.5:1.

It's all about how much margin you want for detonation...

Last edited by mdpalmer; Jun 19, 2008 at 02:21 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 08:34 PM
  #8  
Dudemaaanownsanrx7's Avatar
wannaspeed.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 5
From: Texas
you can also taper it down.
the higher the boost level the richer you will want to be.
for instance in vacuum ranges i run close to 14.7 below 40- 45 MPH and close to 16 in vacuum above 40-45 mph.

then from 0 psi to about 5-6 psi i run right around 12. Above 6 psi i taper it from about 11.6 down to 11 at 15 psi.
above 16 psi is pig rich cause i dont plan to boost higher and want extra fuel in case it spikes.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #9  
RLaoFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brappable not Unflappable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 8
From: Bay Area
I found the chart, but its too big to post.

Mazda seems to have everything on the REALLY safe side. I've concluded that its unreliable.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 11:19 PM
  #10  
mdpalmer's Avatar
T O R Q U E!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1
From: far far away
Originally Posted by RLaoFD
I found the chart, but its too big to post.

Mazda seems to have everything on the REALLY safe side. I've concluded that its unreliable.
Can you email it to me? I can at least temporarily host it from my site PM me and I'll let you know what my email is.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 11:31 PM
  #11  
notveryhappyjack's Avatar
1 bar boost
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 5
From: Seattle, Washington
went wot in 5th and reached 9.5:1 once

car idles at 11.4:1

Usually boost af/r are around 10.5-11.0
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 01:29 AM
  #12  
moconnor's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 96
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by RLaoFD
I found the chart, but its too big to post.

Mazda seems to have everything on the REALLY safe side. I've concluded that its unreliable.
Mazda AFRs are as low as 10:1 if I recall. I can host this chart too.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 02:04 AM
  #13  
RLaoFD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brappable not Unflappable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 8
From: Bay Area
Originally Posted by moconnor
Mazda AFRs are as low as 10:1 if I recall. I can host this chart too.
yeah thats how low i remember. hopefully the chart will get hosted soon so you guys will see.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #14  
mdpalmer's Avatar
T O R Q U E!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1
From: far far away
AFR chart

attached.
Attached Thumbnails AFR for Fd?-mazda-target-afr-map_medqua.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 07:48 AM
  #15  
MILOS7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 762
Likes: 22
From: los angeles
Originally Posted by mdpalmer
attached.
very good to know...
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 05:07 AM
  #16  
MILOS7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 762
Likes: 22
From: los angeles
Originally Posted by mdpalmer
attached.

should i use this oem afr as target afr value for my pfc tune?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 08:11 AM
  #17  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
mdpalmer, where did you get those numbers from. That is super overkill for a stock setup. I don't think even the stock computer runs that rich.

thewird
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 11:19 AM
  #18  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Originally Posted by thewird
mdpalmer, where did you get those numbers from. That is super overkill for a stock setup. I don't think even the stock computer runs that rich.

thewird


It's looks a lot like the PFC base map, target lambda table (aka the INJ map) converted into AFR.

It is a 100% internet forum myth that FD's run exceptionally rich from the factory. They actually run leaner than many other turbo cars except at idle.

Take a look at these factory lambda tables from normal piston engines:

09 WRX



Z32 300zx twin turbo, disregard values in lower left because those are closed loop cells

Attached Thumbnails AFR for Fd?-sp32-20100325-121621.png  
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 11:24 AM
  #19  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Evo X



1st gen DSM



Z31 300zx turbo



SR20DET Power FC Djetro target AFR table



Again, if anything the FD runs LEAN relative to other cars.
Attached Thumbnails AFR for Fd?-sp32-20100325-122313.png   AFR for Fd?-sp32-20100325-122132.png   AFR for Fd?-sp32-20100325-122029.png   AFR for Fd?-sp32-20100325-122831.png  
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 12:26 AM
  #20  
BoostCrzy's Avatar
Doritos on a toothpick
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 5
From: west palm beach, FL
I run a mix with 1/3 C16 and 2/3 93....target AFR's with this gas are in the low 12's...12.2-12.4....18psi(precision 6776rsp)...car runs PERFECT.

...Idle is 12.5-12.8....cruise is 13.5-14.5....
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 12:33 AM
  #21  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
^ I've run 12 AFR before as well @ 18 PSi and it made good power even verified on the dyno. Then I took it to Mosport and the motor popped on the 4th lap down the back stretch but boy did it make good power for what it had until that 4th lap. Curious what timing your running with that type of fuel, AFR, and boost.

thewird
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:02 PM
  #22  
BoostCrzy's Avatar
Doritos on a toothpick
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 5
From: west palm beach, FL
Originally Posted by thewird
Curious what timing your running with that type of fuel, AFR, and boost.

thewird
15* with 9*split at redline....
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:05 PM
  #23  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Good stuff.

thewird
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #24  
mdpalmer's Avatar
T O R Q U E!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1
From: far far away
Originally Posted by MILOS7
should i use this oem afr as target afr value for my pfc tune?
Not necessarily From what I've seen I've tuned my car around 11.2 for ~10 psi, 11 for ~12, and ~10.8 for 14 psi. I have fluctuations about +/- 0.2 on those values... just started running 14.5 psi (1 bar) in the last couple months and the car is regularly beaten on the street /w stock turbos. Ambient temps anywhere from 40-80*F. No problems yet. My timing is pretty conservative and I use 91 pump gas and a good SMIC intercooler... May be rich and down on power, but at least my engine hasn't blown up

Originally Posted by thewird
mdpalmer, where did you get those numbers from. That is super overkill for a stock setup. I don't think even the stock computer runs that rich.

thewird
I got an email from someone a while ago... don't remember who. My email files are gone, so I can't dig it up, sorry

Originally Posted by arghx

Again, if anything the FD runs LEAN relative to other cars.
Raymond, thanks for posting that. Very interesting to see those maps!!!! How are you able to read the map files, or are these screenshots of the maps? One thing I question though: those are "target" values, not actual measured values. It would make a lot more sense if someone had wideband data from a stock car to draw the conclusion that X car runs richer than a stock FD. Just saying...
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 09:29 PM
  #25  
smog-guy707's Avatar
Wangan Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
good info... thanks
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.