3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

ABS should i removed or keep it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-05, 01:02 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
13bmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami Fl
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Smile ABS should i removed or keep it?

i have a 1993 fd and i am thinking in removed the complete ABS sistem for weight saving and more room in my engine
what you think guys of this, should i removed or keep it
af anyone has removed let me knowyour opinion
Old 08-24-05, 01:04 PM
  #2  
Eye In The Sky

iTrader: (2)
 
cewrx7r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,895
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
For street use, keep it.

For track use, dump it.
Old 08-24-05, 01:04 PM
  #3  
fart on a friends head!!!

 
rotorbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: sheppard AFB, TX
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
what are you doing with the car? is this some racers dream? or is this car an ACTUAL track machine? id say you may wanna keep it if your just wanting all the locals to think youre a supercool racecar driver, yo!!!
Old 08-24-05, 01:16 PM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (6)
 
7_rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,139
Received 37 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by rotorbrain
what are you doing with the car? is this some racers dream? or is this car an ACTUAL track machine? id say you may wanna keep it if your just wanting all the locals to think youre a supercool racecar driver, yo!!!
Old 08-24-05, 01:19 PM
  #5  
Living the dream...

iTrader: (7)
 
93silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cewrx7r1
For street use, keep it.

For track use, dump it.
Couldn't have said it better!
Old 08-24-05, 07:54 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
FLA94FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cewrx7r1
For street use, keep it.

For track use, dump it.
Is it prohibited on the track?

Your stopping time from 60 will jump 40'. The best drivers in world can't come close to the stoping power of ABS. Tracktion control is another matter the best drivers can best that system.
Old 08-24-05, 09:56 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
13bmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami Fl
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
whell the idea cross my mind because i am lightening the car i already have cf hood cf trunk and fiber glass fenders and someone told me that remove the ABS will save as much as 50 pounds,i dpont know wht else to remove,i know that removing the abs will deadly to brake times on the street

but just asking
Old 08-24-05, 10:06 PM
  #8  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Getting aftermarket seats will save you 50 lbs and not reduce safety. Eliminating the ABS to save the ~35 lbs on a non-track only car is just stupid IMO.
Old 08-24-05, 10:16 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
13bmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami Fl
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
already have aftermarket seat a pair of recaro and save a lot more than that but im looking to remove all the pieces that ia can to reduce weight,i think remving the abs will be definetly a bad idea.
but i dont know what else to remove
Old 08-25-05, 12:05 AM
  #10  
Do it right, do it once

iTrader: (30)
 
turbojeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Eugene, OR, usa
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by rynberg
Getting aftermarket seats will save you 50 lbs and not reduce safety. Eliminating the ABS to save the ~35 lbs on a non-track only car is just stupid IMO.
35lbs!

Probably more like 15lbs max.

I agree otherwise, dumping the ABS is stupid.
Old 08-25-05, 12:27 AM
  #11  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by turbojeff
35lbs!

Probably more like 15lbs max.
Just an off-the-cuff guess.

I have seen figures listed for other cars showing the complete ABS system (including additional piping, wheel speed sensors, and computer unit) weighing in at about 40 lbs.
Old 08-25-05, 01:44 AM
  #12  
Do it right, do it once

iTrader: (30)
 
turbojeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Eugene, OR, usa
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
The sensors and extra piping probably weigh 1-2lb. Pretty much all the weight is the pump itself.
Old 08-25-05, 12:23 PM
  #13  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
fd3s777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NY<=>TW
Posts: 2,191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
keep it on!
Old 08-25-05, 03:32 PM
  #14  
Bye Bye FD , Hello MKIV

 
Jaymez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hrmm , if you want to loose the weight , remove the air pump , interior , stereo , speakers .. ect...

but removing ABS is a bad idea imo.
Old 08-25-05, 04:33 PM
  #15  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by rynberg
Getting aftermarket seats will save you 50 lbs and not reduce safety. Eliminating the ABS to save the ~35 lbs on a non-track only car is just stupid IMO.
50 lbs ??? With my R2 seats at 26 lbs each I did not save much going with kelvar shells and alum. brackets ... to have saved 50lbs I would have needed to use foam pads for seats.
Old 08-25-05, 04:43 PM
  #16  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Julian
50 lbs ??? With my R2 seats at 26 lbs each I did not save much going with kelvar shells and alum. brackets ... to have saved 50lbs I would have needed to use foam pads for seats.
You are right, I misremembered the weight -- OEM leather seats weigh ~28 lbs without rails. So going with a fiberglass or c/f racing shell would probably only save ~26-28 lbs, not 50.
Old 08-25-05, 04:53 PM
  #17  
Avoiding the tree lane

 
BoostFrenzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
speaking of weight savings, how many people remove the spare tire to save weight? i do in my other cars but haven't yet in this one
Old 08-25-05, 04:56 PM
  #18  
Just in time to die

iTrader: (1)
 
Zero R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: look behind you
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You will save around 28lbs getting rid of the seats, I removed my ABS for a few reasons. But if you wanted to be slick about it relocate it to inside the car, it's been done before.
Old 08-25-05, 05:01 PM
  #19  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by BoostFrenzy
speaking of weight savings, how many people remove the spare tire to save weight? i do in my other cars but haven't yet in this one
At the track, yes both for weight and saftey but on road why both.
Old 08-25-05, 05:01 PM
  #20  
Just in time to die

iTrader: (1)
 
Zero R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: look behind you
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by FLA94FD
Your stopping time from 60 will jump 40'. The best drivers in world can't come close to the stoping power of ABS. Tracktion control is another matter the best drivers can best that system.

ABS does not make you stop any sooner, it allows you to keep control. It's been proven over and over a good driver without ABS will stop shorter or the same as a ABS equipped car.
Old 08-25-05, 05:09 PM
  #21  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero R
ABS does not make you stop any sooner, it allows you to keep control. It's been proven over and over a good driver without ABS will stop shorter or the same as a ABS equipped car.
Proven by tests of typical drivers that a) do not engage ABS or b) continue to try to pump brake .. ????

On an ideal surface with an ideal weight distribution between tires, with ideal near lock-up driver control, yes, braking distance w/o abs may be near equal or perhaps sometimes shorter due to a great driver maximizing braking g's by holding at near but never at full lockup versus ABS's on-release pattern. HOWEVER when are things ideal; your weakest tire grip limits braking and can be caused by wheel unloading, from turnin, bump, load transfer from braking etc or surface grip due to roughness, pavement type, moisture, tar, oil, dirt etc. ..... I will take the ABS any day.

The only proven shorter stopping distance wilthout ABS is in snow and gravel; snow not ice, rain, or dry but snow or gravel that builds up in front of a locked wheel.

Last edited by Julian; 08-25-05 at 05:17 PM.
Old 08-25-05, 05:10 PM
  #22  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero R
It's been proven over and over a good driver without ABS will stop shorter or the same as a ABS equipped car.
BS. Please post the tests including the testing conditions. On dry or wet pavement, an ABS-equipped car will stop faster, period. In dusty conditions, dirt, or snow, non-ABS will stop faster due the locked tires developing a wedge of material.

In every racing series that allows the use of ABS, every last car runs it.
Old 08-25-05, 05:13 PM
  #23  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Thanks rynberg, for saying it much more succinctly
Old 08-25-05, 05:39 PM
  #24  
~17 MPG

iTrader: (2)
 
scotty305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 3,292
Received 226 Likes on 152 Posts
There was a good ABS discussion a few months ago:

https://www.rx7club.com/suspension-wheels-tires-brakes-20/abs-removal-394733/



Here's one of the best points:
Originally Posted by rynberg
No human being can keep the wheels on the edge of locking-up as well as an ABS system can, not even Schumacher. An ABS system pulses several times a second, which is much faster than a human being can do it.

Not only that, but you'll never have all four wheels locking up at the same time, even if the braking system is perfectly setup. One or two wheels will always lock up faster than the other ones, due to weight transfer, slightly different traction conditions, etc. With 3 or 4-channel ABS, this doesn't matter, as the system will work to prevent that individual wheel from locking-up WHILE KEEPING THE OTHER WHEELS AT HIGHER BRAKING PRESSURE. This is impossible to do without an ABS system.


-s-
Old 08-26-05, 07:37 AM
  #25  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Here's why a good ABS system will out brake a man every time:

Originally Posted by DamonB
An ABS system allows you to brake to the limit of the tire(s) with the greatest amount of grip while sending less pressure to the other tire(s) on verge of locking. If you were God himself you could not do that with only a brake pedal and a bias bar. This is why a true ABS system will always stop faster; ABS allows each tire to brake to its greatest ability. A man behind a non-ABS brake pedal is forced to brake to the tire of least ability, regardless of that man's talent.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 PM.