3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

ABS should i removed or keep it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 01:02 PM
  #1  
13bmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 619
Likes: 4
From: Miami Fl
Smile ABS should i removed or keep it?

i have a 1993 fd and i am thinking in removed the complete ABS sistem for weight saving and more room in my engine
what you think guys of this, should i removed or keep it
af anyone has removed let me knowyour opinion
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #2  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
For street use, keep it.

For track use, dump it.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #3  
rotorbrain's Avatar
fart on a friends head!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 2
From: sheppard AFB, TX
what are you doing with the car? is this some racers dream? or is this car an ACTUAL track machine? id say you may wanna keep it if your just wanting all the locals to think youre a supercool racecar driver, yo!!!
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #4  
RA8225's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,141
Likes: 46
Originally Posted by rotorbrain
what are you doing with the car? is this some racers dream? or is this car an ACTUAL track machine? id say you may wanna keep it if your just wanting all the locals to think youre a supercool racecar driver, yo!!!
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 01:19 PM
  #5  
93silverbullet's Avatar
Living the dream...
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 2
From: Eugene, Oregon
Originally Posted by cewrx7r1
For street use, keep it.

For track use, dump it.
Couldn't have said it better!
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #6  
FLA94FD's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Clearwater, FL
Originally Posted by cewrx7r1
For street use, keep it.

For track use, dump it.
Is it prohibited on the track?

Your stopping time from 60 will jump 40'. The best drivers in world can't come close to the stoping power of ABS. Tracktion control is another matter the best drivers can best that system.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 09:56 PM
  #7  
13bmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 619
Likes: 4
From: Miami Fl
whell the idea cross my mind because i am lightening the car i already have cf hood cf trunk and fiber glass fenders and someone told me that remove the ABS will save as much as 50 pounds,i dpont know wht else to remove,i know that removing the abs will deadly to brake times on the street

but just asking
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #8  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Getting aftermarket seats will save you 50 lbs and not reduce safety. Eliminating the ABS to save the ~35 lbs on a non-track only car is just stupid IMO.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 10:16 PM
  #9  
13bmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 619
Likes: 4
From: Miami Fl
already have aftermarket seat a pair of recaro and save a lot more than that but im looking to remove all the pieces that ia can to reduce weight,i think remving the abs will be definetly a bad idea.
but i dont know what else to remove
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 12:05 AM
  #10  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
Originally Posted by rynberg
Getting aftermarket seats will save you 50 lbs and not reduce safety. Eliminating the ABS to save the ~35 lbs on a non-track only car is just stupid IMO.
35lbs!

Probably more like 15lbs max.

I agree otherwise, dumping the ABS is stupid.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 12:27 AM
  #11  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by turbojeff
35lbs!

Probably more like 15lbs max.
Just an off-the-cuff guess.

I have seen figures listed for other cars showing the complete ABS system (including additional piping, wheel speed sensors, and computer unit) weighing in at about 40 lbs.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 01:44 AM
  #12  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
The sensors and extra piping probably weigh 1-2lb. Pretty much all the weight is the pump itself.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #13  
fd3s777's Avatar
Registered User
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,191
Likes: 0
From: NY<=>TW
keep it on!
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #14  
Jaymez's Avatar
Bye Bye FD , Hello MKIV
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Canada
Hrmm , if you want to loose the weight , remove the air pump , interior , stereo , speakers .. ect...

but removing ABS is a bad idea imo.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 04:33 PM
  #15  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
Originally Posted by rynberg
Getting aftermarket seats will save you 50 lbs and not reduce safety. Eliminating the ABS to save the ~35 lbs on a non-track only car is just stupid IMO.
50 lbs ??? With my R2 seats at 26 lbs each I did not save much going with kelvar shells and alum. brackets ... to have saved 50lbs I would have needed to use foam pads for seats.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 04:43 PM
  #16  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by Julian
50 lbs ??? With my R2 seats at 26 lbs each I did not save much going with kelvar shells and alum. brackets ... to have saved 50lbs I would have needed to use foam pads for seats.
You are right, I misremembered the weight -- OEM leather seats weigh ~28 lbs without rails. So going with a fiberglass or c/f racing shell would probably only save ~26-28 lbs, not 50.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 04:53 PM
  #17  
BoostFrenzy's Avatar
Avoiding the tree lane
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
speaking of weight savings, how many people remove the spare tire to save weight? i do in my other cars but haven't yet in this one
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #18  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 2
From: look behind you
You will save around 28lbs getting rid of the seats, I removed my ABS for a few reasons. But if you wanted to be slick about it relocate it to inside the car, it's been done before.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 05:01 PM
  #19  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
Originally Posted by BoostFrenzy
speaking of weight savings, how many people remove the spare tire to save weight? i do in my other cars but haven't yet in this one
At the track, yes both for weight and saftey but on road why both.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 05:01 PM
  #20  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 2
From: look behind you
Originally Posted by FLA94FD
Your stopping time from 60 will jump 40'. The best drivers in world can't come close to the stoping power of ABS. Tracktion control is another matter the best drivers can best that system.

ABS does not make you stop any sooner, it allows you to keep control. It's been proven over and over a good driver without ABS will stop shorter or the same as a ABS equipped car.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 05:09 PM
  #21  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
Originally Posted by Zero R
ABS does not make you stop any sooner, it allows you to keep control. It's been proven over and over a good driver without ABS will stop shorter or the same as a ABS equipped car.
Proven by tests of typical drivers that a) do not engage ABS or b) continue to try to pump brake .. ????

On an ideal surface with an ideal weight distribution between tires, with ideal near lock-up driver control, yes, braking distance w/o abs may be near equal or perhaps sometimes shorter due to a great driver maximizing braking g's by holding at near but never at full lockup versus ABS's on-release pattern. HOWEVER when are things ideal; your weakest tire grip limits braking and can be caused by wheel unloading, from turnin, bump, load transfer from braking etc or surface grip due to roughness, pavement type, moisture, tar, oil, dirt etc. ..... I will take the ABS any day.

The only proven shorter stopping distance wilthout ABS is in snow and gravel; snow not ice, rain, or dry but snow or gravel that builds up in front of a locked wheel.

Last edited by Julian; Aug 25, 2005 at 05:17 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 05:10 PM
  #22  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by Zero R
It's been proven over and over a good driver without ABS will stop shorter or the same as a ABS equipped car.
BS. Please post the tests including the testing conditions. On dry or wet pavement, an ABS-equipped car will stop faster, period. In dusty conditions, dirt, or snow, non-ABS will stop faster due the locked tires developing a wedge of material.

In every racing series that allows the use of ABS, every last car runs it.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 05:13 PM
  #23  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
Thanks rynberg, for saying it much more succinctly
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 05:39 PM
  #24  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 334
From: Bend, OR
There was a good ABS discussion a few months ago:

https://www.rx7club.com/suspension-wheels-tires-brakes-20/abs-removal-394733/



Here's one of the best points:
Originally Posted by rynberg
No human being can keep the wheels on the edge of locking-up as well as an ABS system can, not even Schumacher. An ABS system pulses several times a second, which is much faster than a human being can do it.

Not only that, but you'll never have all four wheels locking up at the same time, even if the braking system is perfectly setup. One or two wheels will always lock up faster than the other ones, due to weight transfer, slightly different traction conditions, etc. With 3 or 4-channel ABS, this doesn't matter, as the system will work to prevent that individual wheel from locking-up WHILE KEEPING THE OTHER WHEELS AT HIGHER BRAKING PRESSURE. This is impossible to do without an ABS system.


-s-
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 07:37 AM
  #25  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Here's why a good ABS system will out brake a man every time:

Originally Posted by DamonB
An ABS system allows you to brake to the limit of the tire(s) with the greatest amount of grip while sending less pressure to the other tire(s) on verge of locking. If you were God himself you could not do that with only a brake pedal and a bias bar. This is why a true ABS system will always stop faster; ABS allows each tire to brake to its greatest ability. A man behind a non-ABS brake pedal is forced to brake to the tire of least ability, regardless of that man's talent.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 PM.