3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

~50k mile stock car vs. ~80-100k w/ reman?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-03, 07:55 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
DefBringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
~50k mile stock car vs. ~80-100k w/ reman?

Considering getting back into the game (Bought a 94 in 99, sold it in 2001). Surprised about the lack of low-mile, affordable FDs....looks like the market finally rebounded on these cars.

So my question is this: what is the current logic on totally stock cars with around 40-60k miles versus cars with 70-100k miles on them but with remanufactured engines with under 20k miles on them?

My first temptation is to lean towards the stock car (as I did the first time) but the selection of stock cars has REALLY dwindled since I was shopping back in 98/99. I'd like to spend $17,500 or less on a clean black or red manual and for that price, I mean *clean*.
Old 04-18-03, 07:58 AM
  #2  
Rotary Freak

 
vudoodoodoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BWAHAHAHAHA! RX-7 OWNZ JOO!!!
Old 04-18-03, 07:59 AM
  #3  
Rotary Freak

 
vudoodoodoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Old 04-18-03, 08:05 AM
  #4  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
DefBringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
shhhh dude please don't tell OT this....I need to keep this on the down-low. :o
Old 04-18-03, 08:11 AM
  #5  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
I would look for one with a rebuilt or reman that has low mileage on the motor. I don't think I would go for one with lots of mods because either one of two things would be up with a car like that:

a. It's had the **** driven out of it
b. It's all show

I would look for a car with mild mods, the normal reliability ones with good care for the paint and interior.

Good luck!
Old 04-18-03, 08:16 AM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

 
vudoodoodoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DefBringer
shhhh dude please don't tell OT this....I need to keep this on the down-low. :o
BWAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Old 04-18-03, 08:18 AM
  #7  
Does not drive a WRX!!!

iTrader: (6)
 
wReX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This is a good question and I myself am currently facing it as well. I pretty much have concluded that with the higher milage cars the chassis has been through a lot and is probably getting worn out and starting to get all the little rattles and such. Things like bushings, mounts, struts, ect are all going to be in need of replacement. I would think that you are less likely to find a cleaner car that has been driven twice as much. Then again there are those that have taken care of these cars, so they do exist. I'd probably opt for the lower mileage car because chances are it would be in better shape. You can repair the mechanical things down the road, but I don't wanna be replacing the carpet or getting it painted because it has all these little dings on the body. I always see these cars with new engines and have to wonder if they were broken in properly and such. .02
Old 04-18-03, 08:27 AM
  #8  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
DefBringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by wReX
This is a good question and I myself am currently facing it as well. I pretty much have concluded that with the higher milage cars the chassis has been through a lot and is probably getting worn out and starting to get all the little rattles and such. Things like bushings, mounts, struts, ect are all going to be in need of replacement. I would think that you are less likely to find a cleaner car that has been driven twice as much. Then again there are those that have taken care of these cars, so they do exist. I'd probably opt for the lower mileage car because chances are it would be in better shape. You can repair the mechanical things down the road, but I don't wanna be replacing the carpet or getting it painted because it has all these little dings on the body. I always see these cars with new engines and have to wonder if they were broken in properly and such. .02
That's what I was thinking as well. I'd prefer to buy from a knowledgable owner but the risk involved there is that that same person probably also drove the **** out of it, as you say.

I'm a perfectionist and rattles and paint blemishes bug the crap out of me (my last FD was daily driven on a horrible highway with lots of rock chips by the previous owner).
Old 04-18-03, 08:46 AM
  #9  
Full Member

 
dpasseto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was on the same boat as you guys. I bought mine in October of 2001 with 20,075 miles. I paid a nice chunk for it. It was a very knowledgeable owner with all paperwork. I was impressed. The car now has 29,000 and mostly sits in my garage under a cover. I drove it quite a bit in the first month....Maybe 3000 miles . I also bought it because it was bone stock. I didn't want one which had Guitto's grease palms all over it.

In other words, I have the car you're looking for.

I race motorcycles and the FD is getting a bit expensive to have just sitting around. I would consider selling it if you're seriously interested. You can contact me at Dennys.Passeto@verizon.net
Old 04-18-03, 04:03 PM
  #10  
ttb
No Cup Holder Racing

 
ttb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my thinking has always been get the stock one, because i want to know exactly what i'm doing to my car. sure the reman may only have a few thousand miles on it, but who knows what was done to it in those few thousand miles...you if put the engine in yourself then you know who is to blame when it blows. but this route is obviously more expensive.
Old 04-18-03, 06:58 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
agent712's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hastings, Nebraska
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey, my car is going to be for sale soon. Its got a brand new reman with only approx 100 miles. The car has around 94 or so thousand on it. Its in the shop right now getting everything looked at. Its is in almost mint condition outside and the interior has a few loose things, like the window controller and the console thing has a broken clip. Check out the pics of it on the link below. I am willing to take 17.5 for it if you're interested.
Nick
Old 04-18-03, 11:42 PM
  #12  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
kwikrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My car will be going up for sale in about 2 weeks for $20K - little more than you wanted to spend but also has a lot of money invested. Getting the mirrors and rear bumper painted. 80K on body and 5K on streetported motor from KDR..1K on new hybrid twin turbos - cars in great shape except for the typical tear in the driver's seat left side..

If the car was built and maintained by a reputable shop or knowledgeable owner then a modded car with a new engine is the best buy - because we all know that if the engine and turbos weren't replaced - it will need to be. Also remans don't include oil and coolant porting, silicone seals and o-rings.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
11-17-15 05:57 PM
highspeedrider
Introduce yourself
6
08-19-15 03:44 AM
befarrer
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
4
08-14-15 04:18 PM



Quick Reply: ~50k mile stock car vs. ~80-100k w/ reman?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.