3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

~~~1993 rx7 0-60

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #26  
habu2's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Dallas TX
Holy Thread Revival, Batman !

Six years, five months and 14 days.

And added nothing to the thread...
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 06:00 PM
  #27  
2RotorsNaDream's Avatar
¿¿What are pistons??
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
From: Queens NYC
Originally Posted by habu2
Holy Thread Revival, Batman !

Six years, five months and 14 days.

And added nothing to the thread...
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #28  
RotaryDreamz's Avatar
INCREASE THE PEACE
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
^
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 09:23 AM
  #29  
Sled Driver's Avatar
The Anti-Prius
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 3
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by mbooker269
jus wonderin waht the 0-60 time is for a stock 1993 RX7
for school projest

Well............ He's still in school........... Working on his "projest"

Do they ride short buses in Canada?

I know they published numerous articles in 1992 with performance stats of the new Rx-7, but I only trust what I read on the Internet. Usually from some stranger who thinks he once heard from a friend who knows this guy with a mustache quoted him.

That, my friend, is FACT! Magazines just guess, or inflate the truth

I find it humorous that people think the stats quoted by magazines & manufacturers are easy to duplicate.

Give it your best shot; the majority of drivers can’t even get close. Just cause your car posted a sub 13-second pass doesn’t mean YOU can do a sub 13-second pass.

Notice that nobody actually posted "their" 0-60 time?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 09:43 AM
  #30  
radiantRX-7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Florida
I have a g-tech, and did 5sec.'s running 8lbs of boost. I think I could have done better though.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #31  
Dudemaaanownsanrx7's Avatar
wannaspeed.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 5
From: Texas
I can make my speedometer hit 60 in under 2 seconds, though the car is only doing about 5 or 10 mph.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 06:18 PM
  #32  
amunoz3's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, az
Originally Posted by kwikrx7
Auto FD 0-60 is low-mid 6s and 1/4 in 14.5 (poopy) - I remember the comparison between an auto FD, LT1 Camaro, and something else - the auto FD lost.

I think a overall average number to use for all manual stock FDs would be 5.2 since that's what I've seen the most.


I dissagree a.......lot. my stock auto hit a 13.9 stock with bad turbos and some people that have accounts on this forum have seen me do it. whoever did that comparison cant drive for ****.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NJ-JDM
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
43
Aug 23, 2015 11:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 AM.