3rd Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 3rd Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

v mount setup pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #251  
Integrals's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
cool, as long as it works!
Yeah it works well TO give an idea on size, notice the size of the cold side pipe exiting the intercooler Most of the cooler is hidden I guess lol
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 02:52 AM
  #252  
fendamonky's Avatar
F'n Newbie...
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 323
From: Nokesville, Va
Originally Posted by AshC
need to clean the flies off
I spy an RE:worx kit ^_^

Originally Posted by theorie
that is WAYYYYY too much intercooler for the stock twins IMO. you're probably doing more harm than good with that large of an IC. looks more like a radiator than an IC!
I disagree, completely. I have the same kit as Ash and it's phenominal! There is very little pressure loss and the cooling is incredible (solid water temps, air temps stay 10 degrees above ambient) and there is really no need for ducting since there is NO ROOM for it!

I can, and have, pushed 17-18psi through my BNRs all day long without a raise in intake/water temps while using this kit.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 04:29 AM
  #253  
staticguitar313's Avatar
R.I.P. Icemark
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 1
From: gilbert, arizona
I want to see more like HedgeHog's setup!
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 12:14 PM
  #254  
s1mpsons's Avatar
HamfistRacing.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 4
From: NYC
Bump this thread.

I would like to know more about Vmount setups with the radiator on TOP. Pictures, issues, pros, cons. I have the following thoughts.

1. Traffic intercooler heat soak would be a NON-issue with such a setup. When the radiator unit is on the bottom, like most vmounts, the heat still rises (basic physics) even with the fans on. This sends heat to the IC. This would NOT happen if radiator is on the top.

2. Keeping the radiator away from the road surface and related hazards to avoid damage and cooling system failure is a good thing.

3. Longer intake pipes are not good for boost response, but they wouldn't be any worse than a FMIC.

4. The radiator size might be an issue. How high can the radiator can be raised until interference with other components becomes an issue?

5. Maintaining the general OE radiator orientation (heat blows up) means that you should be able to use factory components more easily.

6. This setup would benefit best from a vented hood with shroud to direct radiator air away from other engine components (same with any setup I suppose)

Here is the only example I have seen in this thread and it certainly look impressive.

Originally Posted by HedgeHog
Just for laffs, this is my setup that was described previously...

Endtank w/ flow separation vanes (rough stage):


Front view during assembly:


Engine bay view:


Front air splitter:


Vented undertray:
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 07:00 PM
  #255  
David0ff's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 436
Likes: 1
From: Montreal , Canada
here is what i came up with for 200 bux ... 3" in/out intercooler
2.75 ( sock IN ) ... 3" OUT ... greddy elbow grinded to the 3"mark plus i eliminated soem 90 deg. turnse out of the stock design ...

[IMG][/IMG]



no time to do the ducting . maybe over the winter
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #256  
s1mpsons's Avatar
HamfistRacing.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 4
From: NYC
That is a stock mount IC
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 07:37 PM
  #257  
JhnRx7's Avatar
Golf Cart Hooligan
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 998
Likes: 30
From: Philadelphia, PA
Originally Posted by s1mpsons
That is a stock mount IC
And getting fed super hot air from the radiator!
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 08:14 PM
  #258  
mannykiller's Avatar
Garage Hero
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (93)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 19
From: Quartz Hill
Originally Posted by herblenny
This is pretty impressive!

This is extremely impressive......only think I would change is venting for engine bey heat. I'd add a few here and there. But your set up is what i'll be replicating in my custom set up... Good stuff man!!
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 08:51 AM
  #259  
james81's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Durban, South Africa
dam that thing must be loud, ain got no silencing!
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #260  
theorie's Avatar
AponOUT!?
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 13
From: Sarasota, FL
Originally Posted by David0ff
here is what i came up with for 200 bux ... 3" in/out intercooler
2.75 ( sock IN ) ... 3" OUT ... greddy elbow grinded to the 3"mark plus i eliminated soem 90 deg. turnse out of the stock design ...

no time to do the ducting . maybe over the winter
that is going to be WORSE than stock - there's no ducting.

for a stock-mount setup you MUST HAVE DUCTING! without ducting, that thing is going to heatsoak within 5 minutes of driving. it's pointless without ducting.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #261  
staticguitar313's Avatar
R.I.P. Icemark
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 1
From: gilbert, arizona
Originally Posted by s1mpsons
Bump this thread.

I would like to know more about Vmount setups with the radiator on TOP. Pictures, issues, pros, cons. I have the following thoughts.

1. Traffic intercooler heat soak would be a NON-issue with such a setup. When the radiator unit is on the bottom, like most vmounts, the heat still rises (basic physics) even with the fans on. This sends heat to the IC. This would NOT happen if radiator is on the top.

2. Keeping the radiator away from the road surface and related hazards to avoid damage and cooling system failure is a good thing.

3. Longer intake pipes are not good for boost response, but they wouldn't be any worse than a FMIC.

4. The radiator size might be an issue. How high can the radiator can be raised until interference with other components becomes an issue?

5. Maintaining the general OE radiator orientation (heat blows up) means that you should be able to use factory components more easily.

6. This setup would benefit best from a vented hood with shroud to direct radiator air away from other engine components (same with any setup I suppose)

Here is the only example I have seen in this thread and it certainly look impressive.
Going it be doing this myself, i see no downside to it. Also the radiator is away from the ground and harms way.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 01:20 AM
  #262  
Wo:Deep's Avatar
DAMN!Nice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 403
Likes: 2
From: Germany
Here is my Knight-Sports V-Mount Setup.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 08:07 AM
  #263  
s1mpsons's Avatar
HamfistRacing.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 4
From: NYC
^^^ What bumper is that?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 09:25 AM
  #264  
sp_amend's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
i believe that's an Ing bumper, but what intake box is that??
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 09:35 AM
  #265  
Wo:Deep's Avatar
DAMN!Nice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 403
Likes: 2
From: Germany
Originally Posted by sp_amend
i believe that's an Ing bumper, but what intake box is that??
Half right...
INGS+1 bumper

Intake is Knight-Sports Cold Air intake for V-Mount


here is a link:
http://www.neweraparts.com/Default.a...&ProductID=408
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 11:25 AM
  #266  
metalCORE's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Germany
...lol, man what do you think he means with "Ing", no reason to be stuffy here...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #267  
Wo:Deep's Avatar
DAMN!Nice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 403
Likes: 2
From: Germany
Originally Posted by metalCORE
...lol, man what do you think he means with "Ing", no reason to be stuffy here...
WTF??
why are you bitching around here?? I know that he meant INGS+1 but maybe S1mpsons didn´t knew.
search in google "ING Rx-7"
and you´ll see why I corrected sp_amend...
not to show him that he is stupid, but to help s1mpsons to find it if he´ll search for it.

Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #268  
s1mpsons's Avatar
HamfistRacing.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 4
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Wo:Deep
search in google "ING Rx-7"
and that is what I did...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 03:56 PM
  #269  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,766
Likes: 794
From: Bay Area CA
Originally Posted by s1mpsons
Bump this thread.

I would like to know more about Vmount setups with the radiator on TOP. Pictures, issues, pros, cons. I have the following thoughts.

1. Traffic intercooler heat soak would be a NON-issue with such a setup. When the radiator unit is on the bottom, like most vmounts, the heat still rises (basic physics) even with the fans on. This sends heat to the IC. This would NOT happen if radiator is on the top.
I disagree.
With the radiator on top, heat from the radiator is being blown up and into the engine bay increasing underhood temps and heat soak.
With the radiator on the bottom, heat from the radiator is being blown down and under the car. Especially if you vent the undertray.
From a real life testing standpoint, I vented the stock undertray by cutting some openings in it to better vent rad heat. This change alone resulted in a noticeable difference in AITs when stuck in traffic or slow speed situations.


Originally Posted by s1mpsons
2. Keeping the radiator away from the road surface and related hazards to avoid damage and cooling system failure is a good thing.
Why is there a perceived benefit in this? Instead you place the IC in a more hazardous position. If it breaks, you injest foreign objects into your intake and blow the motor. If the rad breaks, you have a little more time to recover.

Design the mounting system properly as Speed of Light did on his setup (which I use) and risk of road surface hazard is decreased significantly.

Search for pics of his mounting subframe on this and other threads for more info.


Originally Posted by s1mpsons
3. Longer intake pipes are not good for boost response, but they wouldn't be any worse than a FMIC.
From a packaging perspective, it makes more sense to keep the IC on top. That is where the piping is shortest and already positioned for the most appropriate routing.

Originally Posted by s1mpsons
4. The radiator size might be an issue. How high can the radiator can be raised until interference with other components becomes an issue?
Not very much. there are many packaging constraints.

Originally Posted by s1mpsons
5. Maintaining the general OE radiator orientation (heat blows up) means that you should be able to use factory components more easily.
Bad assumption. There is very little you can reuse w/o modifying in some way. The PS cooler needs to be repositioned. A/C lines are easier to reuse with minor modification if the rad and A/C condenser is on the bottom. You'd have to seriously modify A/C lines if it were on top.

Originally Posted by s1mpsons
6. This setup would benefit best from a vented hood with shroud to direct radiator air away from other engine components (same with any setup I suppose)
In my experience, even more so with a vented hood, having the IC on top is the better orientation.


Originally Posted by s1mpsons
Here is the only example I have seen in this thread and it certainly look impressive.
I personally don't think it does. Its obvious he spent a lot of time on it but there are a few shortcomings that I see:

1. The IC piping is longer than with a 'standard' V-Mount setup
2. The IC core is almost parallel to the air flow. Air To Air cores work best when they are perpendicular to air flow. The more flatter or parallel it is mounted, the less efficient.
3. The Radiator core is also almost parallel to air flow also therefore less efficient.

You want to try and design the < shape to be as wide as possible to try and promote the best possible air flow and increase overall efficiency. Ducting can only help already efficient design. Ducting can help a marginal design work better but its not optimal IMO and experience.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #270  
s1mpsons's Avatar
HamfistRacing.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 4
From: NYC
All very good thoughts and correct. Try and read my points 1 & 6 together. With a good hood vent with shroud/ducting, I don't think heat soak will as you say.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 02:16 AM
  #271  
silverfdturbo6port's Avatar
500+hp club
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 4
From: .


Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 06:50 AM
  #272  
brad89au's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Australia
maximum radiator angle while keeping it well above the tow hooks for safety and very close ducting:


maximum angle for intercooler to allow most flow through the 4.5" thick core. and still plenty of room for a nice cold air intake thats fed from the front bumper opening:


and even with a stock hood i still see IATs of 35-40* while cruising (still running in tho so cant boost it yet)

Brad.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 12:46 PM
  #273  
BoostedPenguin's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 334
Likes: 1
From: La Mirada, Ca



Rotary extreme powedercoated wrinkle black
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2010 | 02:47 AM
  #274  
brad89au's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Australia
penguin: i love the wrinkle finish, is it hard to keep clean? i know my satin black is a massive pita to keep dust and **** off.... partly due to having one gaurd liner missing but still, is it easy enough to keep clean?

Brad.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2010 | 01:05 PM
  #275  
BoostedPenguin's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 334
Likes: 1
From: La Mirada, Ca
I have yet to clean it since putting it on ( nov 09 )

Very easy on maintenance.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.