3rd Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 3rd Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

The RX-7 confirmed to be in the pipeline for 2017---RX-Vision Unveil!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 09:15 AM
  #1526  
Tem120's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 6
From: Miami
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
I would take those problems you had with your BMW over major driveline and power plant component failures any day.
Just the fact you think the BMW brand is junk and were so unhappy with your M5 ownership experience over those niggily things makes me wonder why you chose an RX-7 which is arguably worse.

While a fuel pump can easily leave you stranded most everything else that failed on your BMW wouldn't.

I've never had to tow any car I've ever owned more often then my FD. Its also the car I've put the least mileage on and spent the most money fixing (by exponentially higher amounts) then any car by far.
I've owned probably 20 cars of all differing makes and models.

The FD makes a Range Rover look reliable. BMW/Audi have thier issues but for what you get in ride quality, luxury, amenities, performance and fun factor in a practical form factor for daily driving then I say most of those issues you stated are livable.

Because seriously, who wants to drive a Lexus?

Disclaimer- LFA excluded.
mmmm I dont know about this .. is the rotary really so unreliable . it doesn't accept mistakes like a piston engine does . and its more strict with its maintenance But when its working right . keeping it that way is not really rocket science . just meticulous.

like its been stated above . FD is a car that takes better to someone who tinkers and tinkers RIGHT not just careless tinkering . but learning to tinket correctly is an expensive and timely process . lol
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 09:20 AM
  #1527  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
I'm confused, is the FD more unreliable than the FC? I've been raping the same engine on my TII since 2006 and compression hasn't dropped more than 5 psi tops. I kid you not, I overheated this car so many times in high school not knowing how bad that was, ran it out of gas in the middle of a race (lean), and was running it around 13's AFR full boost before I knew better for about a year. The car is in my garage now and I have no doubt that if I jumped in it and would fire up quicker than my Saturn hot or cold like it always does...it will smell like sh*t and get horrible gas mileage but, don't care. What makes the FD worse or am I just lucky?

EDIT: I only used 87 octane from 2006-2008...and raced every week like I was in a Fast and Furious movie. This forum makes me so paranoid to drive my car even with it's excellent track record.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 09:36 AM
  #1528  
Tem120's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 6
From: Miami
Originally Posted by rx7 SE
I'm confused, is the FD more unreliable than the FC? I've been raping the same engine on my TII since 2006 and compression hasn't dropped more than 5 psi tops. I kid you not, I overheated this car so many times in high school not knowing how bad that was, ran it out of gas in the middle of a race (lean), and was running it around 13's AFR full boost before I knew better for about a year. The car is in my garage now and I have no doubt that if I jumped in it and would fire up quicker than my Saturn hot or cold like it always does...it will smell like sh*t and get horrible gas mileage but, don't care. What makes the FD worse or am I just lucky?

EDIT: I only used 87 octane from 2006-2008...and raced every week like I was in a Fast and Furious movie. This forum makes me so paranoid to drive my car even with it's excellent track record.
There are always anomalies, Exceptions that prove the rule .

the NA FC's are very reliable . but the Turbo cars well are supposed to be a bit less reliable .. Due to finer tolerances and heat from the turbo .
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 09:39 AM
  #1529  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by rx7 SE
I'm confused, is the FD more unreliable than the FC? I've been raping the same engine on my TII since 2006 and compression hasn't dropped more than 5 psi tops. I kid you not, I overheated this car so many times in high school not knowing how bad that was, ran it out of gas in the middle of a race (lean), and was running it around 13's AFR full boost before I knew better for about a year. The car is in my garage now and I have no doubt that if I jumped in it and would fire up quicker than my Saturn hot or cold like it always does...it will smell like sh*t and get horrible gas mileage but, don't care. What makes the FD worse?

EDIT: I only used 87 octane from 2006-2008...and raced every week like I was in a Fast and Furious movie
As far as I know the FD has a stronger trans, diff and engine.

You are just a lucky bastard

Seriously though in my experience these are tough little sports cars
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 10:30 AM
  #1530  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom

I would take those problems you had with your BMW over major driveline and power plant component failures any day.
Just the fact you think the BMW brand is junk and were so unhappy with your M5 ownership experience over those niggily things makes me wonder why you chose an RX-7 which is arguably worse.

Why do you put words in my mouth about me claiming a specific manufacturers is junk? I never said such a thing. Do I dislike the quirky experience ive had with my particular M5? Yes! Did I have a similar quirky experience with my fd or previous Rx7's? No I didn't. Now does that mean I think the BMW brand as a whole is junk and Mazda superior? Nope! I love the quality of my m5's interior. It's solidly build, doesn't squeak and rattle, and has the most comfortable highway seats I've sat in. Plus the climate system is great and heats fast in the winter. Every time I've made comparisons about failures, I specifically talked about my specific INDIVIDUAL experiences. Not once did I ever claim the fd Rx7 was more reliable. My fd was reliable and less problematic that my M5. Why is that so hard to comprehend?. I can't speak for everyone else's fd experience, but MINE was no where near as problematic as others.

While a fuel pump can easily leave you stranded most everything else that failed on your BMW wouldn't.
Doesn't matter as I feel that a 75+k car should have basic components that last otherwise how do you justify the added cost of the much more expensive vehicle? I guess there's a reason these hi end luxury cars depreciate so fast. This reason is why I will never buy one brand new.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 10:44 AM
  #1531  
djseven's Avatar
Eh
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,553
Likes: 344
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
I would take those problems you had with your BMW over major driveline and power plant component failures any day.
Just the fact you think the BMW brand is junk and were so unhappy with your M5 ownership experience over those niggily things makes me wonder why you chose an RX-7 which is arguably worse.

While a fuel pump can easily leave you stranded most everything else that failed on your BMW wouldn't.

I've never had to tow any car I've ever owned more often then my FD. Its also the car I've put the least mileage on and spent the most money fixing (by exponentially higher amounts) then any car by far.
I've owned probably 20 cars of all differing makes and models.

The FD makes a Range Rover look reliable. BMW/Audi have thier issues but for what you get in ride quality, luxury, amenities, performance and fun factor in a practical form factor for daily driving then I say most of those issues you stated are livable.

Because seriously, who wants to drive a Lexus?

Disclaimer- LFA excluded.

Ive never had an FD I built or was in close to factory shape leave me stranded. Your issues may speak more of your car and the owner than the FD itself. The only real issues/differences that separate the FD from every other car on the road is the Rotary Engine(over boost and blow a seal and you have a 50/50 shot of being stranded), the factory AST exploding purging all coolant requiring a tow, or the fuel pulsation dampner leaking(doesnt require a tow but that is kinda playing russian roullete).

The rest of the issues with the FD are not crippling to the car but just annoying. Once again Im not blind to the inherent issues of the FD, but the owners are often its biggest downfall.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 10:51 AM
  #1532  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by rx7 SE
I'm confused, is the FD more unreliable than the FC? I've been raping the same engine on my TII since 2006 and compression hasn't dropped more than 5 psi tops. I kid you not, I overheated this car so many times in high school not knowing how bad that was, ran it out of gas in the middle of a race (lean), and was running it around 13's AFR full boost before I knew better for about a year. The car is in my garage now and I have no doubt that if I jumped in it and would fire up quicker than my Saturn hot or cold like it always does...it will smell like sh*t and get horrible gas mileage but, don't care. What makes the FD worse or am I just lucky?

EDIT: I only used 87 octane from 2006-2008...and raced every week like I was in a Fast and Furious movie. This forum makes me so paranoid to drive my car even with it's excellent track record.

To be fair, you have to compare the series versions. The series 6 fd is very problematic. Unfortunalty, this is the only version we got here in the state's. 94's are better with 95's being the superior US models in terms of build quality and refinement. Thing is, the majority of the reported problems are on the 93's (and those are the ones that flooded the market). There isn't a manufacturer out there that has an all new model without excessive problems its 1st couple years of production (Rx8 anyone). A lot of people forget how much Mazda improved the car over the years. My particular fd was an good example of some of those improvements.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 11:00 AM
  #1533  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by djseven

The rest of the issues with the FD are not crippling to the car but just annoying. Once again Im not blind to the inherent issues of the FD, but the owners are often its biggest downfall.

So true! I wouldn't doubt that the fd rx7 is probably the most abused car Mazda built. Not too many cars are built to for you can drive the hell out of them without much upgrades. My rx7 was the 1st turbo car I owned. The 1st time I went to the drag strip, I tried to let the car idle to cool it down. Well I opened the hood and was like f+ck it's hot in their. So I jumped in and cruised 1 mile up the road and back. Popped the hood again and everything was nice a cool. I knew right then that I would never shut my car down again after hard run without driving it lightly to cool it down 1st. This is how I saved my engine components from heat problems and why I never bought a useless turbo trimmer. You would be surprised how much more reliable the twin turbo system is when it's not over heated and cooled down properly.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 11:25 AM
  #1534  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by t-von
To be fair, you have to compare the series versions. The series 6 fd is very problematic. Unfortunalty, this is the only version we got here in the state's. 94's are better with 95's being the superior US models in terms of build quality and refinement. Thing is, the majority of the reported problems are on the 93's (and those are the ones that flooded the market). There isn't a manufacturer out there that has an all new model without excessive problems its 1st couple years of production (Rx8 anyone). A lot of people forget how much Mazda improved the car over the years. My particular fd was an good example of some of those improvements.
I wonder if the newer FD's in Japan have the same reliability issues we've experienced here in the states?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 11:31 AM
  #1535  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn
Seriously though in my experience these are tough little sports cars
that has been my experience too.

Originally Posted by djseven
Ive never had an FD I built or was in close to factory shape leave me stranded.
i've driven nothing but Rx7's from 1994, up to today, except for a period in 2009-2012, where i had a piston DD. not sure on the number of different cars, its around 20, but i've had every year of Rx7, except 94 and 95. including a 3 rotor FC.

except for the 3 rotor, i've only been towed once. Node and I took my 79 to sevenstock (1000mile round trip, 24mpg), and the wire to the leading points died in the gym parking lot 10 miles from home. since it made it 990miles of the 1000, i was ok with that.

i used an E11 in the 3 rotor, and it would lock up and go into boot mode all the time, so that thing got towed home a LOT. in 2003 the E11 was just about all you could get...
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 12:42 PM
  #1536  
Tem120's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 6
From: Miami
The FD as a car has issues , but notall of them are because of the rotary..

Weak fuel pump . causing lean conditions quite a few rx7's blew up due to naive owners putting an exhaust on the car By itself .

the fuel pump rewire makes night and day difference .

just some of the small things that early owners did that made the cars go boom . and it wasn't really the rotary's fault just the car was built at the limit of its components .
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 01:30 PM
  #1537  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
I was surprised how many problems my dad's 3-series had, and it was super low mileage and well cared for. Stuff I would consider very "un-BMW like" based on perceived reputation. Repeated electrical issues, odd noises and rattles, mechanical ancillary parts like pumps and such going bad. Dad traded it in on a C5, which has it's own issues. Too many gadgety electronics in cars now. Do I really need doors to automatically close themselves the last half inch, or mirrors to re-aim themselves when I put it in reverse?! Time was when a man could back his ******* car up without GPS assistance.
that reminds me of the E36 and how the windows would automatically open 1/2" and then close after the door was shut. it put a lot of stress on the window regulators which caused them to always shear the brittle plastic clutch gears inside the regulator... after a few failures i took the regulator apart and screwed the whole thing together so there was no rubber bushing or breakaway clutch mechanism. it's better to have the motor fail/break than continuously fix that stupid piece of broken plastic.

i think the most annoying part of this whole thing was how the door panel would basically fall apart into a dozen pieces everytime i would have to take it off, having to hot glue everything back together everytime.

and i only owned that car for a year!

not to mention the BMW forums are completely worthless, any hint of a cooling system problem and the answer was "replace the whole cooling system every 30k miles". i spent months going around in circles trying to figure out why the car registered as running hot, a previous shop already replaced the radiator, belts, thermostat, and water pump. after getting annoyed with it i compared the actual engine temps to the gauge and found the dummy gauge was bad, reading just off the red while the car was running 170F.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; Feb 7, 2014 at 01:39 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 03:13 PM
  #1538  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by rx7 SE

I wonder if the newer FD's in Japan have the same reliability issues we've experienced here in the states?
That car had lots of improvements and SHOULD be way more reliable than what we got here.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 03:46 PM
  #1539  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by j9fd3s

except for the 3 rotor, i've only been towed once. Node and I took my 79 to sevenstock (1000mile round trip, 24mpg), and the wire to the leading points died in the gym parking lot 10 miles from home. since it made it 990miles of the 1000, i was ok with that.
This reminds me about something. I did get stranded once in my 84 12a back in college. I was cruising along the interstate when all of a sudden my tach started fluttering. Shortly afterwards the engine died. I didnt have a cell phone back in 95 so I had to hike the 2 miles to class. Well class is over so I get my car and she starts right up. I'm like hmm? Well I start driving home and as soon as I get close to the house the tach starts fluttering again and she dies soon afterwards. Now I'm mad because that is a weird *** problem. Well after checking the electrical diagram, I found that the tach signal and fuel pump were on the same circuit and joined together on one of the ignition coils. So I check the lead and sure enough it was rusted. I cleaned the connector and never had the problem return.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 04:59 PM
  #1540  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution

not to mention the BMW forums are completely worthless, any hint of a cooling system problem and the answer was "replace the whole cooling system every 30k miles".
well you should change the cooling system every 30k, its made from old newspapers and banana peels. there are a ton of threads where the OP replaced a whole system of parts (ignition, cooling) and still had the same problem, not a great way to diagnose things...
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 05:06 PM
  #1541  
BurntOrangeT2's Avatar
No phonebook but OG calls
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 3
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
I would take those problems you had with your BMW over major driveline and power plant component failures any day.
Just the fact you think the BMW brand is junk and were so unhappy with your M5 ownership experience over those niggily things makes me wonder why you chose an RX-7 which is arguably worse.

While a fuel pump can easily leave you stranded most everything else that failed on your BMW wouldn't.

I've never had to tow any car I've ever owned more often then my FD. Its also the car I've put the least mileage on and spent the most money fixing (by exponentially higher amounts) then any car by far.
I've owned probably 20 cars of all differing makes and models.

The FD makes a Range Rover look reliable. BMW/Audi have thier issues but for what you get in ride quality, luxury, amenities, performance and fun factor in a practical form factor for daily driving then I say most of those issues you stated are livable.

Because seriously, who wants to drive a Lexus?


Disclaimer- LFA excluded.
I don't know about anyone else but the GS F-Sport is ******* drop dead sexy in all aspects. Hell even the LS 460 F-Sport is sexy as hell too.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2014 | 12:15 PM
  #1542  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
I would take those problems you had with your BMW over major driveline and power plant component failures any day.
Just the fact you think the BMW brand is junk and were so unhappy with your M5 ownership experience over those niggily things makes me wonder why you chose an RX-7 which is arguably worse.

While a fuel pump can easily leave you stranded most everything else that failed on your BMW wouldn't.

I've never had to tow any car I've ever owned more often then my FD. Its also the car I've put the least mileage on and spent the most money fixing (by exponentially higher amounts) then any car by far.
I've owned probably 20 cars of all differing makes and models.

The FD makes a Range Rover look reliable. BMW/Audi have thier issues but for what you get in ride quality, luxury, amenities, performance and fun factor in a practical form factor for daily driving then I say most of those issues you stated are livable.

Because seriously, who wants to drive a Lexus?

Disclaimer- LFA excluded.
The FD with basic bolt ons is a ROCK!!!!

You either owned a lemon or a heavily modded car.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2014 | 12:19 PM
  #1543  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by BurntOrangeT2

I don't know about anyone else but the GS F-Sport is ******* drop dead sexy in all aspects. Hell even the LS 460 F-Sport is sexy as hell too.


Lexus newer more aggressive styling is kick ***. Anyone see the new RC-F? This is something I would have no problems buying new. If anything, you know it's gonna be reliable.
http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...-and-info-news
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2014 | 12:35 PM
  #1544  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by t-von
Lexus newer more aggressive styling is kick ***. Anyone see the new RC-F? This is something I would have no problems buying new. If anything, you know it's gonna be reliable.
2015 Lexus RC F Photos and Info – News – Car and Driver
Don't like the big mouth or the bump in the hood relative to fenders and when are sedans going to get rid of that bimmer/bangle ***

I do like the middle section though
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2014 | 06:23 PM
  #1545  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn

Don't like the big mouth or the bump in the hood relative to fenders and when are sedans going to get rid of that bimmer/bangle ***

I do like the middle section though

The bump on the hood is to make room for the v8. I guess v8s are getting taller now an days as I'm starting to see humps on a lot of other models. I don't think the regular RC's have it. I have never bought a new car before. The next Rx7 was suppose to be that 1st new car purchase. I was gonna have specific instructions for the dealer to inform me when my 7 hit the lot. I was then gonna rush to the dealer and watch the mechanic perform the PDI (Pre Delivery Inspection). Then I was gonna simply drive my new 7 home with all the shipping and plastic wrap still on it so I could unwrap and wash it myself. This would have given me the sense of opening a big *** present. Lol! Plus it prevents the other salesmen from joy riding my car. Now unfortunatly since I don't see Mazda making any moves on a 7 anytime soon, I may end up with something like that RC-F if I start having too much trouble with the Audi.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2014 | 05:08 AM
  #1546  
Bwarrrrrp's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Originally Posted by t-von
The bump on the hood is to make room for the v8. I guess v8s are getting taller now an days as I'm starting to see humps on a lot of other models.
Perhaps v8's are moving to a more overhead style cams. I'm coming round to the thinking that it's just not necessary for v8's to have ohc. Also they are becoming strokier, but that's another story.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2014 | 11:48 AM
  #1547  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
well you should change the cooling system every 30k, its made from old newspapers and banana peels. there are a ton of threads where the OP replaced a whole system of parts (ignition, cooling) and still had the same problem, not a great way to diagnose things...
yep, i figured the guys who owned and worked on the cars should know the most probable places a problem would arise.

as in my previous post the problem was in the gauge, but of course i listened to everyone else who claimed everything else in the system was problematic. i guess it wasn't all bad, the car in fact runs cool even on a 110F+ day with the A/C on because i was so thorough with checking the flow through the engine. the gauge running up to the red though just tended to freak me out since the BMWs are as poor reliably as a rotary engine when overheated even once.

maybe it was the german in me working on a german car trying to reverse engineer everything when the answer was the simplest of all.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; Feb 9, 2014 at 11:53 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2014 | 12:22 PM
  #1548  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,771
Likes: 797
From: Bay Area CA
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
I would take those problems you had with your BMW over major driveline and power plant component failures any day.
Just the fact you think the BMW brand is junk and were so unhappy with your M5 ownership experience over those niggily things makes me wonder why you chose an RX-7 which is arguably worse.

While a fuel pump can easily leave you stranded most everything else that failed on your BMW wouldn't.

I've never had to tow any car I've ever owned more often then my FD. Its also the car I've put the least mileage on and spent the most money fixing (by exponentially higher amounts) then any car by far.
I've owned probably 20 cars of all differing makes and models.

The FD makes a Range Rover look reliable. BMW/Audi have thier issues but for what you get in ride quality, luxury, amenities, performance and fun factor in a practical form factor for daily driving then I say most of those issues you stated are livable.

Because seriously, who wants to drive a Lexus?

Disclaimer- LFA excluded.


Hopefully my memory is correct here. ZoomZoom can correct me if I'm wrong.

Just to put things in perspective....

What ZoomZoom went through with his FD was obscene. I've never heard of a car failing the same parts as often as they did on his car w/o any real understanding of why. At the time, it seemed like the car was cursed and needed to be gutted and re-incarnated in a different configuration. And iirc it was - as Carlisi's 3 rotor project.

I owned too many German cars over the years. They have always sucked from a maintenance perspective. Many stupid, over priced parts failing for no apparently good reason and every repair required a $pecial tool. The latest failure was on my Mini. Ever see the ******* thermostat on a Mini? I just can't understand why you couldn't just use a normal thermostat and gasket that seals for longer than 50k miles at a time...

I swear the Germans engineer their car parts to fail prematurely and require overcomplicated parts and special tools made only be German companies so that they can keep the bulk of their economy employed.


Both of my FDs have been far more reliable than any German car I have ever owned.

Last edited by gracer7-rx7; Feb 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2014 | 01:03 PM
  #1549  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
I swear the Germans engineer their car parts to fail prematurely and require overcomplicated parts and special tools made only be German companies so that they can keep the bulk of their economy employed.
i think the Germans do think about that when they build these things. it is as if they would like to protect the design and manufacturing industries in their country.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2014 | 08:05 PM
  #1550  
Flying_solo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Gurnee
I worked for Bosch for 6 years. I learned Germans try very hard to support other German industries. I cannot say I fault them for that. It has made them strong. They are also pretty darn concerned with the world around them and bettering it.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bosch_Stiftung
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.