3rd Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 3rd Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

My Problem With Electronic Boost Controllers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2022 | 01:04 PM
  #1  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,943
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
My Problem With Electronic Boost Controllers

Due to my engine mods, I have had problems with EBCs being slow at controlling boost. Resulting in high initial over boost.

It started when I rebuilt my modified engine in 1990 running Pettit modified stock twins in non-seq mode and the Apexi PFC.
I installed the Blitz SBC and experienced high initial over boost. Gain better control by moving the boost source after the IC instead of the turbos outlet. But still had the problem.
After reading up on the system, I converted it to the DSBC which mostly solved the problem. It ran 2 solenoids in parallel installed inside one plastic box.

Used this same EBC when converting to a single turbo back in 2005. But in the winter of 2020 the Blitz died. Replaced it with the TurboSmart E-Boost Street.
I picked it due to it having more functional ability than the Blitz which was no longer available.

But it had the same problem as the Blitz. I tried hooking it up using both the top and side WG ports, only the side port, and different boost sources.
Remembering the DSBC, I purchased a spare Turbosmart solenoid and made my own dual setup. I am currently tuning it now with much improved results.
The small single solenoids just do not flow enough for very fast rising boost peaking around 4000 rpm.

See attached picture.

Last edited by cewrx7r1; Feb 3, 2022 at 01:07 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2022 | 10:58 PM
  #2  
TeamRX8's Avatar
10000 RPM Lane
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,741
Likes: 924
From: on the rev limiter
kind of surprised that you didn’t put 90°s on those other two connections and just Y them together like the other one, except they would be offset slightly from that one due to their offset position.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2022 | 10:27 AM
  #3  
wthx100's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 365
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
da fuq time to get an electronic wg.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2022 | 04:36 PM
  #4  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,943
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
kind of surprised that you didn’t put 90°s on those other two connections and just Y them together like the other one, except they would be offset slightly from that one due to their offset position.
Do to space problems where it is mounted to the firewall behind the UIM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2022 | 04:58 PM
  #5  
Manny_Apex's Avatar
@Pettit Racing
Veteran: Air Force
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 486
Likes: 190
From: Palm Bay, FL
Originally Posted by cewrx7r1
Do to space problems where it is mounted to the firewall behind the UIM.
The technology has come a long way since 2005. Have you considered upgrading your setup to run an electronic boost controller? My Haltech runs all of my boost settings via a boost control solenoid valve.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2022 | 05:33 PM
  #6  
gdub29e's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 804
Likes: 286
From: Millersville Md
Originally Posted by Manny_Apex
The technology has come a long way since 2005. Have you considered upgrading your setup to run an electronic boost controller? My Haltech runs all of my boost settings via a boost control solenoid valve.

Fun fact, Chuck was one of the first adopters of the power FC. He pioneered a lot of the information we still use today. His tuning notes have been used by hundreds if not thousands of people on the subject.
Anywho he is using a EBC but was experiencing what I’m assuming is a orifice size / cubic volume issue for his particular set up, which he solved by putting another solenoid valve in parallel. The power fc boost control is far from being as refined as a haltech but it does seem to work. I use it on both my single snail and sequential’s car with great success. This thread has a lot of info on the subject … https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo...ispreloading=1 Most people do seem to put an external one on for more flexibility when not using a modern ecu

Chuck, could you post the combinations settings you’re using currently with that setup? Would be helpful for future reference on setups that are experiencing the same issues. Hope all's well!

~ GW

Last edited by gdub29e; Feb 4, 2022 at 05:50 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2022 | 11:47 PM
  #7  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,943
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Originally Posted by gdub29e
Fun fact, Chuck was one of the first adopters of the power FC. He pioneered a lot of the information we still use today. His tuning notes have been used by hundreds if not thousands of people on the subject.
Anywho he is using a EBC but was experiencing what I’m assuming is a orifice size / cubic volume issue for his particular set up, which he solved by putting another solenoid valve in parallel. The power fc boost control is far from being as refined as a haltech but it does seem to work. I use it on both my single snail and sequential’s car with great success. This thread has a lot of info on the subject … https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo...ispreloading=1 Most people do seem to put an external one on for more flexibility when not using a modern ecu

Chuck, could you post the combinations settings you’re using currently with that setup? Would be helpful for future reference on setups that are experiencing the same issues. Hope all's well!

~ GW
This cold weather is messing with my tuning. My ecu is the PFC, but the EBC is a Turbo Smart E-Boost Street.
lI runs two boost settings, mine are : 12+ psi for normal use and 18+ for warp speed. The 12 psi is very close, just need to fine tune the sensitivity value. Only made one run with 18 psi.
Have to wait for warmer weather which will take a while to get back in the low 60s. But Houston can change in just one day.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2022 | 04:05 AM
  #8  
Ceylon's Avatar
Non Runner
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 282
From: Somerset, England
The 35 series Mac valves are great for this purpose. Great flow and reaction times. I've been building a new solenoid solution for my car using 35's for Pre and WG control and stackable 37's on a custom manifold for the rest.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jpar196
Power FC Forum
2
Sep 30, 2010 06:22 AM
ichiro-jp.kr
Power FC Forum
6
Jan 18, 2009 11:10 AM
fd3s_
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
Feb 26, 2007 07:52 PM
Poweraxel
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
Oct 31, 2002 12:11 PM
Rx-Revin
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
Sep 28, 2002 12:52 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.